collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Fantastic Mr Fox  (Read 13373 times)

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58631
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #60 on: May 01, 2015, 02:37:32 PM »
I really don't think the gap between us and say finishing 8th is that wide. If we played all season like we have recently then mid table security would be easily achieved. Selling Benteke this summer for £35m for example if invested well would allow us to close that gap. Let's face it, without spending a penny Sherwood has improved our overall play considerably and that is with players who none cost more than £7m. There is so much value in the £5-10m range but you have to be astute to find it and we've not done badly in recent years. The market just gets a little crazy beyond say £15m mark because while you should get better players it simply doesn't always work out that way. See Liverpool and Spurs for massively overinflated spending with a less than spectacular return.

Pedant Alert.  N'Zogbia?

Yes true. Mind you up until Sherwood arrived you and I were worth more than N'Zogbia.

Online Billy Walker

  • Member
  • Posts: 2423
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #61 on: May 01, 2015, 02:50:04 PM »
Seems to be the same conversation on 2 threads so i'll stick this here as well.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within 5 five years he'd still get ripped. And what he says is also true whether we like it or not. We've finished top six 16 times since the end of WW2, less than a quarter of the time. Higher than 6th just the 6 times.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within five years it would fire the whole club up, surely? What's wrong with a bit of ambition and thinking outside the box to get there.  Who knows, a bit of belief and focus could fire us up to do a Dortmund or Atletico.  The problem with making statements that suggest we are settling for average is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: we will attract sponsorship deals on a par with the Southamptons of this world when really we should be getting similar deals (at least) to the likes of Spurs.  Like I say, I appreciate we don't have a divine right to success, but neither has any other club.  Why, by settling for second best, are we making it easier for other clubs to win things?  If this is a short term vision count me in, if it's a long term strategy it makes me ask the question, "What's the point?" 

Those stats about top six finishes are interesting in that I am sure they stand up well against most clubs.  My maths might be wrong here but I think we have had nine top six finishes in the Premier League era compared to Spurs' seven - and that is including the write-offs of the past four seasons.  If we are not competing with the likes of Spurs - at the very least - I really do think we are being sold short.

Offline rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9665
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #62 on: May 01, 2015, 02:54:39 PM »
Mid table next season is a good target, playing attractive football, strengthening the squad on the way, then press on from there.

Yes assuming we stay up that would be a decent target

The same target we set in  2011-12, 12-13, 13-14 and this season.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76096
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #63 on: May 01, 2015, 03:17:58 PM »
Seems to be the same conversation on 2 threads so i'll stick this here as well.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within 5 five years he'd still get ripped. And what he says is also true whether we like it or not. We've finished top six 16 times since the end of WW2, less than a quarter of the time. Higher than 6th just the 6 times.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within five years it would fire the whole club up, surely? What's wrong with a bit of ambition and thinking outside the box to get there.  Who knows, a bit of belief and focus could fire us up to do a Dortmund or Atletico.  The problem with making statements that suggest we are settling for average is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: we will attract sponsorship deals on a par with the Southamptons of this world when really we should be getting similar deals (at least) to the likes of Spurs.  Like I say, I appreciate we don't have a divine right to success, but neither has any other club.  Why, by settling for second best, are we making it easier for other clubs to win things?  If this is a short term vision count me in, if it's a long term strategy it makes me ask the question, "What's the point?" 

Those stats about top six finishes are interesting in that I am sure they stand up well against most clubs.  My maths might be wrong here but I think we have had nine top six finishes in the Premier League era compared to Spurs' seven - and that is including the write-offs of the past four seasons.  If we are not competing with the likes of Spurs - at the very least - I really do think we are being sold short.

Who knows what they are saying in private, they may well be aiming higher for all we know. The point is if he said we aim to be CL/title challengers in x years he'd be ripped just as much as he is for what he did say.

