Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2016, 03:28:00 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on January 01, 2016, 02:24:49 PMQuote from: Clampy on January 01, 2016, 01:33:38 PMA loan signing that didn't work out. It's hardly the end of the world. Nobody claimed it was the end of the world just that it was yet again another shite signing by the Villa. And people are going on about it like shite signings are somehow an Aston Villa thing, and that no other club does it. Which couldn't be further from the truth.I think this is one of the things we excell at. This is why we are bottom of the 92 team league.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on January 01, 2016, 02:24:49 PMQuote from: Clampy on January 01, 2016, 01:33:38 PMA loan signing that didn't work out. It's hardly the end of the world. Nobody claimed it was the end of the world just that it was yet again another shite signing by the Villa. And people are going on about it like shite signings are somehow an Aston Villa thing, and that no other club does it. Which couldn't be further from the truth.
Quote from: Clampy on January 01, 2016, 01:33:38 PMA loan signing that didn't work out. It's hardly the end of the world. Nobody claimed it was the end of the world just that it was yet again another shite signing by the Villa.
A loan signing that didn't work out. It's hardly the end of the world.
How any one can suggest that a huge part of the problem is not because of the players that have been playing for the first X1 is mind bogging lay crazy. Only Jack Grealish is a regular that did not get signed.We have the worst them in the League made up of players we signed, it's that simple.
Bottom of what 92 team league?
Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2016, 04:00:51 PMBottom of what 92 team league?Haha...If you remove the divisions and make a table of 92 we are bottom because of only 8 points. However with 5 games in hand over Yeovil who only have 14 from 24 we are in with a shout of being the second worst!
Quote from: olaftab on January 01, 2016, 05:11:28 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2016, 04:00:51 PMBottom of what 92 team league?Haha...If you remove the divisions and make a table of 92 we are bottom because of only 8 points. However with 5 games in hand over Yeovil who only have 14 from 24 we are in with a shout of being the second worst!Bottom over 2015 across all 4 leagues and worst points toll in a year of any Villa team except a year when we only played 28 games.These records just keep on comming, and we have another half season and a brand new year to set some more.Hip Hip
Quote from: ChicagoLion on January 01, 2016, 06:57:57 PMQuote from: olaftab on January 01, 2016, 05:11:28 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2016, 04:00:51 PMBottom of what 92 team league?Haha...If you remove the divisions and make a table of 92 we are bottom because of only 8 points. However with 5 games in hand over Yeovil who only have 14 from 24 we are in with a shout of being the second worst!Bottom over 2015 across all 4 leagues and worst points toll in a year of any Villa team except a year when we only played 28 games.These records just keep on comming, and we have another half season and a brand new year to set some more.Hip HipYes because it works like that, and we are in one league. You can literally make stats out of anything and any circumstance if you want to be miserable enough. I mean why limit it to the 92 clubs and go to Europe and include South Anerican clubs too. I bet we are super duper extra shit.
Of course it isn't. A league of leagues is pretty straightforward and if Blues or Albion were at the bottom we'd all be having a good laugh at their expense.
Quote from: not3bad on January 01, 2016, 07:54:27 PMOf course it isn't. A league of leagues is pretty straightforward and if Blues or Albion were at the bottom we'd all be having a good laugh at their expense.it's nonsense because not every club plays each other. Or are you saying that if we did play every club in this hypothetical 92 team league we'd be bottom? Because, and just my opinion, that would be the most nonsensical thing ever considered on here and we've had some doozies.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2016, 08:01:50 PMQuote from: not3bad on January 01, 2016, 07:54:27 PMOf course it isn't. A league of leagues is pretty straightforward and if Blues or Albion were at the bottom we'd all be having a good laugh at their expense.it's nonsense because not every club plays each other. Or are you saying that if we did play every club in this hypothetical 92 team league we'd be bottom? Because, and just my opinion, that would be the most nonsensical thing ever considered on here and we've had some doozies.It's not nonsense at all to have a list of wins, draws and losses of all the teams in the English league and assemble them into a "league" so you can look at comparative performance. Of course it is only symbolic, of course it doesn't mean we're a weaker team than someone like Aldershot, the combined squad value of whom would probably be less than one of Villa's ball boys. It's a symbolic league but it effectively illustrates how literally shit we are.