collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Amadou Onana by Paul.S
[Today at 08:12:09 PM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Paul.S
[Today at 08:09:50 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:02:34 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:51:36 PM]


Pau Torres by Villafirst
[Today at 07:49:55 PM]


Ollie Watkins by PaulWinch again
[Today at 07:45:51 PM]


Lucas Digne by brontebilly
[Today at 07:45:43 PM]


Unai Emery by London Villan
[Today at 07:06:14 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Delph's dismissal  (Read 21079 times)

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59507
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Delph's dismissal
« on: December 28, 2014, 06:46:26 PM »


Yellow.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74649
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2014, 06:48:07 PM »
Sorry, but i think that's a red.

Even if you take a more lenient view of it and don't see it as a red, there's an argument that that's the sort of tackle which gets perceived as a red these days.

It was a shit tackle and he didn't chop him down at the ankle, he stood on his foot, but it was late and dangerous.

Online aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11765
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2014, 06:49:37 PM »
That's a red. Stamp down the ankle and on to the foot.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26401
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2014, 06:51:03 PM »
Its red for me, it was a lunge and was after the ball had been played. No excuse.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76069
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2014, 06:51:18 PM »
I honestly think it should have been a yellow. But can also see why  it was given as a red and no way will it be rescinded.

And he deserved a red just for the fucking stupidity of the challenge anyway. Benteke, Richardson, Delph, all have cost us with sheer fucking fuckwittery.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2014, 06:51:45 PM »
Red. Dumb tackle, in hard, no ball contact and caught vulnerable part of player.

Online FranzBiberkopf

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2014, 06:53:01 PM »
Red.

Glaring reason why he'll end up at the Spurs/Evertons/Liverpools of this world rather than any higher.

Offline Ron Manager

  • Member
  • Posts: 5710
  • Location: Staffordshire
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2014, 06:53:57 PM »
Red. Pure stupidity.

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2014, 06:55:02 PM »
Its red for me, it was a lunge and was after the ball had been played. No excuse.

Behave. He got there a fraction of a second after the ball had gone.

It was a genuine attempt to play the ball and he just missed it. 9 times out of 10 that would be a yellow.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47676
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2014, 06:55:27 PM »
I honestly think it should have been a yellow. But can also see why  it was given as a red and no way will it be rescinded.

And he deserved a red just for the fucking stupidity of the challenge anyway. Benteke, Richardson, Delph, all have cost us with sheer fucking fuckwittery.
Couldn't have put it better myself, on all counts.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2014, 06:57:03 PM »
Another vote for red here. Nine times out of ten a player will go for a challenge like that.

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59507
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2014, 06:57:42 PM »
At the time I was convinced it should have been yellow.

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5766
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2014, 07:01:10 PM »
Yellow at most, for me.
Seen a lot worse go unpunished.

Mind you, given some of the Villa reds this season he should be banned for life!!

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26401
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2014, 07:01:37 PM »
If it should have been a yellow it will get rescinded.

It wont.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58602
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Delph's dismissal
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2014, 07:02:11 PM »
if someone can put up the Konchesky red then you'll see they are both the same. Konchesky got nothing for his in the end but it should have been yellow. In my opinion Delph's challenge is no different in that it is equally wreckless, and unlike Konchesky he didn't follow up on the victim by taunting him.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal