Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.Are we talking about the same player? 5ft 10, ten stone, built-like-he's-made-out-of-wet-tissue-paper Joe Bennett has the physical attributes to be a centre-back?
Bennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.You think? I think he's decent on the ball, but far too weedy to be a centre-half.
Quote from: Dave on July 13, 2015, 12:40:05 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.Are we talking about the same player? 5ft 10, ten stone, built-like-he's-made-out-of-wet-tissue-paper Joe Bennett has the physical attributes to be a centre-back?More than he has to be a full back yes. What's up with you anyway?
Quote from: Dave on July 13, 2015, 12:40:05 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.Are we talking about the same player? 5ft 10, ten stone, built-like-he's-made-out-of-wet-tissue-paper Joe Bennett has the physical attributes to be a centre-back?Joe Bennett, who makes Walter from Dennis The |Menace look like Shaun Teale. I confess I'm at a loss to see what he's seeing...
Quote from: Percy McCarthy on July 13, 2015, 12:42:47 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.You think? I think he's decent on the ball, but far too weedy to be a centre-half.From what I've seen he's a bit of a clogger, generally you see far more successful cloggers at centre back than fullback. Not saying he would be perfect there either mind!
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:41:49 PMQuote from: Dave on July 13, 2015, 12:40:05 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on July 13, 2015, 12:34:08 PMBennett is too slow and immobile to be a full back, but on the other hand you wouldn't want to try him at centre back either as he's to prone to mistakes. He does have more of the physical attributes for that role though.Are we talking about the same player? 5ft 10, ten stone, built-like-he's-made-out-of-wet-tissue-paper Joe Bennett has the physical attributes to be a centre-back?More than he has to be a full back yes. What's up with you anyway?I don't think that anything's up with me.Just slightly taken aback by the suggestion that the smallest, weediest defender currently on our books should be touted as having the physical attributes to play centre-back.
The only issue I have with a signing like this that its another very young player who has no English League experience. I understand that at the moment we have to go down the route of buying on the cheap, but a big reason why we have struggled over the past few years because of throwing too many in experience players in at the deep end. For all the stick Richardson gets at least he does have the years under his belt and as he proved in the Cup Final can put in a good shift. I just think we need to find the right balance between youth and experience.
Personally I've never seen the kid as a full back, and I don't see him as quite as weedy as made out. Clark is hardly a brick wall but most on here think he's improved. Bennett is probably not up to it at this level in any position so it's a pointless argument really.