Quote from: mr underhill on September 01, 2017, 09:09:11 AMso he was at it then, in a sense, as he was the club's only shareholder?He didn't take any of it out, if that's what you mean.
so he was at it then, in a sense, as he was the club's only shareholder?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 01, 2017, 09:10:02 AMQuote from: mr underhill on September 01, 2017, 09:09:11 AMso he was at it then, in a sense, as he was the club's only shareholder?He didn't take any of it out, if that's what you mean. I will criticise Lerner for many, many things, and we will probably regret his ownership of the club for years to come, but one thing that you absolutely cannot accuse him of is using the club for personal enrichment. Rarely has one man spent so much money, so very badly. From memory, he took £7m out in the first year, but that came back in about 30 times over. It's is fair to say that the Lerner family trust took one hell of a battering from Randy's time with us, as did the club of course. A spectacular disaster all round.
Probably wishful thinking on my part but Tony's latest tweet looks to me like a warning to Bruce.Shape up or............?
There are two very big it's there Clampy. If we start playing well. If we go on a winning run. All of the available evidence from the forty games Bruce has been in charge suggest that is what is likely to happen. IF we go on a winning run he can stay for life as far as I am concerned.