collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: What Newspaper for Truth  (Read 13538 times)

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34346
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #60 on: March 09, 2015, 01:57:21 PM »
No football supporter should ever buy the Sun.
No human being should ever buy the Sun.

No human being should subscribe to sky. But most of them do .

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63356
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #61 on: March 09, 2015, 01:59:12 PM »
No football supporter should ever buy the Sun.
No human being should ever buy the Sun.

No human being should subscribe to sky. But most of them do .

They don't. Sky audience figures are still a fraction of terrestrial ones.

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34346
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #62 on: March 09, 2015, 02:00:37 PM »
The super soaraway Sun's headline was shocking. Reading all the reviews of the game I think I was at another game as all I saw was (after 5 years of misery) fans celebrating.

A return to the dark ages it was not.


Lets hope Villa ban the cnut.s

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34346
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #63 on: March 09, 2015, 02:01:59 PM »
No football supporter should ever buy the Sun.
No human being should ever buy the Sun.

No human being should subscribe to sky. But most of them do .

They don't. Sky audience figures are still a fraction of terrestrial ones.


Maybe Dave, but would be better if no one subscribed to it , especially villa fans .

Let the chavski and manure waste their money on its rubbish.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63356
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #64 on: March 09, 2015, 02:35:10 PM »
No football supporter should ever buy the Sun.
No human being should ever buy the Sun.

No human being should subscribe to sky. But most of them do .

They don't. Sky audience figures are still a fraction of terrestrial ones.


Maybe Dave, but would be better if no one subscribed to it , especially villa fans .

Let the chavski and manure waste their money on its rubbish.

I totally agree.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47646
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #65 on: March 09, 2015, 05:22:45 PM »
The Guardian again, the gist and tone of which could virtually have been lifted from these very pages.:

Quote
Pitch invasions are bad. The Fiver knows pitch invasions are bad because it spent all day yesterday and much of today listening to various people pontificating in newspapers, on TV and on the radio getting their smalls in a righteously indignant twist over two separate pitch invasions at Villa Park on Saturday evening, when some happy booze-fuelled numpties stormed the pitch to celebrate a goal and then victory for their team against local rivals West Brom. Happy football fans? We can’t be having that.

Rather than being a return to the bad old days of the 1970s and 1980s, as some more hysterical commentators have suggested, your glass half-full Fiver prefers to think of it as more of a reminder of the 1960s, a decade in which a similar pitch invasion perpetrated by similarly happy football fans at Wembley outraged public sensibilities to such an extent that it is to this day celebrated through its immortalisation in one of the most celebrated snippets of sports commentary ever heard. Happy football fans? Let’s put it on a 49-year loop.

OK, so pitch invasions aren’t ideal or indeed particularly rare (has a play-off semi-final second leg ever actually ended without one?), but compared to fans being hit by seats torn from the Villa Park away end or corner-takers being pelted by missiles flung by spectators, they’re little more than a minor inconvenience that can be fairly easily avoided.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 05:26:52 PM by Dave »

Offline ciggiesnbeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 6794
  • Location: Mass hysteria for Aston Villa. Some team from the mountains in Russia
  • GM : 23.01.2019
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #66 on: March 09, 2015, 05:38:42 PM »
The Guardian again, the gist and tone of which could virtually have been lifted from these very pages.:

Quote
Pitch invasions are bad. The Fiver knows pitch invasions are bad because it spent all day yesterday and much of today listening to various people pontificating in newspapers, on TV and on the radio getting their smalls in a righteously indignant twist over two separate pitch invasions at Villa Park on Saturday evening, when some happy booze-fuelled numpties stormed the pitch to celebrate a goal and then victory for their team against local rivals West Brom. Happy football fans? We can’t be having that.

Rather than being a return to the bad old days of the 1970s and 1980s, as some more hysterical commentators have suggested, your glass half-full Fiver prefers to think of it as more of a reminder of the 1960s, a decade in which a similar pitch invasion perpetrated by similarly happy football fans at Wembley outraged public sensibilities to such an extent that it is to this day celebrated through its immortalisation in one of the most celebrated snippets of sports commentary ever heard. Happy football fans? Let’s put it on a 49-year loop.

OK, so pitch invasions aren’t ideal or indeed particularly rare (has a play-off semi-final second leg ever actually ended without one?), but compared to fans being hit by seats torn from the Villa Park away end or corner-takers being pelted by missiles flung by spectators, they’re little more than a minor inconvenience that can be fairly easily avoided.

I see Barry Glendenning is writing the Fiver again. Good lad.

Online brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11147
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #67 on: March 09, 2015, 06:23:52 PM »
I agree with the Chelsea fan. Going onto the pitch during the game is kind of berky, because we're trying to watch, damn it, but after the game? I'm sure the groundsman can cope, and it was all in a good spirit.

Wasnt our captain bitten?

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7248
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #68 on: March 09, 2015, 07:01:22 PM »
I agree with the Chelsea fan. Going onto the pitch during the game is kind of berky, because we're trying to watch, damn it, but after the game? I'm sure the groundsman can cope, and it was all in a good spirit.

Wasnt our captain bitten?

IIRC he said he was kissed and he could feel teeth.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15661
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #69 on: March 09, 2015, 07:05:23 PM »
I agree with the Chelsea fan. Going onto the pitch during the game is kind of berky, because we're trying to watch, damn it, but after the game? I'm sure the groundsman can cope, and it was all in a good spirit.

Wasnt our captain bitten?

He clearly said it in jest right after the match finished. He burst out laughing for crying out loud.

Online dave shelley

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16029
  • Age: 76
  • Location: between a rock and a hard place
  • GM : 01.02.2026
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #70 on: March 09, 2015, 07:12:50 PM »
In one of the images I've seen of the outpouring of joy, shows Delph surrounded by ecstatic fans jumping up and down singing and, Delph himself laughing and joining in.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15661
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #71 on: March 09, 2015, 07:16:09 PM »
The Birmingham Mail tweeted something earlier of so called footage of a couple of Albion players being abused and hit after the match. Turns out a fan brushed past the one player and the other player was called a "f#ckin twat".
Honestly it's pathetic.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47646
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #72 on: March 09, 2015, 07:38:35 PM »
The BBC live feed of tonight's match

Quote
Mr Oizo was at number one with his annoying, bass-heavy 'Flat Beat', the minimum wage was introduced at £3.60 an hour for workers over 21, and these sides served up one of the great FA Cup games - perhaps one of the best games I've ever seen - in the semi-final replay at Villa Park.

Younger readers may not have ever seen the classic - so fill your boots here! It was a brilliant, brilliant match.


For some reason they don't think that this was "a return to the Dark Ages", even though they accompany it with a photograph of the barbarian hordes surrounding David Beckham.

Edited for stupid malapropism
« Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 10:07:28 PM by Dave »

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 3633
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #73 on: March 09, 2015, 10:03:41 PM »
Hordes, please.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47646
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: What Newspaper for Truth
« Reply #74 on: March 09, 2015, 10:07:46 PM »
Urgh, you're quite right of course.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal