collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by tomd2103
[Today at 12:48:38 PM]


FFP by Dave
[Today at 12:21:11 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by brontebilly
[Today at 12:09:07 PM]


Emi Martinez by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 12:05:43 PM]


Unai Emery by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:03:00 PM]


Everton (A) by Ads
[Today at 11:17:43 AM]


GUESS THE GOAL R1: Brentford v ASTON VILLA, Saturday 23rd August! 🥅 by nordenvillain
[Today at 09:21:55 AM]


Tyrone Mings by aj2k77
[Today at 09:20:22 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths  (Read 309482 times)

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30268
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2400 on: April 30, 2018, 09:22:36 PM »
Sorry, but I can't grasp the mechanics of it. Are people suggesting that we've only won the games that we'd decided beforehand we were going to win, or one that we now had to win because we fucked up by not winning a previous one that we'd meant to, and that when we'd lost through being shit, we'd been shit on purpose because those points didn't matter?

I feel like I'm arguing with my nan about the wrestling on World Of Sport.

I think the suggestion is that Bruce decided at the start of the season that 87 points would be enough for us to go up, so as long as we were on course for that then we'd be Ok in the end. I have an issue with this (if it's true) because three teams have reached beyond that total. We're still on course to hit it and we'll finish fourth.

If it's true, would you have had an issue with it had he set a target of 87 points and we finished second?

Think about what you've just written.

No, you answer the question.


Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22930
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2401 on: April 30, 2018, 09:22:49 PM »
Where did this suggestion come from?

One of his post-match interviews. He didn't say what the target was, but he said that he'd set a target and if we reach that, and other teams do even better, you shake them by the hand and say 'well done'.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30268
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2402 on: April 30, 2018, 09:23:40 PM »
Where did this suggestion come from?

One of his post-match interviews. He didn't say what the target was, but he said that he'd set a target and if we reach that, and other teams do even better, you shake them by the hand and say 'well done'.

So you don't know what target he set but you're ridiculing it anyway?


Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75978
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2403 on: April 30, 2018, 09:24:41 PM »
So you don't know what the target is, if we've reached it or if anyone else has besides Wolves (as you'd have to assume they passed it)?

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22930
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2404 on: April 30, 2018, 09:24:48 PM »
Sorry, but I can't grasp the mechanics of it. Are people suggesting that we've only won the games that we'd decided beforehand we were going to win, or one that we now had to win because we fucked up by not winning a previous one that we'd meant to, and that when we'd lost through being shit, we'd been shit on purpose because those points didn't matter?

I feel like I'm arguing with my nan about the wrestling on World Of Sport.

I think the suggestion is that Bruce decided at the start of the season that 87 points would be enough for us to go up, so as long as we were on course for that then we'd be Ok in the end. I have an issue with this (if it's true) because three teams have reached beyond that total. We're still on course to hit it and we'll finish fourth.

If it's true, would you have had an issue with it had he set a target of 87 points and we finished second?

Think about what you've just written.

No, you answer the question.



I would've been happy if we were on course to hit it, and there was no sign of THREE other teams who were doing better than us, who looked likely to do better than it.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22930
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2405 on: April 30, 2018, 09:26:17 PM »
So you don't know what the target is, if we've reached it or if anyone else has besides Wolves (as you'd have to assume they passed it)?

Somebody on here mentioned 87 points. I was hoping they could repeat it to give some context because (if it is true) I find it to be totally mental.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63355
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2406 on: April 30, 2018, 09:26:44 PM »
Where did this suggestion come from?

One of his post-match interviews. He didn't say what the target was, but he said that he'd set a target and if we reach that, and other teams do even better, you shake them by the hand and say 'well done'.

Based on that it hardly seems a hard and fast rule that he's lived the entire season by. In fact it doesn't seem anything except yet another tedious stick to beat Steve Bruce with. 

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75978
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2407 on: April 30, 2018, 09:27:43 PM »
So they've guessed and none of us know if we or anyone has reached it but you're giving him stick for it? I'm not exactly known as a Bruce fan and even i think that's harsh on him.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30268
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2408 on: April 30, 2018, 09:28:40 PM »
I'm laughing at this. It's so utterly ridiculous.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22930
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2409 on: April 30, 2018, 09:29:16 PM »
Where did this suggestion come from?

One of his post-match interviews. He didn't say what the target was, but he said that he'd set a target and if we reach that, and other teams do even better, you shake them by the hand and say 'well done'.

So you don't know what target he set but you're ridiculing it anyway?



Oh my fucking God, Clamply. I'm asking a question, that's all. I'm also moaning because it strikes me that, despite sounding totally mental, it's something that could be true. I'm just asking though.

I'm sure that if Steve Bruce ever needs an online minder somebody at Cambridge Analytica has got your details.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30268
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2410 on: April 30, 2018, 09:29:54 PM »
Where did this suggestion come from?

One of his post-match interviews. He didn't say what the target was, but he said that he'd set a target and if we reach that, and other teams do even better, you shake them by the hand and say 'well done'.

So you don't know what target he set but you're ridiculing it anyway?



Oh my fucking God, Clamply. I'm asking a question, that's all. I'm also moaning because it strikes me that, despite sounding totally mental, it's something that could be true. I'm just asking though.

I'm sure that if Steve Bruce ever needs an online minder somebody at Cambridge Analytica has got your details.

I'm not the only one calling you out on this by the way.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75978
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2411 on: April 30, 2018, 09:30:55 PM »
I reckon even John would think it's harsh on Bruce, that's how harsh it is.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22930
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2412 on: April 30, 2018, 09:33:42 PM »
I reckon even John would think it's harsh on Bruce, that's how harsh it is.

It's harsh if I've made it up (and I might have, but I don't think so). I was really just asking (and adding some personal spin in advance of the fact so my sincere apologies to SB for that). I'm sure I've seen this discussed beyond my own bitter prejudice, but I'll leave it there for now.

Online Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14164
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2413 on: April 30, 2018, 09:34:28 PM »
If we’re still in the Championship at 8 pm on 26th May let’s worry about it then.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75978
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Much Awaited Return of Promotion Maths
« Reply #2414 on: April 30, 2018, 09:39:06 PM »
He's mentioned targets but as far as I can tell the 87 points is just a random number picked. Personally, I'd have thought if anyone was to say the points they wanted to aim for automatic promotion would be more likely to be 90-92. If you hit 90 and don't finish top 2 then you would have to doff your cap to 2 other clubs.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal