Quote from: Villafirst on September 27, 2015, 06:47:58 PMDoesn't bother me one bit his lack of mobility, he's a goalscorer with a 1 in 2 ratio. He just needs decent service. He's still getting match fit - judge him when he's fully up to speed. I banged on enough about how *just* scoring wasn't good enough to Bent so that rule should also be applied to Gestede. Luckily for him he cost a fraction of the amount and with his height it would not be hard for him to add something extra (even if that is just defending corners).
Doesn't bother me one bit his lack of mobility, he's a goalscorer with a 1 in 2 ratio. He just needs decent service. He's still getting match fit - judge him when he's fully up to speed.
From what I see he is no good in the air with long ball from defenders or goalkeeper
Quote from: paul_e on September 27, 2015, 12:59:43 AMI've said this before, there are 2 types of strikers, ones who can play with their back to goal and ones that can't. All the other differences are largely insignificant in terms of play style, you either have a striker you play off who has his back to goal a lot and can bring people into play and be a focal point or you have a striker that you work around and play balls into his path. The issue is Gestede, like Kozak, looks like he should be one of the former but he's not, get the ball in front of him where he can attack it and he scores goals, he has 4 which highlight that perfectly. Play long punts up to him and expect him running into corners or winning flickons and you'll be disappointed.Although I get your point what you are describing are just players with two different playing styles. Such as a Withe and Shaw. Both players, and ALL forwards, can play with their back to the goal as they do it for the vast majority of the 90 minutes. Where they do their best work is what you're getting at and asking Gary Shaw to win balls in the air is never going to be his forte. But every forward knows how to receive the ball with their backs to goal because they've been doing it their entire career.
I've said this before, there are 2 types of strikers, ones who can play with their back to goal and ones that can't. All the other differences are largely insignificant in terms of play style, you either have a striker you play off who has his back to goal a lot and can bring people into play and be a focal point or you have a striker that you work around and play balls into his path. The issue is Gestede, like Kozak, looks like he should be one of the former but he's not, get the ball in front of him where he can attack it and he scores goals, he has 4 which highlight that perfectly. Play long punts up to him and expect him running into corners or winning flickons and you'll be disappointed.
Quote from: Salsa Party Animal on September 28, 2015, 12:44:04 AM From what I see he is no good in the air with long ball from defenders or goalkeeperA lot of that has to do with Guzan not being able to reach him. His kicks barely reach the halfway line, which makes it very hard for a striker. Guzan's kicks are floaters as well, which again makes it difficult. The striker has to make up ten yards towards his own goal and and try and compete with a player in front of him.
The goals are great but he appears to have two 50 pence pieces for feet.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on September 28, 2015, 09:34:29 PMThe goals are great but he appears to have two 50 pence pieces for feet.Who cares as long as he scores goals.