Quote from: Gregorys Boy on February 21, 2015, 05:44:36 PMQuote from: Holte L2 on February 21, 2015, 05:41:27 PMSome radical changes needed now.Next week I'd go as follows.Given in for GuzanOkore in for VlaarCleverley in for SanchezWeimann in for GabbyBacuna for Gil.Fuck me this is desperate. Only Okore for Vlaar I would consider from those.Really? Sanchez, and Gil were appalling. Bacuna looked lively last week and looked capable of creating chances.
Quote from: Holte L2 on February 21, 2015, 05:41:27 PMSome radical changes needed now.Next week I'd go as follows.Given in for GuzanOkore in for VlaarCleverley in for SanchezWeimann in for GabbyBacuna for Gil.Fuck me this is desperate. Only Okore for Vlaar I would consider from those.
Some radical changes needed now.Next week I'd go as follows.Given in for GuzanOkore in for VlaarCleverley in for SanchezWeimann in for GabbyBacuna for Gil.Fuck me this is desperate.
I don't know how many corners we had, but half of them didn't get above waist high. Terrible technique. Players have no real fight or passion. What was Vlaar thinking? A right cock-up!
Quote from: Villafirst on February 21, 2015, 06:15:15 PMI don't know how many corners we had, but half of them didn't get above waist high. Terrible technique. Players have no real fight or passion. What was Vlaar thinking? A right cock-up!Vlaar has been rubbish for us. Permanently crocked or making mistakes when in the team. I trust that's the last we've seen of him after today. Okore and Clark for the rest of the season please.
Actually Hilts, my post really was about the long balls, which can happen in any formation. You appear to be having a different conversation to the one I'm having. I was talking about long balls, not formations, but apparently you're determined to change the subject while acting like you're not.It's no good just saying unbelievably obvious platitudes 'Sherwood has to go with the method he most believes in and which he thinks will get us the most points' (well, gee, thanks professor) - what if he's wrong? I think he got it wrong today, in a few ways, most of which aren't the formation. It's not about 'aesthetic nirvana' (again, I like the implied ad hominem - it's beneath you, Hilts, it really is) it's about getting the football wrong on the pitch. Debate those points with me, if you want. Or we can just have a general discussion about 4-4-2, which I do actually think can work in some situations based on what I've seen. Not that that fits your straw man image of me and my views, I'm sure.
Guzan used to have an excellent reputation for saving penalties. But I assume that's wholly based on Sunderland in the League Cup?