TBAR tends to be the place where posters who abuse our messaging system end up.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2015, 12:29:13 AMTBAR tends to be the place where posters who abuse our messaging system end up.How is it that your clique all agree with each other on most subjects? Looking back through a few threads, it seems you have all started spouting stuff that you were all dead against a couple of years ago.
Scott Sinclair could be on his way to Aston Villa as Paul Lambert eyes loan move for forgotten Manchester City wingerAston Villa, QPR and Crystal Palace all interested in Man City wingerOut-of-favour Sinclair would prefer a loan move to Aston Villa By SIMON JONES FOR MAILONLINEPUBLISHED: 00:33, 4 January 2015 | UPDATED: 00:33, 4 January 2015Aston Villa have made a move to sign Manchester City misfit Scott Sinclair on loan.The 25-year-old has interest from QPR, Crystal Palace and Norwich but is leaning towards a move to Villa Park.Sinclair has made four appearances this season, each as a late substitute, and is eager to get his career back on track.He had an ill-fated loan spell with West Bromwich Albion last season but hopes to have better fortune with Paul Lambert.
You got my PM to come to the thread then chaps.
Daily HeilQuoteScott Sinclair could be on his way to Aston Villa as Paul Lambert eyes loan move for forgotten Manchester City wingerAston Villa, QPR and Crystal Palace all interested in Man City wingerOut-of-favour Sinclair would prefer a loan move to Aston Villa By SIMON JONES FOR MAILONLINEPUBLISHED: 00:33, 4 January 2015 | UPDATED: 00:33, 4 January 2015Aston Villa have made a move to sign Manchester City misfit Scott Sinclair on loan.The 25-year-old has interest from QPR, Crystal Palace and Norwich but is leaning towards a move to Villa Park.Sinclair has made four appearances this season, each as a late substitute, and is eager to get his career back on track.He had an ill-fated loan spell with West Bromwich Albion last season but hopes to have better fortune with Paul Lambert.
Be fair people, panic buying means over spending on players. Yes there is a dire need for a creative player but surely we'd not condone him recklessly throwing cash at any player who falls under the 'creative' category? If you do, then it would be unfair to later trash the player or Lambert if the player does not meet expectations. That's logical isn't it?