collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Golf 2025 by Villa Lew
[August 24, 2025, 11:03:24 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Matt C
[August 24, 2025, 10:52:13 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by danno
[August 24, 2025, 10:45:24 PM]


Boubacar Kamara by stevo_st
[August 24, 2025, 10:38:18 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R2: ASTON VILLA v Palace, Sunday 31st August! by Louzie0
[August 24, 2025, 10:30:39 PM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Ads
[August 24, 2025, 10:25:13 PM]


Amadou Onana by Beard82
[August 24, 2025, 09:45:06 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by darren woolley
[August 24, 2025, 09:14:30 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Nathan Baker?  (Read 21270 times)

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55284
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #60 on: June 12, 2016, 06:11:17 PM »
Baker is not good enough as a first choice in the Premiership ......

But we are not in that next season and he is fine at Championship level

We won't see anywhere near 50 million spent and what is spent there are many other areas to spend it on ....... it will be interesting if its a 50 million spend and if that includes those going out who might make up 30 million at a guess

Does that paragraph not seem slightly odd to you?

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18198
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #61 on: June 12, 2016, 06:56:40 PM »
Baker is not good enough as a first choice in the Premiership ......

But we are not in that next season and he is fine at Championship level

We won't see anywhere near 50 million spent and what is spent there are many other areas to spend it on ....... it will be interesting if its a 50 million spend and if that includes those going out who might make up 30 million at a guess

Does that paragraph not seem slightly odd to you?
"must try harder"

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10794
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #62 on: June 12, 2016, 07:05:03 PM »
Baker is not good enough as a first choice in the Premiership ......

But we are not in that next season and he is fine at Championship level

We won't see anywhere near 50 million spent and what is spent there are many other areas to spend it on ....... it will be interesting if its a 50 million spend and if that includes those going out who might make up 30 million at a guess

last I read, it was more like £30m plus any revenue generated from sales.  All speculation mind.

Offline Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15704
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #63 on: June 12, 2016, 07:11:54 PM »
Baker is not good enough as a first choice in the Premiership ......

But we are not in that next season and he is fine at Championship level

We won't see anywhere near 50 million spent and what is spent there are many other areas to spend it on ....... it will be interesting if its a 50 million spend and if that includes those going out who might make up 30 million at a guess

Does that paragraph not seem slightly odd to you?
I have read that twice and I'm still none the wiser.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74656
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #64 on: June 12, 2016, 07:55:03 PM »
Why do people keep going on about players who are "fine at championship level" like that is what we need?

Yes, fine if we're planning to hang around that level like Leeds, not so good if we want to get out of it quickly.

We need players who are too good for that level, not of that level.

We do not have some divine right to bounce back. We will need good players, not dross like Baker.

Offline rougegorge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1601
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #65 on: June 12, 2016, 08:26:06 PM »
Why do people keep going on about players who are "fine at championship level" like that is what we need?

Yes, fine if we're planning to hang around that level like Leeds, not so good if we want to get out of it quickly.

We need players who are too good for that level, not of that level.

We do not have some divine right to bounce back. We will need good players, not dross like Baker.

Exactly!  If we think that players are OK for the championship and accept them,  we will set the bar at a low level just like we did in the premier league under Lambert. We'll just accept mediocrity.

In the main, the players that took us down won't be good enough to get us back up and those we loaned out won't be either.




Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #66 on: June 12, 2016, 11:47:22 PM »
Why do people keep going on about players who are "fine at championship level" like that is what we need?

Yes, fine if we're planning to hang around that level like Leeds, not so good if we want to get out of it quickly.

We need players who are too good for that level, not of that level.

We do not have some divine right to bounce back. We will need good players, not dross like Baker.

Yes, but we are unlikely to be able to get a whole team of "too good" in one or even two transfer windows, so we are going to have to get as many as we can afford and who will come here and then complement them with "good enough".


Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #67 on: June 13, 2016, 12:04:28 AM »
Lescott, Richards and Okore are probably all going to go. Baker is worth keeping for me. As is Clark(e). Nathan isn't the best but what he is, is a player who'll put himself on the line. Sometimes to his detriment, but you can never fault his commitment. He's fine at that level and will be a fine stand-in, as/when needed. Buy two new decent senior CH's.
Hopefully our sensible new management team will persuade Okore to stay.

Hopefully they will fuck him right off.

Offline old man villa fan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3458
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #68 on: June 13, 2016, 08:03:41 AM »
The thing you have to look at is whether a player is going to improve given more experience and confidence of playing in a winning team.  I do not think Baker will as his major weakness is reading the game and being caught out of position.  At his age and number of games he has played, I do not think that this can be coached into him.

Baker would only be good enough as back up but then you put a block on developing young players coming behind him.

Offline Villa in Denmark

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12815
  • Age: 1025
  • Location: Lost
  • On a road to nowhere
  • GM : 25.09.2025
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #69 on: June 13, 2016, 09:11:27 AM »
Lescott, Richards and Okore are probably all going to go. Baker is worth keeping for me. As is Clark(e). Nathan isn't the best but what he is, is a player who'll put himself on the line. Sometimes to his detriment, but you can never fault his commitment. He's fine at that level and will be a fine stand-in, as/when needed. Buy two new decent senior CH's.
Hopefully our sensible new management team will persuade Okore to stay.

Hopefully they will fuck him right off.

Yet on another thread you'd give the king of the ******, Agbonlahor another chance?

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #70 on: June 13, 2016, 09:12:27 AM »
Yet on another thread you haven't once again read my post properly.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #71 on: June 13, 2016, 09:13:41 AM »
Don't bite, VID.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #72 on: June 13, 2016, 09:17:27 AM »
Bite? Somebody clearly hasn't read what i posted and it is that person who shouldn't bite? Right, okay.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #73 on: June 13, 2016, 09:23:39 AM »
From memory your post began something along the lines "I am a great fan of Agbonlahor". 

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Nathan Baker?
« Reply #74 on: June 13, 2016, 09:30:50 AM »
Let me help you with your memory then brian as the full post went like this:

I'm a big Gabby fan and think that with him properly coached and managed he could be a big player for us next season. However, I agree that his disgraceful behaviour last season may be something he can't and maybe shouldn't be allowed to come back from.

and then to respond to KevinGage remarking on his attitude last season:

His contract is the problem. Unless we can get someone to agree to take him on, and it's likely to be overseas, then the likelihood is that he'll be with us until his contract ends. He potentially has 2 years left (if that's how long he has on his contract) as a professional footballer. If that doesn't concentrate the mind then he's as good as done anywhere.



Now, you show me where I am willing to give Gabby another chance other than we may have no choice but to keep him? It is ViD trying to get bites out of me because I hope that Okore is dumped by the club. Something which he, probably given his current location, finds hard to accept.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal