Quote from: cdbullyweefan on October 05, 2015, 08:05:13 PMHe quite clearly doesn't like Sanchez. He hardly used him last year when we had Cleverley, and for some unfathomable reason he seems to think that Ashley "the most average footballer of all time" Westwood is the answer. The whole side is completely unbalanced with no discernible plan.
He quite clearly doesn't like Sanchez. He hardly used him last year when we had Cleverley, and for some unfathomable reason he seems to think that Ashley "the most average footballer of all time" Westwood is the answer.
Randy and Roman should do a swap manager deal
Swansea at home is this year's Bolton.
I normally err on the side of caution. My natural inclination is to give them time (see years worth of comments re Houllier, TSM1 and TSM2.I can't do it this time. There are no signs of light at the end of the tunnel. I can take them looking terrible to start and gradually improving. I can't take us getting progressively worse and that is where we are currently.With each passing game we get worse. Whether that be in the starting 11 or conviction in attack. If there were signs of a turnaround just round the corner I would back him. But there aren't. Even when you look at a game and take some positives from it, he doesn't use those to his advantage to find the winning formula. He bins them in the hope of completely changing what went wrong.He is out of his depth and, if we give him another month, are giving ourselves a mountain to climb to get out of it.To be like Sugar with an Apprentice sacking:"Tim, I wanted it to work. I really did. But, as the process has gone on, it is clear this is just too much for you. Thanks for keeping us up and I will watch your career in future with interest. But it is not your time. With regret, Tim, You're Fired".
On the BBC interview, when asked about the Stoke goal, he just sort of shook his body and at once looked pissed off/clueless/arrogant/out of his depth. He is, as Roy Keane might say, a bluffer.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on October 05, 2015, 09:51:43 PMOn the BBC interview, when asked about the Stoke goal, he just sort of shook his body and at once looked pissed off/clueless/arrogant/out of his depth. He is, as Roy Keane might say, a bluffer.It's arrogance and it winds me up. He acts like Mourinho but he hasn't earned the right to be so conceited. If he showed a bit more humility then the fans may a bit more patient than perhaps we are. When he's won leagues/cups and proved himself capable, he can act how he likes (to a degree), but right now he looks to all the world like a bullshitter who's being found out.
So...it seems Tim Sherwood doesn't know Tim Sherwoods best team so what would we all go with?I was in favour of wing backs but Saturday reminded me how dreadfully negative a formation it is when the inevitable happens and 3 becomes 5 at the back with lots of marking of fresh air.Think we have to concentrate on 4-2-3-1 now and for a manager & backroom staff packed with good quality centre mids it is absolutely essential that the 2 in front of back 4 are strong, fit & capable of playing the role...novelty of tracking runners :-) GuzanHutton Richards Clark Amavi Sanchez Gana Veretout Traore Ayew GestedeSubs; Bunn, Okore, Lescott, Gardner, Gil, Greaish, GabbyGuzan needs genuine competition, not sure Bunn was bought to play & it shows in Guzans performances (though his handling was better on Sat)Hutton or Bacuna at RB is tomato tomaytoe - can Ilori or Crespo play RB?Clark over Okore but no LescottWestwood get the reward his form deserves....a seat in the standSanchez & Gana holding - Gardner on bench to replace Sanchez after an hour...need him to step up and show that he can play that role after 6 months doing it at Forest.Traore in the '10' role - direct at goal driving and dribbling through the centre - Grealish or Gil not done enough to justify next chanceAyew in the attacking three - give him a chance, Gabby there on bench to come on and run the channels (not threaten the goal obv) but he is an attacker who does his work going backwards which is something Sinclair / Grealish / Gil don't do properly.
Quote from: cheltenhamlion on October 05, 2015, 06:20:26 PMI normally err on the side of caution. My natural inclination is to give them time (see years worth of comments re Houllier, TSM1 and TSM2.I can't do it this time. There are no signs of light at the end of the tunnel. I can take them looking terrible to start and gradually improving. I can't take us getting progressively worse and that is where we are currently.With each passing game we get worse. Whether that be in the starting 11 or conviction in attack. If there were signs of a turnaround just round the corner I would back him. But there aren't. Even when you look at a game and take some positives from it, he doesn't use those to his advantage to find the winning formula. He bins them in the hope of completely changing what went wrong.He is out of his depth and, if we give him another month, are giving ourselves a mountain to climb to get out of it.To be like Sugar with an Apprentice sacking:"Tim, I wanted it to work. I really did. But, as the process has gone on, it is clear this is just too much for you. Thanks for keeping us up and I will watch your career in future with interest. But it is not your time. With regret, Tim, You're Fired".Absolutely spot on. I too back Lambert until almost the end. This chancer needs to go now before it's too later. Wait until Christmas and we'll have gone.