Bottom line is houllier was way past his best and it showed
Quote from: KevinGage on February 22, 2017, 02:15:16 PMMight have had something to do with winning the League Cup. We were third that season into February. Having secured the cup (our first in 20 years) and European football in March , BFR decided to field sides made up of the likes of Beitkreutz, Beinlich and Yorke with one eye on next season. Finishing 4th or finishing 10th didn't matter a whole pile either way back then. This was pre 1999, when you couldn't get a CL place by failing to win the league. 6th was the highest we were in Feb.
Might have had something to do with winning the League Cup. We were third that season into February. Having secured the cup (our first in 20 years) and European football in March , BFR decided to field sides made up of the likes of Beitkreutz, Beinlich and Yorke with one eye on next season. Finishing 4th or finishing 10th didn't matter a whole pile either way back then. This was pre 1999, when you couldn't get a CL place by failing to win the league.
There's a lot of revisionism going on with Houllier just because the season he was manager for some of the time (lest we forget the results before he arrived and after he was ill were better than when he was in charge) wasn't as godawful as what's followed. He was old, semi-retired, out of touch and as it turned out not physically capable of being the manager of an ambitious club competing for European football. It was a bad appointment. Just because what followed was worse doesn't make it better.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on February 22, 2017, 07:44:53 PMQuote from: KevinGage on February 22, 2017, 02:15:16 PMMight have had something to do with winning the League Cup. We were third that season into February. Having secured the cup (our first in 20 years) and European football in March , BFR decided to field sides made up of the likes of Beitkreutz, Beinlich and Yorke with one eye on next season. Finishing 4th or finishing 10th didn't matter a whole pile either way back then. This was pre 1999, when you couldn't get a CL place by failing to win the league. 6th was the highest we were in Feb.We beat Blackburn away to go 3rd under O'Neill. Durh, ignore me.
Quote from: Ads on February 22, 2017, 09:26:51 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on February 22, 2017, 07:44:53 PMQuote from: KevinGage on February 22, 2017, 02:15:16 PMMight have had something to do with winning the League Cup. We were third that season into February. Having secured the cup (our first in 20 years) and European football in March , BFR decided to field sides made up of the likes of Beitkreutz, Beinlich and Yorke with one eye on next season. Finishing 4th or finishing 10th didn't matter a whole pile either way back then. This was pre 1999, when you couldn't get a CL place by failing to win the league. 6th was the highest we were in Feb.We beat Blackburn away to go 3rd under O'Neill. Durh, ignore me.I think we were 3rd at the time of Moscow and Stoke fiasco and that was February?
Quote from: olaftab on February 22, 2017, 10:56:20 PMQuote from: Ads on February 22, 2017, 09:26:51 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on February 22, 2017, 07:44:53 PMQuote from: KevinGage on February 22, 2017, 02:15:16 PMMight have had something to do with winning the League Cup. We were third that season into February. Having secured the cup (our first in 20 years) and European football in March , BFR decided to field sides made up of the likes of Beitkreutz, Beinlich and Yorke with one eye on next season. Finishing 4th or finishing 10th didn't matter a whole pile either way back then. This was pre 1999, when you couldn't get a CL place by failing to win the league. 6th was the highest we were in Feb.We beat Blackburn away to go 3rd under O'Neill. Durh, ignore me.I think we were 3rd at the time of Moscow and Stoke fiasco and that was February?We're talking about 1993/94.
Not sure the results we better before he came in, we won 2 out of 7. Got slapped for 6 at Newcastle and dumped out the UEFA cup.