Naming rights in the Championship would be the square root of fuck all.
I love Villa park, but really it's just 4 identikit stands, the oldest of which was built in 1977 and is a bit of a monstrosity. It does still have the feel of a traditional stadium, but times move on, just as they did when the historic stands of old were replaced with what we have today.I wouldn't sacrifice the name for trifling amounts of money, but if it was necessary for a major investment - the sort that took us back to European glory, then yeah, you would be mad not to.
Quote from: chrisw1 on May 13, 2016, 12:35:27 PMI love Villa park, but really it's just 4 identikit stands, the oldest of which was built in 1977 and is a bit of a monstrosity. It does still have the feel of a traditional stadium, but times move on, just as they did when the historic stands of old were replaced with what we have today.I wouldn't sacrifice the name for trifling amounts of money, but if it was necessary for a major investment - the sort that took us back to European glory, then yeah, you would be mad not to.Name me another stand like The Holte End.I used to have a picture of the Holte as my wallpaper at work. Everyone who saw it said a variation on "what the fuck is that".
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on May 13, 2016, 09:58:03 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on May 13, 2016, 12:35:27 PMI love Villa park, but really it's just 4 identikit stands, the oldest of which was built in 1977 and is a bit of a monstrosity. It does still have the feel of a traditional stadium, but times move on, just as they did when the historic stands of old were replaced with what we have today.I wouldn't sacrifice the name for trifling amounts of money, but if it was necessary for a major investment - the sort that took us back to European glory, then yeah, you would be mad not to.Name me another stand like The Holte End.I used to have a picture of the Holte as my wallpaper at work. Everyone who saw it said a variation on "what the fuck is that".Seated or standing?
Well they tried to change the name in its first year of existence 1897 from Aston Lower Grounds to Villa Park but the public didn't like it.It took ten years to get it officially accepted!
Quote from: Phil from the upper holte on May 13, 2016, 03:48:32 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on May 13, 2016, 09:24:49 AMI want a winning team. If part of that is having to adopt a new name for the stadium then so be it. Everyone will still know the real name of the ground.Is now my feelings on the matter, It's not ideal but if it brings in money for new players then so be it. You have to move with the times Do you really? Is it law now?
Quote from: chrisw1 on May 13, 2016, 09:24:49 AMI want a winning team. If part of that is having to adopt a new name for the stadium then so be it. Everyone will still know the real name of the ground.Is now my feelings on the matter, It's not ideal but if it brings in money for new players then so be it. You have to move with the times
I want a winning team. If part of that is having to adopt a new name for the stadium then so be it. Everyone will still know the real name of the ground.
StuThe same generation of fans will keep banging on about the 76-83 teams because they were quite simply the finest That they have ever seen at vp.magical times magical players that I hope one day that I see again and I know that I will never stop going on about those teams for as long as I live.Can you ever imagine man yoo fans getting fed up of hearing about best law charlton etcI can see what you are saying that where's the awesome villa team for our generation to talk about for years to come.But 40 years later I am still waiting to see a better right back than gidman or a left back like Charlie aitken or midfielder better than Cropley or a front two that can match gray and little in there prime so sorry mate until those come along we will still have to bang on about them