collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Cricket Thread 2016  (Read 425075 times)

Offline Woofles The Wonder Dog

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11961
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4770 on: June 13, 2016, 09:00:57 AM »
It's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.

Obviously time will tell, but with the weather about, the difficulty in taking wickets and the fact that only twice in the last 30 years has a side scored more than 310 in the 4th innings indicates to me that it was a return to Straussian caution.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4771 on: June 13, 2016, 10:40:14 PM »
It's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.

Obviously time will tell, but with the weather about, the difficulty in taking wickets and the fact that only twice in the last 30 years has a side scored more than 310 in the 4th innings indicates to me that it was a return to Straussian caution.

Actually it's 14 times see here and 8 of those have come since 2000, which shows that with the higher run rates in modern Test cricket it will become more common to see 300+ run chases.

Offline Woofles The Wonder Dog

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11961
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4772 on: June 13, 2016, 10:53:08 PM »
It's a balancing act. While Sri Lanka are highly unlikely to get to the target, 345 in 110 overs (there were 12 overs left in the day and 98 tomorrow because of the rain) is certainly not impossible. Much less and Sri Lanka could have been 60-0 at close needing only 250 or so to win in a day.

Obviously time will tell, but with the weather about, the difficulty in taking wickets and the fact that only twice in the last 30 years has a side scored more than 310 in the 4th innings indicates to me that it was a return to Straussian caution.


I missed out "at Lords", which was particularly relevant! Though not as relevant as the shitty weather. Still think the declaration was over cautious.
Actually it's 14 times see here and 8 of those have come since 2000, which shows that with the higher run rates in modern Test cricket it will become more common to see 300+ run chases.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4773 on: June 13, 2016, 11:56:55 PM »
Should a captain make a decision that important basing it on the weather forecast? I think he has to plan on there being a full 90 (or 98 in this case) overs played and 310 in 98 overs is gettable especially on a pitch that was still playing reasonably well.

 We are going to see more and more successful 300+ run chases, it's the way the game is going.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4774 on: June 14, 2016, 12:29:55 AM »
But they'd already won the series. Who cares? Live a little.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4775 on: June 14, 2016, 02:35:05 AM »
No way, grind them into the ground.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4776 on: June 14, 2016, 02:03:50 PM »
Nah. Do what you can to win. It's a spectator sport.

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13577
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4777 on: June 14, 2016, 02:20:19 PM »
Our record in the final test of a series where we're winning is poor. It's the complete opposite to our record in the final test of a losing series where we always seemed to win against the Aussies when the Ashes had gone again.

We should press for victory every time.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4778 on: June 21, 2016, 01:38:36 PM »
First ODI.

1 Jason Roy, 2 Alex Hales, 3 Joe Root, 4 Eoin Morgan (capt), 5 Jos Buttler (wk), 6 Jonny Bairstow, 7 Moeen Ali, 8 Chris Woakes, 9 Adil Rashid, 10 David Willey, 11 Liam Plunkett

No Finn or Jordan, two spinners

England won toss and chose to bowl.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49568
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4779 on: June 21, 2016, 01:48:14 PM »
I'd like to see Tymal Mills get involved with ODIs, his back should hold up for 10 overs.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4780 on: June 21, 2016, 02:41:31 PM »
SL rattling along but losing wickets.
56-3 sfater 8.4 overs - two for Willey and one for Woakes.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4781 on: June 21, 2016, 04:05:47 PM »
Plunkett is throwing down an over full of utter filth here.

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 14421
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4782 on: June 21, 2016, 04:06:15 PM »
I'd like to see Tymal Mills get involved with ODIs, his back should hold up for 10 overs.

Saw him in a T20 a few weeks ago and he was impressive and very quick (think he was clocked at over 90 mph).  In the interview after the game, he said that sadly 4 overs is all he can really manage, although he hoped to play in a 50 over game at some point.  Real shame, as we don't produce genuine quick bowlers very often if at all.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33468
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4783 on: June 21, 2016, 04:14:37 PM »
Yet another Woakes wicket with the first ball of a spell, that's becoming a fantastic habit this summer.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49568
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Cricket Thread 2016
« Reply #4784 on: June 21, 2016, 06:21:48 PM »
That's a shocking start to the reply compounded by the worst review ever!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal