Quote from: brian green on July 25, 2017, 09:30:39 AMI think, respectfully, Paul that you are strengthening my point. Lerner's naivete allowed the appointment of inferior quality employees. What he allowed to happen in his custodianship of the Cleveland Browns is not coincidence.It is a tough one for me. Because of my stuff with the Trust I have got to know some former senior figures in a personal capacity.You couldn't meet a nicer bloke than Paul Faulkner but he was woefully out of his depth running a football club. He got the gig as Lerner likes him and he was instrumental in bringing Sir Flouncealot to account (and that was because Lerner didn't have the bollocks to just sack him).As a businessman, Fox was a much shrewder operator. He quickly tried to right the ship from a commercial perspective (we were actually losing money on merchandise given the half headed nature of some of the deals Faulkner agreed). He knew they needed a proper management structure. He just didn't have the football knowledge to get the right people in place.Hollis was the brightest of the lot and would have been a sound Chairman had he stopped around longer. I get the impression he never really fancied it long term though.
I think, respectfully, Paul that you are strengthening my point. Lerner's naivete allowed the appointment of inferior quality employees. What he allowed to happen in his custodianship of the Cleveland Browns is not coincidence.
In the last 3 years Manchester City have spent something like £340m. On goalkeepers and defenders.
In addition to the comments above, is it worth repeating that the biggest mistake Lerner made was letting Steve Stride go and the second-biggest was not dragging him back off whatever golf course he happened to be playing the minute O'Neil walked out?
is there any good target man out there we could try to sign. We want someone like Benteke/Les Ferdinard/Alan Shearer/Gerry Hitchens/Pongo Waring . Don't want Peter Crouch. I know C Ronaldo could be ideal but that is about likely as Walsall winning the Champions League.
If we play 3 at the back we need more cover (unless he thinks Bree or de Laet can do it)
Quote from: Matt Collins on July 25, 2017, 05:00:44 PMIf we play 3 at the back we need more cover (unless he thinks Bree or de Laet can do it)We've not played 3 at the back all summer so we're not likely to now (IMHO)As for Snodgrass, isn't he a RIGHT winger ?
Twitter is linking us to Robert Snodgrass today. Would be a top player in the Championship, but the fee being talked about is £7m plus, which is an awful lot for a player who'll be 30 in September. Bruce has previously admitted to wanting him though, so there's every chance it's a genuine link. Veretout's fee + McCormack's wages (and possible fee) would probably about cover the outlay too.As an aside, I still think we need another centre-back. We've no idea about the durability of Samba, or how many games we'll get out of Terry. Sadly, we know all too well about Baker's durability (or lack of). Granted the 3 of them (and Jedinak) should all be able to cover each others' absences, but my big fear is what happens if/when Chester gets injured. A back 2 containing any combination of that 4 would be so slow it'd force our defence to set-up so deep it would hinder the whole team. None of the younger CBs that we have look to have the physicality to play in the Championship yet (Suliman in particular looks to be very lightweight). Did somebody previously say that De Laet can play as a CB in emergencies...?