Quote from: tomd2103 on April 21, 2015, 08:12:10 PMQuote from: PaulWinch again on April 21, 2015, 05:44:20 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on April 21, 2015, 04:46:15 PMStokes is not yet a good enough bowler to be the 4th bowler. Especially considering Ali is still very much in the developing stage as a spinner.There looks to be a great amount of pressure on Anderson and Broad to take the baulk of the wickets hereDisagree I don't think you can class Ali as developing when he's got 20 wickets at 28 and against India. He's much better than developing. Stokes is fine as 4th seamer, but the second and third sElmer need to do their job.I know you rate him very highly, but that was done mostly in one series Paul. Let's wait to see how his stats look after a number of series (similar figures in the Ashes would be nice) before making judgments. In his favour he had 1 series where he did ok but didn't have the threat so he went away and worked on it before coming back faster and far more dangerous. That ability to learn and adapt is why I personally think he's a definite front line spinner, that intelligence is a key requirement. Very unlucky not to get the wicket there, lovely delivery and well worth a review.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on April 21, 2015, 05:44:20 PMQuote from: taylorsworkrate on April 21, 2015, 04:46:15 PMStokes is not yet a good enough bowler to be the 4th bowler. Especially considering Ali is still very much in the developing stage as a spinner.There looks to be a great amount of pressure on Anderson and Broad to take the baulk of the wickets hereDisagree I don't think you can class Ali as developing when he's got 20 wickets at 28 and against India. He's much better than developing. Stokes is fine as 4th seamer, but the second and third sElmer need to do their job.I know you rate him very highly, but that was done mostly in one series Paul. Let's wait to see how his stats look after a number of series (similar figures in the Ashes would be nice) before making judgments.
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on April 21, 2015, 04:46:15 PMStokes is not yet a good enough bowler to be the 4th bowler. Especially considering Ali is still very much in the developing stage as a spinner.There looks to be a great amount of pressure on Anderson and Broad to take the baulk of the wickets hereDisagree I don't think you can class Ali as developing when he's got 20 wickets at 28 and against India. He's much better than developing. Stokes is fine as 4th seamer, but the second and third sElmer need to do their job.
Stokes is not yet a good enough bowler to be the 4th bowler. Especially considering Ali is still very much in the developing stage as a spinner.There looks to be a great amount of pressure on Anderson and Broad to take the baulk of the wickets here
I get the sense that Jordan is really close to being a very good bowler.
I feel sorry for Tredwell .No way did he deserve to be dropped after the first test. England always seem to have a fall guy and i think Tredwell is the current one.
Quote from: peter w on April 21, 2015, 06:18:02 PMI wouldn't go as far to say he's one of the best bowlers of all time. One of the best English bowlers yes, but not across the board.14th most test wickets ever, I think it's justified, he'll probably end up 12th by the end of this season (5 behind ntini and 20 behind Ambrose, he's also 11 behind Steyn but I'd guess Steyn will get a few himself).
I wouldn't go as far to say he's one of the best bowlers of all time. One of the best English bowlers yes, but not across the board.