I hope we are aiming higher but the reality is we average 8th or 9th in the league since the PL started, our ground is the 7th biggest (9th when Spurs and West Ham move) and we are normally around the 8th or 9th best supported (currently 11th). I don't see how what he has said is selling us short when everything points to that being our place in the game, whether we like it or not.
It also doesn't mean we have to settle for it long term, but we've got to get to 7th or 9th before we can look at pushing on from there.

Online Billy Walker

  • Member
  • Posts: 2423
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #64 on: May 01, 2015, 03:21:27 PM »
Seems to be the same conversation on 2 threads so i'll stick this here as well.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within 5 five years he'd still get ripped. And what he says is also true whether we like it or not. We've finished top six 16 times since the end of WW2, less than a quarter of the time. Higher than 6th just the 6 times.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within five years it would fire the whole club up, surely? What's wrong with a bit of ambition and thinking outside the box to get there.  Who knows, a bit of belief and focus could fire us up to do a Dortmund or Atletico.  The problem with making statements that suggest we are settling for average is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: we will attract sponsorship deals on a par with the Southamptons of this world when really we should be getting similar deals (at least) to the likes of Spurs.  Like I say, I appreciate we don't have a divine right to success, but neither has any other club.  Why, by settling for second best, are we making it easier for other clubs to win things?  If this is a short term vision count me in, if it's a long term strategy it makes me ask the question, "What's the point?" 

Those stats about top six finishes are interesting in that I am sure they stand up well against most clubs.  My maths might be wrong here but I think we have had nine top six finishes in the Premier League era compared to Spurs' seven - and that is including the write-offs of the past four seasons.  If we are not competing with the likes of Spurs - at the very least - I really do think we are being sold short.

Who knows what they are saying in private, they may well be aiming higher for all we know. The point is if he said we aim to be CL/title challengers in x years he'd be ripped just as much as he is for what he did say.

I hope we are aiming higher but the reality is we average 8th or 9th in the league since the PL started, our ground is the 7th biggest (9th when Spurs and West Ham move) and we are normally around the 8th or 9th best supported (currently 11th). I don't see how what he has said is selling us short when everything points to that being our place in the game, whether we like it or not.
It also doesn't mean we have to settle for it long term, but we've got to get to 7th or 9th before we can look at pushing on from there.

Don't get me started on Spurs and West Ham's stadium expansions or I'll never stop!   

Offline not3bad

  • Member
  • Posts: 12218
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 15.06.2022
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #65 on: May 01, 2015, 04:14:55 PM »
Seems to be the same conversation on 2 threads so i'll stick this here as well.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within 5 five years he'd still get ripped. And what he says is also true whether we like it or not. We've finished top six 16 times since the end of WW2, less than a quarter of the time. Higher than 6th just the 6 times.

If he said we intend to be title challengers within five years it would fire the whole club up, surely? What's wrong with a bit of ambition and thinking outside the box to get there.  Who knows, a bit of belief and focus could fire us up to do a Dortmund or Atletico.  The problem with making statements that suggest we are settling for average is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: we will attract sponsorship deals on a par with the Southamptons of this world when really we should be getting similar deals (at least) to the likes of Spurs.  Like I say, I appreciate we don't have a divine right to success, but neither has any other club.  Why, by settling for second best, are we making it easier for other clubs to win things?  If this is a short term vision count me in, if it's a long term strategy it makes me ask the question, "What's the point?" 

Those stats about top six finishes are interesting in that I am sure they stand up well against most clubs.  My maths might be wrong here but I think we have had nine top six finishes in the Premier League era compared to Spurs' seven - and that is including the write-offs of the past four seasons.  If we are not competing with the likes of Spurs - at the very least - I really do think we are being sold short.

Who knows what they are saying in private, they may well be aiming higher for all we know. The point is if he said we aim to be CL/title challengers in x years he'd be ripped just as much as he is for what he did say.

I hope we are aiming higher but the reality is we average 8th or 9th in the league since the PL started, our ground is the 7th biggest (9th when Spurs and West Ham move) and we are normally around the 8th or 9th best supported (currently 11th). I don't see how what he has said is selling us short when everything points to that being our place in the game, whether we like it or not.
It also doesn't mean we have to settle for it long term, but we've got to get to 7th or 9th before we can look at pushing on from there.

