collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: International Rugby  (Read 388626 times)

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #945 on: March 14, 2016, 02:27:35 PM »
Marler now also cited for striking so I think it's a given he's missing next week and probably out for most of the rest of the season if there's reasonable evidence against him.

Where this becomes a big deal is that I just don't trust Mako V, he's terrible in the scrum and will be a big weakness for us.  Matt Mullan is likely to come onto the bench, which i'm ok with I really would like us to have a prop who is decent in the scrum as an option as well, particularly against France.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #946 on: March 18, 2016, 01:40:40 PM »
I'm amazed that Marler has been given a green light, the striking citation I agree with their verdict, there was nothing in it but the 'racism' (in quotes because I don't think he was intentionally being racist, I think it was a badly considered joke and it was taken that way by Lee) one seems pretty controversial.  As said, I think it was intended as a joke and I think everyone involved knows that but it was picked up on a mic and widely reported and therefore became bigger than that.  That World Rugby have asked the 6 Nations to explain the decision suggests that this might not be over because I think the credibility of the sport in regards to anti-racism is something that will be heavily considered.  It does mean that Marler and Lee will be, in my opinion, turned into pawns but a minimum 4 week ban (with the standard clause to reduce on 'character so probably 2-3 weeks) and a slap on the wrist would've seen it dealt with and should've been the verdict, something like:

"in reaching this decision we have taken in to consideration the intention behind the comments and his character and disciplinary record but we felt it necessary to remind the player of his responsibility as a professional sportsman and to ensure that we remain committed to opposing racism in all forms."

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 13129
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #947 on: March 18, 2016, 01:43:40 PM »
I'm just trying to imagine what the reaction would have been from the rugby fraternity and the tabloids if an England footballer had punched someone during a match and made a potentially racist comment. 

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 9608
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #948 on: March 19, 2016, 07:56:31 PM »
Excited by this.  Scotland v Ireland was a great warm up, a cracker in fact (the score should have been closer imo). 
Now the main event.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #949 on: March 19, 2016, 08:05:42 PM »
Owens has got that penalty against Itoje wrong, should've been the other way for holding on, Itoje's initial shape and position was perfect.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #950 on: March 19, 2016, 08:11:44 PM »
Brown shows again why I don't rate him, Watson should've been in to score under the posts there but instead he threw it away into midfield.

Online DaveD

  • Member
  • Posts: 2111
  • Location: Waltham Abbey
    • Twitter
  • GM : 26.12.2015
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #951 on: March 19, 2016, 08:14:48 PM »
Care makes up for a couple of piss poor box kicks

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #952 on: March 19, 2016, 08:15:52 PM »
Sucker punch that but it's fucking awful defence from France.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 9608
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #953 on: March 19, 2016, 08:16:09 PM »
Agree with both of those posts Paul-e.  Brown lacks awareness.

That said, I was about to slag Care off on here for his poor box kicks and then he snipes a try under the posts.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #954 on: March 19, 2016, 08:20:26 PM »
I don't think you can give Care all that much credit, a gap that wide 25 yards out I suspect any professional 9 scores.  I'm not belittling him scoring but it was an absolute gift.

That Trinh-Duc injury is nasty, not sure it needed 2 replays.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49533
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #955 on: March 19, 2016, 08:22:36 PM »
Very open game this.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #956 on: March 19, 2016, 08:24:41 PM »
Fair play to Dan Cole but should be disallowed, definite blocking.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #957 on: March 19, 2016, 08:28:19 PM »
Another appalling box kick, Care, despite the try, has been poor.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49533
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #958 on: March 19, 2016, 08:32:41 PM »
Giving away careless penalites at the moment. We need to get our heads together.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 9608
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Six Nations 2016
« Reply #959 on: March 19, 2016, 08:49:19 PM »
could be a crucial 3 points here.  12-20 feels a significantly better than 12-17.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal