Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on January 24, 2016, 11:26:48 AM#AVFC team v #WBA: Bunn, Richards, Okore, Lescott, Cissokho, Bacuna, Gana, Westwood, Gil, Ayew, Kozak. #WBAAVLNow adding Veretout and Gestede who by the way was only on the pitch for a few minutes can someone tell me where the £84m of talent is there?Is he taking the piss?He is just deflecting blame He also mentioned amount of games they played and they are looking to stay in the league so every point matters...
#AVFC team v #WBA: Bunn, Richards, Okore, Lescott, Cissokho, Bacuna, Gana, Westwood, Gil, Ayew, Kozak. #WBAAVLNow adding Veretout and Gestede who by the way was only on the pitch for a few minutes can someone tell me where the £84m of talent is there?Is he taking the piss?
What an awful game of football - West Midlands football is in a seriously shite state of affairs.Absolutely fuming with Tony Pulis - I cannot ****** stand him at times. Why we settle for a 0-0 against a team who aren't far off dead and buried and cannot win a game of football is beyond me. You were by the far the better side and should have won the game. In hindsight, it'll be a better point for us than yourselves.You should have had a penalty (stonewall) and Richards should have been sent off too. Lescott and Okore were very good and bullied our forwards although Rondon was left isolated with no support whatsoever.Aside from that there wasn't much else to comment on. We were a typical Pulis side and you had plenty of industry but very little quality. Despite all your possession I never feared that a goal was coming, thankfully.
Albion spent money than us in the summer given they didn't sell Berahino in the end.Rondon was about 12m wasn't he? Good striker who should do well in this league but being stifiled by PulisBall.And they also have an 8m defender who can't get off the bench, James Chester.Johnny Evans was about 7m aswell although he's been excellent, would've loved him here.So yeah 30m.The trouble with Pulis is he's very much from the MON mould of spending huge amounts on limited safety first British players. Yes it's good enough to keep you up and I respect him for that but eventually fans want more.You see that at Stoke. Despite always keeping them in the premier league, they didn't once finish in the top half under him. Mark Hughes comes in and comfortably does it despite spending way less than Pulis and playing much better football.
Quote from: The Edge on January 24, 2016, 02:50:05 PMQuote from: mr underhill on January 24, 2016, 02:39:34 PMI would however, much prefer their league position10/10 for stating the obvious. Lol...So would I, but not if it meant being managed by Pulis
Quote from: mr underhill on January 24, 2016, 02:39:34 PMI would however, much prefer their league position10/10 for stating the obvious.
I would however, much prefer their league position
Quote from: ozzjim on January 24, 2016, 02:58:43 PMQuote from: The Edge on January 24, 2016, 02:50:05 PMQuote from: mr underhill on January 24, 2016, 02:39:34 PMI would however, much prefer their league position10/10 for stating the obvious. Lol...So would I, but not if it meant being managed by PulisPulis is the footballing equivalent of the anti-Christ. I can sum this up in one. I would rather have McLeish back. There I've said it.
Quote from: The Edge on January 24, 2016, 08:27:58 PMQuote from: ozzjim on January 24, 2016, 02:58:43 PMQuote from: The Edge on January 24, 2016, 02:50:05 PMQuote from: mr underhill on January 24, 2016, 02:39:34 PMI would however, much prefer their league position10/10 for stating the obvious. Lol...So would I, but not if it meant being managed by PulisPulis is the footballing equivalent of the anti-Christ. I can sum this up in one. I would rather have McLeish back. There I've said it. You know, so would I. At least he didn't wear a fucking cap.
Quote from: SoccerHQ on January 24, 2016, 03:53:04 PMAlbion spent money than us in the summer given they didn't sell Berahino in the end.Rondon was about 12m wasn't he? Good striker who should do well in this league but being stifiled by PulisBall.And they also have an 8m defender who can't get off the bench, James Chester.Johnny Evans was about 7m aswell although he's been excellent, would've loved him here.So yeah 30m.The trouble with Pulis is he's very much from the MON mould of spending huge amounts on limited safety first British players. Yes it's good enough to keep you up and I respect him for that but eventually fans want more.You see that at Stoke. Despite always keeping them in the premier league, they didn't once finish in the top half under him. Mark Hughes comes in and comfortably does it despite spending way less than Pulis and playing much better football.I agree with you here.Pulis laid a solid foundation at Stoke for Hughes to come in and build on. The spine of the Stoke side and back four was largely built by Pulis and hasn't needed any major repair work. Hughes simply managed to come in, spend some money on some forward players and Stoke have been better for it.I'm hoping Pulis will do the same here - I don't think I could stomach five more years (as he wants) of this mind-numbing football. Unfortunately, he is pretty much a guarantee to keep us up and that will please the chairman. The fact that fans won't be renewing next year (I'm debating mine) won't bother him at all.