Quote from: Clampy on September 17, 2016, 07:16:17 PMQuote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 07:14:03 PMQuote from: Clampy on September 17, 2016, 06:48:06 PMQuote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 06:42:47 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 17, 2016, 06:38:43 PMI'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed. As long as the job came with the usual two or three year contract, of course there would be.So we keep paying them out every time it dosen't go right after 8 games?You're ignoring the cost of persisting with failing managers, which is far in excess of the cost of paying off a contract in most circumstances.I didn't realise 8 games in was a faliure.It is, unless you think where we are is acceptable.
Quote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 07:14:03 PMQuote from: Clampy on September 17, 2016, 06:48:06 PMQuote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 06:42:47 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 17, 2016, 06:38:43 PMI'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed. As long as the job came with the usual two or three year contract, of course there would be.So we keep paying them out every time it dosen't go right after 8 games?You're ignoring the cost of persisting with failing managers, which is far in excess of the cost of paying off a contract in most circumstances.I didn't realise 8 games in was a faliure.
Quote from: Clampy on September 17, 2016, 06:48:06 PMQuote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 06:42:47 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 17, 2016, 06:38:43 PMI'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed. As long as the job came with the usual two or three year contract, of course there would be.So we keep paying them out every time it dosen't go right after 8 games?You're ignoring the cost of persisting with failing managers, which is far in excess of the cost of paying off a contract in most circumstances.
Quote from: Risso on September 17, 2016, 06:42:47 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 17, 2016, 06:38:43 PMI'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed. As long as the job came with the usual two or three year contract, of course there would be.So we keep paying them out every time it dosen't go right after 8 games?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 17, 2016, 06:38:43 PMI'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed. As long as the job came with the usual two or three year contract, of course there would be.
I'm sure there'd be a line of suitable managers a mile long who'd want to work for an owner that let their predecessor spend £50 million then sacked him three weeks after the window closed.
I know eight games is nothing, and one voice in my head tells me sacking him now would be unfair. But then another reminds me we are eighteenth in the championship and look pathologically unable to win gamesRegardless of whether he gets the sack or not, what we have seen so far is nowhere near good enough.Oh and that "fickle" argument is bullshit. Look at the league table. We play awful sides week after week and have only beaten one. Even Newcastle have won a few I appreciate the arguments against sacking him but to suggest we should not be extremely concerned now is fucking nuts.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 17, 2016, 07:50:01 PMI know eight games is nothing, and one voice in my head tells me sacking him now would be unfair. But then another reminds me we are eighteenth in the championship and look pathologically unable to win gamesRegardless of whether he gets the sack or not, what we have seen so far is nowhere near good enough.Oh and that "fickle" argument is bullshit. Look at the league table. We play awful sides week after week and have only beaten one. Even Newcastle have won a few I appreciate the arguments against sacking him but to suggest we should not be extremely concerned now is fucking nuts.I think you and the likes of you are talking bullshit but il keep my thoughts to myself and try not to patronise anyone.
4 wins from our last 48 league games. Is it any wonder some folks are getting worried and don't have a shitload of patience? We're in Division 2 and still don't look capable of winning games on a regular basis. Despite playing at a lower level and having a load of new players all the weaknesses from the last few years still seem to be there, the only difference is the opposition are a lot shitter than in previous seasons.