Quote from: auntiesledd on May 20, 2016, 09:17:56 AMFrankly, I think this rebranding of VP is bloody awful - but then I'm not one for all this modern day BS in football. Still, he who pays the piper... Get with the programme, old man.
Frankly, I think this rebranding of VP is bloody awful - but then I'm not one for all this modern day BS in football. Still, he who pays the piper...
Quote from: peter w on May 20, 2016, 09:42:28 AMQuote from: auntiesledd on May 20, 2016, 09:17:56 AMFrankly, I think this rebranding of VP is bloody awful - but then I'm not one for all this modern day BS in football. Still, he who pays the piper... Get with the programme, old man.Haha. It's how it is. I can see the world media calling it the lotus in seasons new.
This subject has cropped up a number of times over the years and my opinion remains the same as it did when this notion was first muted. For commercial purposes I see the logic, especially if we can get back into the Premiership asap. From a practical perspective I don’t believe a single Villa fan will name it anything else other than Villa Park, so I say he can knock himself out with the name of the stadium. Of course, if he fancies a quick win renaming a part of the ground, he’s welcome to start on the Doug Ellis stand tomorrow.
If he can re generate the area around VP and make us a more attractive proposition then go for it. Most importantly, if he can open a pub that doesn't fleece the fans for entry he can call it whatever he likes.
Quote from: Herman on May 20, 2016, 07:38:08 AMVilla Park ChoiExcellent.
Villa Park Choi
Splash your logos and adverts wherever you like but we play at Villa Park it's non negotiable. Where does this end? next we'll be discussing the new blue and white home kit - Rule number 1 Doc, don't mess with our tradition.
Given he's already bought the club, does it actually generate any revenue for us though ?
It's just a name for a building. Now changing the club name would be something quite different obviously