Quote from: TaxDodger on February 22, 2017, 09:09:39 AMDon't see what the issue is if he comes in as cover on a pay as you play until the end of the season. He's not going to be starting ahead of Baker and Chester and he's unlikely to be any worse than Elphick or Richards.My exact words. Thanks for saving me the trouble of typing them.
Don't see what the issue is if he comes in as cover on a pay as you play until the end of the season. He's not going to be starting ahead of Baker and Chester and he's unlikely to be any worse than Elphick or Richards.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 22, 2017, 10:13:24 AMQuote from: TaxDodger on February 22, 2017, 09:09:39 AMDon't see what the issue is if he comes in as cover on a pay as you play until the end of the season. He's not going to be starting ahead of Baker and Chester and he's unlikely to be any worse than Elphick or Richards.My exact words. Thanks for saving me the trouble of typing them.One issue is the lack of planning. Making no judgement on the player we've been linked with, we've had no new injuries at centre-back since January. If he thought a new centre-back was needed he had ample opportunity and backing to get one last month.So either he's realised in the last three weeks and not before that :A) one or more of our current centre-backs isn't good enough and needs replacing orB) he wants to completely change the system we play and therefore requires more centre-backs than we have.Neither one reflects particularly well on him.
Quote from: Dave on February 22, 2017, 10:26:23 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 22, 2017, 10:13:24 AMQuote from: TaxDodger on February 22, 2017, 09:09:39 AMDon't see what the issue is if he comes in as cover on a pay as you play until the end of the season. He's not going to be starting ahead of Baker and Chester and he's unlikely to be any worse than Elphick or Richards.My exact words. Thanks for saving me the trouble of typing them.One issue is the lack of planning. Making no judgement on the player we've been linked with, we've had no new injuries at centre-back since January. If he thought a new centre-back was needed he had ample opportunity and backing to get one last month.So either he's realised in the last three weeks and not before that :A) one or more of our current centre-backs isn't good enough and needs replacing orB) he wants to completely change the system we play and therefore requires more centre-backs than we have.Neither one reflects particularly well on him.Alternatively the ones he wanted weren't available in January?Perhaps he wanted the likes Lees or Loovens from Wednesday or Moore from Reading or even Curtis Davies if Hull go down but their clubs didn't want to sell?
At 32 he still has another 4 or 5 years of this level in him. I know nothing of his fitness or injury situation but I do know he was a very good defender and if he's training he must be in half decent shape. The prospect of him alongside Chester is more appealing than Chester alongside what we currently have. I welcome his addition to the squad.
Has he actually signed and can he play this season?
The penny that I hope has dropped is that Steve Bruce has acknowledged that his own opinion is not enough to bring the Norwegian Blue parrot back to life. A dead parrot is a dead parrot. A useless centre back is a useless centre back.
Chris Samba...hmmm...can he play in goal?