I thought you made it clear from your username that you would never mention that man's name ever again. Shame on you.
You can argue about the source for ages, and we have. But if we went down this season it would nearly all be on Lambert. How ever much he spent, was restricted with wages etc because of things before he was here, he had this side massively underperforming. Look at Sherwood, in 8 league games we've scored 12, same as we did in 25 under Lambert, that is how much Lambert was failing.
If the unthinkable happens and this is the season, who would you blame?. Personally i think the rot really set in when Oneill wasted huge amounts of Randy`s cash which left the managers who followed him with virtually no transfer budget, But to be fair to MON, any manager would have done the same if allowed. He should have been stopped and when he eventually was (being denied the money from Milners transfer) he walked, Faulkner was the Lerner intermediary, he was CEO and was there when the money was spent and the damage was done, he was advising Randy so should have reigned O`neill in much earlier - but didnt, so my vote goes on Faulkner.
Surely Fox should be added to the options. I've voted Lerner but I think Fox was to blame for not sacking Lambert before January and then attacking the fans with that 'false narrative' nonsense.Anyway after today's result hopefully blame will not be required.
Is it not possible for it to be the fault of more than one person?If we go down (and we almost certainly won't), then at least three people on that list would have a good deal of culpability.
Lerner for three poor managerial appointments on the bounce, particularly for letting the third one drag out for so long and Lambert for being awful results wise for pretty much the whole of his time at the club.
Quote from: Damo70 on April 11, 2015, 05:31:26 PMLerner for three poor managerial appointments on the bounce, particularly for letting the third one drag out for so long and Lambert for being awful results wise for pretty much the whole of his time at the club.But most of us wanted, or were happy with, Lambert so it wasn't really a poor appointment. Keeping him so long was stupid though.