collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Squad 25/26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 06:26:10 AM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Toronto Villa
[Today at 03:52:03 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 03:50:03 AM]


FFP by Rory
[Today at 01:04:34 AM]


Going West - Brentford away by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 12:57:13 AM]


Alex Moreno - Gone by eamonn
[Today at 12:20:33 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by eamonn
[Today at 12:01:40 AM]


Unai Emery by eamonn
[August 21, 2025, 11:50:58 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Squad 25/26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 06:26:10 AM]


Re: Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Toronto Villa
[Today at 03:52:03 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 03:50:03 AM]


Re: FFP by Rory
[Today at 01:04:34 AM]


Re: Going West - Brentford away by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 12:57:13 AM]


Re: Squad 25/26 by stevo_st
[Today at 12:55:38 AM]


Going West - Brentford away by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:37:56 AM]


Re: Alex Moreno - Gone by eamonn
[Today at 12:20:33 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who'd take Pulis now?  (Read 26433 times)

Offline LukeJames

  • Member
  • Posts: 5375
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #75 on: March 02, 2016, 10:23:51 PM »
Absolutely right. None of the last four managers in fact have had, except for Lambert occasionally, any sort of plan to deal with the opposition. Pulis makes sure every single player knows exactly what his role is and sticks to it. I wouldn't want to watch it for ten years but for a couple of seasons to get us back on track, why not?

I wouldn't want to watch it for a couple of games, let alone seasons.

Online Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10781
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #76 on: March 02, 2016, 10:34:05 PM »
Can were add a vote?
Definitely a no from me.

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #77 on: March 02, 2016, 10:41:40 PM »
It is interesting how the majority view on here seems to be that relegation needs to be avoided at all costs yet the majority view is also that Tony Pulis, the expert at avoiding relegation, should never be Villa manager.

Offline Stirchley Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1033
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #78 on: March 02, 2016, 10:45:02 PM »
Nobody would have saved us. The last of our premier league players departed last summer and none have arrived since.

Richards? Lescott?

Offline walsall villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1977
  • Location: Probably birdwatching
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #79 on: March 02, 2016, 10:49:40 PM »
I would have taken him to halt the slide in the hope of a takeover whilst he was here, then get rid. I wouldn't be so sure he would be that good at getting us back up.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58583
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #80 on: March 02, 2016, 11:22:52 PM »
It is interesting how the majority view on here seems to be that relegation needs to be avoided at all costs yet the majority view is also that Tony Pulis, the expert at avoiding relegation, should never be Villa manager.

It's not that. We all probably know that he's make us solid enough to keep us up. In fact I would guarantee if he took over when Garde did we'd be sat where Albion are or close to that. It's what we'd sacrifice to get there and what we'd ultimately become in years 2 and 3 that would be completely unbearable.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31088
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #81 on: March 02, 2016, 11:33:48 PM »
I would sooner go down than have either Pulis or Pearson.

Allardyce I could stomach for a couple of seasons to stabilise us.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #82 on: March 02, 2016, 11:38:34 PM »
Shit football is shit football.  Whatever Garde's footballing philosophy, it's been atrocious to watch.  I'd sooner see a 1-0 win under Pulis than another depressing tonking under Garde.  If we were comfortably mid-table then I'd say no to Pulis all day long.  But take last night.  5 at the back, two players unsuited to playing wing back at wing back, and the fuck awful Bacuna in midfield.  How exactly would it be any worse under Pulis?

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7253
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #83 on: March 02, 2016, 11:46:03 PM »
I said a few mons ago that Pulis or Allardyce would have had a fighting chance of keeping us up. No need to get married and give them a five year contract, simply let them stabilise the club and when they reach their glass ceiling say thank you and goodbye. West Ham and Palace ( and Stoke) were far stronger when those two left than when they arrived.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31088
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #84 on: March 02, 2016, 11:47:17 PM »
Anichebe in holding midfield and Berahino played as a right sided midfielder with Rickie Lambert 40 yards in front on his own? Or 5 centre halves in a 5-3-2 at the back with a 6 playing in midfield?

They have got results because they have a better equipped squad to battle with. He would not have kept this one up.

Offline Gaztonniller

  • Member
  • Posts: 381
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #85 on: March 03, 2016, 01:42:16 AM »
We took a point off Leicester too remember. WBA are dreadful to watch, full of horrible horrible players and barely register a shot on goal. Alex Ferguson wouldn't have been able to save this sack of shit we've got for a team.

Do you mean horrible in regards to players who know their defensive roles, will make their presence on the pitch known, and capable of grinding out hard won points, then isn't that what the club needs right now especially if looking to get out the championship Nxt season.
Every team needs to have those tough uncompromising (horrible) players capable of rolling their sleeves up on those cold wet windy Tuesday nights at Blackburn, and Pulis brings that.
Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on yr stance) the club needs a Pulis type manager more - to get it back in the prem and retain that position - than Pulis needs the club in it's current predicament.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2016, 01:44:41 AM by Gaztonniller »

Offline Tokyo Sexwhale

  • Member
  • Posts: 3428
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #86 on: March 03, 2016, 02:11:41 AM »
If Pulis can get us 20 points in 10 games, I'd take him.

Otherwise, I wouldn't touch him with a bargepole.  Would rather have Pearson.

Offline Pete

  • Member
  • Posts: 1832
  • Location: Huddersfield
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #87 on: November 20, 2017, 10:38:30 AM »
Pulis is gone. They'll be partying in the streets of Smethwick tonight.

Offline Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23248
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #88 on: November 20, 2017, 10:55:45 AM »
Pulis is gone. They'll be partying in the streets of Smethwick tonight.

It will be just like the Rio carnival with their return to Brazilian type football.

Offline Diablo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2171
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #89 on: November 20, 2017, 11:08:51 AM »
Pulis is gone. They'll be partying in the streets of Smethwick tonight.

It will be just like the Rio carnival with their return to Brazilian type football.
  Awh well - never mind. Pretty certain Pulis would have kept them up this season. Hopefully we can pass them on the way up come the end of the season.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal