It's either twat talk like 'blue sky thinking' etc, or it does mean a back sponsor. Otherwise they'd just say 'shirt sponsor' like they have done for decades.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on June 26, 2017, 08:21:01 PMIt's either twat talk like 'blue sky thinking' etc, or it does mean a back sponsor. Otherwise they'd just say 'shirt sponsor' like they have done for decades. Sounds like corporate bs to me. Couldn't just say reveal our sponsor but then I guess we've got quite a few sponsors - you only have to look at the bottom of the site. If that's the case it would have been better wording it as 'shirt sponsor'.
I reckon you need to give the chap a break. From where he has come from and what he has achieved, I reckon he knows what he is doing when it comes to the commercial side of sport. Lotus F1 and Wasps are no were not easy jobs and by all accounts have been very successful.
I don't bet, but I'd wager that the iFollow substitute we're cooking up won't be ready on time, judging from his comments.
Whatever happens the home kit will not be the right claret/blue, the socks should have thinner/wider hoops, the shorts are too baggy/tight, the sponsor does not reflect our heritage and is not Acorns, the away kit is not white/black/yellow/blue/green and why is John Terry wearing a Chelsea kit under his new Villa shirt?