It's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.
Quote from: Dave Cooper please on June 12, 2016, 11:33:11 PMIt's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.Obviously time will tell, but with the weather about, the difficulty in taking wickets and the fact that only twice in the last 30 years has a side scored more than 310 in the 4th innings indicates to me that it was a return to Straussian caution.
Quote from: Woofles The Wonder Dog on June 13, 2016, 09:00:57 AMQuote from: Dave Cooper please on June 12, 2016, 11:33:11 PMIt's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.Obviously time will tell, but with the weather about, the difficulty in taking wickets and the fact that only twice in the last 30 years has a side scored more than 310 in the 4th innings indicates to me that it was a return to Straussian caution. I missed out "at Lords", which was particularly relevant! Though not as relevant as the shitty weather. Still think the declaration was over cautious.Actually it's 14 times see here and 8 of those have come since 2000, which shows that with the higher run rates in modern Test cricket it will become more common to see 300+ run chases.
I'd like to see Tymal Mills get involved with ODIs, his back should hold up for 10 overs.