collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 05:57:55 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Gareth
[Today at 05:57:11 PM]


Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by Louzie0
[Today at 05:50:55 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Unai Emery by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:31:41 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by waynejames
[Today at 04:11:56 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:08:06 PM]


The Barton's Arms by waynejames
[Today at 04:06:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 05:57:55 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Gareth
[Today at 05:57:11 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by Louzie0
[Today at 05:50:55 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker (sold to Real Oviedo) by London Villan
[Today at 05:47:49 PM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 05:44:02 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 05:31:41 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Toronto Villa
[Today at 05:26:47 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by eamonn
[Today at 05:26:27 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 500999 times)

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5025 on: July 17, 2016, 03:01:20 PM »
Terrible Moeen.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5026 on: July 17, 2016, 03:01:59 PM »
Fucking hell, that was moronic.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5027 on: July 17, 2016, 03:02:10 PM »
What a gutless surrender this has turned into.

Offline KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14114
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5028 on: July 17, 2016, 03:02:25 PM »
They'll wrap this up this afternoon.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5029 on: July 17, 2016, 03:05:33 PM »
Is it too much to ask that Pakistan actually have to try to take their wickets?

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5030 on: July 17, 2016, 03:10:53 PM »
England's cricket since Bayliss has taken over has been really impressive, but I think this game has illustrated our problem. We've got obsessed with over aggression. This situation requires a sensible approach, but we can out frenetically and just slashing at it. I think the whole mentality of the squad needs to be more flexible. All these players can play, but they need to engage their brains. Moeen, Root and Hales were all just stupid. There's no excuse for Root and Moeen they're both experienced players now. The ability to understand the game situation needs to be the lesson from this game.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5031 on: July 17, 2016, 03:17:11 PM »
Root in particular has played two ridiculous shots. It's arguable that the one in the 1st innings was worse, as at 118 for 1 we were in complete control.

I don't think Pakistan have bowled well in either innings really. We've made it so easy for them.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5032 on: July 17, 2016, 03:43:05 PM »
I think Root should be dropped and returned to Yorkshire for the rest of the season. And Bairstow. Both of them to be replaced by Middlesex players.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5033 on: July 17, 2016, 04:57:46 PM »
What we're seeing now is why they were rushing things a little earlier, there was always going to be a spell like this where we struggled to score against the reverse swing which allows huge amounts of pressure at the other end.  We now need to hang on and get to the end of the day and hope they take the new ball then push from there.  It's a big ask to win this with the wickets we've lost but I can understand why they thought it was worth the risk.

The truth is we were 50 runs light in our first innings and then we let 6,7 and 8 score too many for them yesterday afternoon when we had them on the ropes.  fix those 2 and we'd be looking at another 30-40 runs here rather than 110.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5034 on: July 17, 2016, 05:17:43 PM »
That's a shocker of a decision on the field, that's a pretty massive edge.  If we'd been out of reviews we'd feel utterly robbed right now.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5035 on: July 17, 2016, 05:37:53 PM »
Poor from Bairstow, silly mistake after a fantastic innings.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5036 on: July 17, 2016, 05:40:30 PM »
Unlucky Bairstow, but at least he showed the application.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5037 on: July 17, 2016, 05:42:01 PM »
This is nearly done.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55121
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5038 on: July 17, 2016, 05:45:12 PM »
I think Broad is completely done as a batsman against anyone who can bowl pace well.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37282
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #5039 on: July 17, 2016, 05:45:42 PM »
Needed Broad to stick around a bit but this was lost in the first innings for me, there's a good reason why this would've been the 2nd best chase ever at Lords.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal