A lot of people are also missing the brilliance of the first goal as well. Enough precision and pace from 20 yards to beat a top keeper like Neuer at his near post.
The reason I rate Messi above Ronaldo is that Ronaldo should be a better player. He's got the pace and physique to score so many kinds of goals. He's great in the air and can and does use that to score, he can out-run people to score, bulldoze past people to score, and use skill to score. All Messi has got is unbelievable skill, and yet I think he's scored more. I'm willing to bet he's well ahead on assists.
Quote from: Percy McCarthy on May 08, 2015, 07:29:23 PMThe reason I rate Messi above Ronaldo is that Ronaldo should be a better player. He's got the pace and physique to score so many kinds of goals. He's great in the air and can and does use that to score, he can out-run people to score, bulldoze past people to score, and use skill to score. All Messi has got is unbelievable skill, and yet I think he's scored more. I'm willing to bet he's well ahead on assists.I think it's almost impossible to separate them. The unbelievable skill of Messi versus the pace and power and still a huge amount of skill from Ronaldo. If either of them scored any more goals the universe would probably implode or something. I would expect you're right about the assists, but then Ronaldo has done it in the Premier League. The one thing neither can really claim is that they've carried their country to glory like Pele or Maradona.
Only Maradona can really claim to have carried his country to glory. Brazil would've won the 1958 World Cup without him, as they proved in 1962 when they won it again with virtually the same team while Edson was injured. The 1970 team in considered, arguably, the greatest national team ever so, again, I reckon they'd have won it without him.I'm struggling to think of too many Argentinian players in the 1986 competition other than Diego. He basically won it on his own.