If I agreed with scarf chucking, and I don't, I am keeping my Wembley scarf only ever to wear for a Wembley victory that might erase the pain of when I wore it last.
Quote from: brian green on January 04, 2016, 03:52:37 PMIf I agreed with scarf chucking, and I don't, I am keeping my Wembley scarf only ever to wear for a Wembley victory that might erase the pain of when I wore it last. If i agreed with the scarf chucking i'd cut it in half and chuck the bright future half back.
WE WANT OUT VILLA BACK!
Quote from: ez on January 04, 2016, 07:56:07 PMQuote from: brian green on January 04, 2016, 03:52:37 PMIf I agreed with scarf chucking, and I don't, I am keeping my Wembley scarf only ever to wear for a Wembley victory that might erase the pain of when I wore it last. If i agreed with the scarf chucking i'd cut it in half and chuck the bright future half back.Which is a quite brilliant idea. One might also wipe ones arse on the proud history part as that is what Mr Lerner seems to be doing.
Quote from: Legion on January 04, 2016, 06:57:09 PMWE WANT OUT VILLA BACK!Ok here is your chance, I bet less than 50
Quote from: Dave on January 04, 2016, 10:55:50 AMQuote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:25:19 AMI'd favour more direct action. Invade the pitch and stop a match. Won't solve anything, won't help the team (but they're beyond help now, so we shouldn't worry about upsetting the lazy little lightweights), probably won't even be seen by Randy ( or his purse string, legacy-controlling mother) but might help fans to let off steam. No point having a polite demo that gets no attention. Unless they think that it's worth a three-year banning order to let off some steam, they might be better off taking up boxing or maybe having a massage.A 3 year banning order from watching Villa? it would be a relief for some. Pitch invasion is the only action to get noticed. Those worried about it could wave their scarves at a statue
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:25:19 AMI'd favour more direct action. Invade the pitch and stop a match. Won't solve anything, won't help the team (but they're beyond help now, so we shouldn't worry about upsetting the lazy little lightweights), probably won't even be seen by Randy ( or his purse string, legacy-controlling mother) but might help fans to let off steam. No point having a polite demo that gets no attention. Unless they think that it's worth a three-year banning order to let off some steam, they might be better off taking up boxing or maybe having a massage.
I'd favour more direct action. Invade the pitch and stop a match. Won't solve anything, won't help the team (but they're beyond help now, so we shouldn't worry about upsetting the lazy little lightweights), probably won't even be seen by Randy ( or his purse string, legacy-controlling mother) but might help fans to let off steam. No point having a polite demo that gets no attention.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on January 04, 2016, 08:31:04 PMQuote from: Legion on January 04, 2016, 06:57:09 PMWE WANT OUT VILLA BACK!Ok here is your chance, I bet less than 50Way less
Quote from: Dave on January 04, 2016, 11:01:37 AMQuote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:59:22 AMQuote from: Dave on January 04, 2016, 10:55:50 AMQuote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:25:19 AMI'd favour more direct action. Invade the pitch and stop a match. Won't solve anything, won't help the team (but they're beyond help now, so we shouldn't worry about upsetting the lazy little lightweights), probably won't even be seen by Randy ( or his purse string, legacy-controlling mother) but might help fans to let off steam. No point having a polite demo that gets no attention. Unless they think that it's worth a three-year banning order to let off some steam, they might be better off taking up boxing or maybe having a massage.A 3 year banning order from watching Villa? it would be a relief for some. Pitch invasion is the only action to get noticed. Those worried about it could wave their scarves at a statue*shrugs*In which case, go for it. I'm not saying that I'm going for it ( I've got enough selfies of me on the pitch after the Albion game last season, ta very much, and I'm still dreading the 6 oclock knock after the Southampton invasion in 1994), but there are times when direct action is the only way to be heard. Even if it changes nothing, the thought of Fox ( or, if a miracle should happen and Randy is exhumed from his Ohio bat cave and attends a Villa game), has to sit and watch a few hundred people giving him dogs' abuse in front of his corporate chums, it might be a small victory. And it might make a lot of fans feels a bit better. Or we could just slip meekly out of the league without a whimper.
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:59:22 AMQuote from: Dave on January 04, 2016, 10:55:50 AMQuote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 04, 2016, 10:25:19 AMI'd favour more direct action. Invade the pitch and stop a match. Won't solve anything, won't help the team (but they're beyond help now, so we shouldn't worry about upsetting the lazy little lightweights), probably won't even be seen by Randy ( or his purse string, legacy-controlling mother) but might help fans to let off steam. No point having a polite demo that gets no attention. Unless they think that it's worth a three-year banning order to let off some steam, they might be better off taking up boxing or maybe having a massage.A 3 year banning order from watching Villa? it would be a relief for some. Pitch invasion is the only action to get noticed. Those worried about it could wave their scarves at a statue*shrugs*In which case, go for it.
At the final whistle of ***insert name of any team here**** game everyone should stay in their seats but turn around with their back facing the pitch in silence, nothing abusive just 35,000 facing the opposite direction.