When he calls anybody 'fucking divs' then he'll be told to stop it. He has a ridiculous argument, but one that is hardly undermined by people throwing around insults that a ten-year old would find immature.
I offer 'contemptible buffons' in it's place.
Quote from: LeeB on November 16, 2014, 08:04:06 PMI offer 'contemptible buffons' in it's place.Good keeper. Did MON attempt to sign him too ?
We have a party line? Ace! Anyone for more beer?
Quote from: go on the dog on November 16, 2014, 07:00:29 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on November 16, 2014, 06:54:50 PMThe fact we only had £7m to spend this summer despite an income of nigh on £100m is down to the legacy MON left us. He bankrupted Celtic tooI think we have now gone from the sublime to the ridulousAnd Leicester if I remember had money troubles when he leftHe's like a Harry Redknapp with glasses.
Quote from: silhillvilla on November 16, 2014, 06:54:50 PMThe fact we only had £7m to spend this summer despite an income of nigh on £100m is down to the legacy MON left us. He bankrupted Celtic tooI think we have now gone from the sublime to the ridulousAnd Leicester if I remember had money troubles when he left
The fact we only had £7m to spend this summer despite an income of nigh on £100m is down to the legacy MON left us. He bankrupted Celtic too
Quote from: Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air on November 16, 2014, 07:45:56 PMQuote from: go on the dog on November 16, 2014, 07:00:29 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on November 16, 2014, 06:54:50 PMThe fact we only had £7m to spend this summer despite an income of nigh on £100m is down to the legacy MON left us. He bankrupted Celtic tooI think we have now gone from the sublime to the ridulousAnd Leicester if I remember had money troubles when he leftHe's like a Harry Redknapp with glasses.I'm wondering whether he was behind the global banking crisis aswell
Quote from: supertom on November 16, 2014, 02:28:33 PMQuote from: Monty on November 16, 2014, 02:01:18 PM'Thoroughly decent'? And, again, 'held in high regard' - by whom? By Robbie Savage and Steve Claridge?He is remarkable in one way. There aren't many managers who are so good at one thing and so bad at another. MON is, or at least was, quite amazing at motivating players, creating a club mentality or even a siege mentality, and inspiring loyalty in players and individual performances of a level higher than they often should be. However, he was a good candidate, even while with us, for the title of League's Least Progressive Tactician, along with training methods, player diets, squad use etc. He would have been a brilliant manager in the 1970s, but he was an inadequate one in the 2000s.In regards to our training and fitness I think O Neills injury records compared to each of our managers since speaks volumes. Also whilst his rotating policies should have been better. We kept a high tempo for 90 minutes far better under O Neill than the last couple of managers. I think there's some fallacy that O Neill had this lazy bunch of booze guzzling, fag smoking wasters at his disposal who couldn't last the season. I don't care how fit you are if you don't rotate your squad a bit, or make substitutions, even the fittest squad would struggle by March-April as we annually did. But in my view, on the seasons on a whole under O Neill our squad looked in much better nick than it does now. Players didn't drop like flies. And they always gave 110%Compare Gabby now to back then. Fitness, attitude but mostly work-rate. It's like a different player. If I had a squad of players I wanted fit for Prem competition and to be looked after. I'd be asking O Neill to do it long before I'd ask Houllier, Lambert, or TSM1.He really should've learnt from 08/09 in regards squad rotation.I still think of the two seasons 09/10 was our best opportunity to finish top 4 (clearly it had to be with the money Man. City were spending) and yet in March 2010 we had results like Villa 2 Wolves 2, Villa 1 Sunderland 1 and Chelsea 7 Villa 1 which knackered our GD compared to Spurs anfd Man., City.We didn't change the team enough. It wasn't impossible to win with below par 11s, christ early on in the season we won at Anfield with Shorey and Beye as our full backs.That reminds me, Habib fecking Beye. What was the point of signing him when Luke Young was already at the club and in the end he just decided to play Cuellar at RB for the whole season, what a waste of a signing.He did some good things for the club I'm not going to deny, 6th was about par for what we were spending but we did mess up some great opportunites.
Quote from: Monty on November 16, 2014, 02:01:18 PM'Thoroughly decent'? And, again, 'held in high regard' - by whom? By Robbie Savage and Steve Claridge?He is remarkable in one way. There aren't many managers who are so good at one thing and so bad at another. MON is, or at least was, quite amazing at motivating players, creating a club mentality or even a siege mentality, and inspiring loyalty in players and individual performances of a level higher than they often should be. However, he was a good candidate, even while with us, for the title of League's Least Progressive Tactician, along with training methods, player diets, squad use etc. He would have been a brilliant manager in the 1970s, but he was an inadequate one in the 2000s.In regards to our training and fitness I think O Neills injury records compared to each of our managers since speaks volumes. Also whilst his rotating policies should have been better. We kept a high tempo for 90 minutes far better under O Neill than the last couple of managers. I think there's some fallacy that O Neill had this lazy bunch of booze guzzling, fag smoking wasters at his disposal who couldn't last the season. I don't care how fit you are if you don't rotate your squad a bit, or make substitutions, even the fittest squad would struggle by March-April as we annually did. But in my view, on the seasons on a whole under O Neill our squad looked in much better nick than it does now. Players didn't drop like flies. And they always gave 110%Compare Gabby now to back then. Fitness, attitude but mostly work-rate. It's like a different player. If I had a squad of players I wanted fit for Prem competition and to be looked after. I'd be asking O Neill to do it long before I'd ask Houllier, Lambert, or TSM1.
'Thoroughly decent'? And, again, 'held in high regard' - by whom? By Robbie Savage and Steve Claridge?He is remarkable in one way. There aren't many managers who are so good at one thing and so bad at another. MON is, or at least was, quite amazing at motivating players, creating a club mentality or even a siege mentality, and inspiring loyalty in players and individual performances of a level higher than they often should be. However, he was a good candidate, even while with us, for the title of League's Least Progressive Tactician, along with training methods, player diets, squad use etc. He would have been a brilliant manager in the 1970s, but he was an inadequate one in the 2000s.
Quote from: passport1 on November 16, 2014, 08:29:40 PMQuote from: Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air on November 16, 2014, 07:45:56 PMQuote from: go on the dog on November 16, 2014, 07:00:29 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on November 16, 2014, 06:54:50 PMThe fact we only had £7m to spend this summer despite an income of nigh on £100m is down to the legacy MON left us. He bankrupted Celtic tooI think we have now gone from the sublime to the ridulousAnd Leicester if I remember had money troubles when he leftHe's like a Harry Redknapp with glasses.I'm wondering whether he was behind the global banking crisis aswell
Hang on a minute, what happened to the clique? Is it a party line now?
Quote from: Dave on November 16, 2014, 07:56:39 PMWhen he calls anybody 'fucking divs' then he'll be told to stop it. He has a ridiculous argument, but one that is hardly undermined by people throwing around insults that a ten-year old would find immature. I apologise for the choice of insult. I offer 'contemptible buffons' in it's place.I trust this matter is now closed.
Quote from: Chris Jameson on November 16, 2014, 09:05:21 PMHang on a minute, what happened to the clique? Is it a party line now?Yes, were you not at the covert planning meeting on Thursday?