What I am struggling to understand is how, having written off loans of £90m, we still have a net debt of £100m. To be honest, I have not followed the accounts closely and missed any comments on here 12 months ago about this.It was reported that Lerner wanted £150m for the club but is this really £250m with the debt.
Quote from: old man villa fan on February 01, 2016, 09:53:53 PMWhat I am struggling to understand is how, having written off loans of £90m, we still have a net debt of £100m. To be honest, I have not followed the accounts closely and missed any comments on here 12 months ago about this.It was reported that Lerner wanted £150m for the club but is this really £250m with the debt.His total investment is over 250 million, including purchase of 65millio and loans of 200million + some of which he has capitalised.The trust has been taking interest and management charges so his real exposure is estimated 230 to 270, without seein the latest accounts difficult to be exact.He put it on the market for 250+, dropped to 200+ and then had no takers at 150.There were discussions (allegedly at 90million).
With what Hollis has said in recent weeks, the whole thing at the moment has the feeling of a closing down sale. Not sure if others feel that way.
Don't know if it has been posted before but just looked him up on Wikipedia and his occupation is listed as "gutless coward" 😊
Quote from: ChicagoLion on February 02, 2016, 12:05:59 AMQuote from: old man villa fan on February 01, 2016, 09:53:53 PMWhat I am struggling to understand is how, having written off loans of £90m, we still have a net debt of £100m. To be honest, I have not followed the accounts closely and missed any comments on here 12 months ago about this.It was reported that Lerner wanted £150m for the club but is this really £250m with the debt.His total investment is over 250 million, including purchase of 65millio and loans of 200million + some of which he has capitalised.The trust has been taking interest and management charges so his real exposure is estimated 230 to 270, without seein the latest accounts difficult to be exact.He put it on the market for 250+, dropped to 200+ and then had no takers at 150.There were discussions (allegedly at 90million).I thought all of those had been waived after the first couple of years?
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on February 02, 2016, 12:10:04 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on February 02, 2016, 12:05:59 AMQuote from: old man villa fan on February 01, 2016, 09:53:53 PMWhat I am struggling to understand is how, having written off loans of £90m, we still have a net debt of £100m. To be honest, I have not followed the accounts closely and missed any comments on here 12 months ago about this.It was reported that Lerner wanted £150m for the club but is this really £250m with the debt.His total investment is over 250 million, including purchase of 65millio and loans of 200million + some of which he has capitalised.The trust has been taking interest and management charges so his real exposure is estimated 230 to 270, without seein the latest accounts difficult to be exact.He put it on the market for 250+, dropped to 200+ and then had no takers at 150.There were discussions (allegedly at 90million).I thought all of those had been waived after the first couple of years?You might be right but there were significant charges in the first years.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on February 02, 2016, 12:33:43 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on February 02, 2016, 12:10:04 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on February 02, 2016, 12:05:59 AMQuote from: old man villa fan on February 01, 2016, 09:53:53 PMWhat I am struggling to understand is how, having written off loans of £90m, we still have a net debt of £100m. To be honest, I have not followed the accounts closely and missed any comments on here 12 months ago about this.It was reported that Lerner wanted £150m for the club but is this really £250m with the debt.His total investment is over 250 million, including purchase of 65millio and loans of 200million + some of which he has capitalised.The trust has been taking interest and management charges so his real exposure is estimated 230 to 270, without seein the latest accounts difficult to be exact.He put it on the market for 250+, dropped to 200+ and then had no takers at 150.There were discussions (allegedly at 90million).I thought all of those had been waived after the first couple of years?You might be right but there were significant charges in the first years.I know for one season, it may have been 2009/10 that there were £7.7m in management fees.
Quote from: BC Villain on February 01, 2016, 11:49:37 PMWith what Hollis has said in recent weeks, the whole thing at the moment has the feeling of a closing down sale. Not sure if others feel that way.No point having a go at Lerner, he is now totally removed. Hollis has been brought in to ensure the books balance and I had a sneaky feeling all along that bringing players in this window would be reliant on the bigger earners such as N'Zogbia and Agbonlahor being moved on.
Thought to be the worst chairman in Aston Villa history with a poor record and not a single trophy to his name.