Tom Fox's meeting with Supporters

[Clampy]

Still bitter about that I see.

Aren't you? As a supporter aren't you bitter that we were deceived?
[/quote]

No, I'm glad we got some money for the lying twat at all, but we've been through this already and I don't really want to again.

[Chris Harte]

Still bitter about that I see.

Aren't you? As a supporter aren't you bitter that we were deceived?

No, I'm glad we got some money for the lying twat at all, but we've been through this already and I don't really want to again.
[/quote]
Well then feel free not to respond to a reply someone else's question.

[dave.woodhall]

Because that is what GM's is for here and for AVST members with my other hat on.

I'm a former member of both. I suppose an update for such a person is out of the question? It's not like current members of both get the info twice.

Every time there's a meeting like this we get the same "I demand to be told" statements. There is no official them and us-ism on here. If you donate to the site you get access to another forum and if a member wants to divulge something in there that they don't want to say in public I'm fine with that but I wouldn't ask them to do anything one way or the other. If the Trust want to say anything to their members or nothing at all it's up to their board to decide.

It was hardly a demand though, was it?

Why mention it then?

It was a simple question.

Why imply it was a demand when it wasn't?

Why get so heated about a word? Whether it was a demand, a query, a request or a proclamation, the principle is still the same.

[Chris Harte]

Because that is what GM's is for here and for AVST members with my other hat on.

I'm a former member of both. I suppose an update for such a person is out of the question? It's not like current members of both get the info twice.

Every time there's a meeting like this we get the same "I demand to be told" statements. There is no official them and us-ism on here. If you donate to the site you get access to another forum and if a member wants to divulge something in there that they don't want to say in public I'm fine with that but I wouldn't ask them to do anything one way or the other. If the Trust want to say anything to their members or nothing at all it's up to their board to decide.

It was hardly a demand though, was it?

Why mention it then?

It was a simple question.

Why imply it was a demand when it wasn't?

Why get so heated about a word? Whether it was a demand, a query, a request or a proclamation, the principle is still the same.

Why use the word at all?

[Clampy]

Still bitter about that I see.

Aren't you? As a supporter aren't you bitter that we were deceived?

No, I'm glad we got some money for the lying twat at all, but we've been through this already and I don't really want to again.

Well then feel free not to respond to a reply someone else's question.
[/quote]

Not sure what you mean, but ok.

[dave.woodhall]

Because that is what GM's is for here and for AVST members with my other hat on.

I'm a former member of both. I suppose an update for such a person is out of the question? It's not like current members of both get the info twice.

Every time there's a meeting like this we get the same "I demand to be told" statements. There is no official them and us-ism on here. If you donate to the site you get access to another forum and if a member wants to divulge something in there that they don't want to say in public I'm fine with that but I wouldn't ask them to do anything one way or the other. If the Trust want to say anything to their members or nothing at all it's up to their board to decide.

It was hardly a demand though, was it?

Why mention it then?

It was a simple question.

Why imply it was a demand when it wasn't?

Why get so heated about a word? Whether it was a demand, a query, a request or a proclamation, the principle is still the same.

Why use the word at all?

Because I can't spell enquiry. Now that's cleared up, perhaps we can move on.

[evalast1910]

Because that is what GM's is for here and for AVST members with my other hat on.

I'm a former member of both. I suppose an update for such a person is out of the question? It's not like current members of both get the info twice.

Every time there's a meeting like this we get the same "I demand to be told" statements. There is no official them and us-ism on here. If you donate to the site you get access to another forum and if a member wants to divulge something in there that they don't want to say in public I'm fine with that but I wouldn't ask them to do anything one way or the other. If the Trust want to say anything to their members or nothing at all it's up to their board to decide.

It was hardly a demand though, was it?

Why mention it then?

It was a simple question.

Why imply it was a demand when it wasn't?

Why get so heated about a word? Whether it was a demand, a query, a request or a proclamation, the principle is still the same.

Why use the word at all?

Because I can't spell enquiry. Now that's cleared up, perhaps we can move on.

Back on topic there was a few more things suggested; to do with the media and certain players.

[Dave]

Well then feel free not to respond to a reply someone else's question.

Well you did choose to bring the subject up, completely at random and out of context of what was being discussed.

[Chris Harte]

Well then feel free not to respond to a reply someone else's question.

Well you did choose to bring the subject up, completely at random and out of context of what was being discussed.

It was more a comparison. To make a comparison sometimes you need to bring up other things that are not necessarily to do with the subject. Sorry for any confusion caused.

My point being that even if they were told that about transfer funds at the meeting its probably bollocks anyway.

[curlytailavfc]

Is it live at local comedy club

[Chris Harte]

Back on topic there was a few more things suggested; to do with the media and certain players.

What are you getting at? Or are you on a wind up here?

[evalast1910]

Back on topic there was a few more things suggested; to do with the media and certain players.

What are you getting at? Or are you on a wind up here?

Sherwood didn't rate Veretout as a Prem player and wanted to sell Gil. All the bad media the club is getting all started once Sherwood knew he was out of a job.

[Chris Harte]

Sherwood didn't rate Veretout as a Prem player and wanted to sell Gil. All the bad media the club is getting all started once Sherwood knew he was out of a job.

Hmm.... okay, so I can see that as an opinion on Veretout, but wanting to sell Gil? I'm not sure on that.

[evalast1910]

Sherwood didn't rate Veretout as a Prem player and wanted to sell Gil. All the bad media the club is getting all started once Sherwood knew he was out of a job.

Hmm.... okay, so I can see that as an opinion on Veretout, but wanting to sell Gil? I'm not sure on that.

Believe what you want that's fine Chris however we all know your the one on a wind up look at your posts on this thread....... Look how you have treated reasonable and calm people on this thread like Dave and Dave Wodall trying to start a argument for no reason.

[dave.woodhall]

Can you please not call me reasonable and calm? It's not far from there to generous and warm-hearted, which could ruin a reputation.