It's all down to the terminology used.  If he'd said "I see us pushing for Europe on a regular basis" it would mean much the same thing but nobody would have complained.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #66 on: May 01, 2015, 04:25:39 PM »
Mods - I'm cutting and pasting this from the Benteke thread. You may want to delete that one.

Fox has said that a sale isn't imminent so i doubt that there can be any factual basis for saying that he came here ahead of any sale. I think he likes being the big cheese compared to what i guess he had at Arsenal. he had the say so in sacking Lambert and it may be that he's running things at Villa with Lerner happily getting updates and signing off the big decisions - such as sacking Lambert.
Modify message

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11786
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #67 on: May 01, 2015, 05:47:28 PM »
I'd say that with some of the players we have and a summer of good recruitment we can easily make the leap from relegation battles to inside the top 10 and pushing.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18200
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #68 on: May 01, 2015, 09:15:17 PM »
I suspect that Fox referred to competing outside the top 6 because, if you read the recent coverage of the Premier League's return to profitability and its link to FFP, several commentators remark that FFP will reinforce the clubs that already have a high revenue base and squads with quality in depth.
Clubs that regularly play in Europe will always be able to outspend those that don't because their higher revenue will enable them to pay more in wages.
Our short-term realistic aspiration therefore is likely to be in the 7-10 places of the League, by executing clever player-acquisition and a more fruitful academy. Sort of what Lambarse tried ...

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35763
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #69 on: May 02, 2015, 10:21:40 AM »
I've no problem with finishing 7th-9th as long as we go all out to win cups. 58 years is ridiculous.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35763
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #70 on: May 02, 2015, 10:25:40 AM »
Also, while I'm on, can someone tell me if the FA Cup Final thread is the pre-match thread? I'm superstitious about only reading them on matchdays you see.

Offline Cleybrooke

  • Member
  • Posts: 297
  • GM : 05.09.2024
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #71 on: May 02, 2015, 10:59:55 AM »
Impressed he was able to trot out the stat on viewing figures in such a way it compered us to Barca and Real and bigger than all the German clubs. Very clever.

Why? Because he is clearly using this sort of data to position Aston Villa as a global player that attracts massive audiences.

It's what you need to do if want to bring in the bigger sponsorship/kit deals and play by the rules to get around the FFP limitations.

You never know, it may even mean cheaper tickets rather than richer player agents.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #72 on: May 02, 2015, 11:10:46 AM »
Fox has been very consistent on this. At the Trust AGM he referred to us as having the best house on a terrible street whereas he wants a bungalow on the Kings Road.

He also spoke at length about how he intends to use our size and importance to gain proper partners rather than selling to the highest bidder for shirt and advertising deals.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35763
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #73 on: May 02, 2015, 11:41:37 AM »
Impressed he was able to trot out the stat on viewing figures in such a way it compered us to Barca and Real and bigger than all the German clubs. Very clever.

Why? Because he is clearly using this sort of data to position Aston Villa as a global player that attracts massive audiences.

It's what you need to do if want to bring in the bigger sponsorship/kit deals and play by the rules to get around the FFP limitations.

You never know, it may even mean cheaper tickets rather than richer player agents.

I missed this. Can somebody link to the story or relevant page on here? Ta.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Fantastic Mr Fox
« Reply #74 on: May 02, 2015, 12:17:10 PM »
Impressed he was able to trot out the stat on viewing figures in such a way it compered us to Barca and Real and bigger than all the German clubs. Very clever.

Why? Because he is clearly using this sort of data to position Aston Villa as a global player that attracts massive audiences.

It's what you need to do if want to bring in the bigger sponsorship/kit deals and play by the rules to get around the FFP limitations.

You never know, it may even mean cheaper tickets rather than richer player agents.

I missed this. Can somebody link to the story or relevant page on here? Ta.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/apr/30/aston-villa-tom-fox-chief-executive-randy-lerner-fa-cup-final

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal