collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Jacob Ramsey by nigel
[Today at 07:48:02 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by ChicagoLion
[Today at 07:26:03 AM]


Evann Guessand (Signed) by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 06:51:02 AM]


Pre season 2025 by sid1964
[Today at 05:49:07 AM]


The nearlywases - Bobby Campbell by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:44:22 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 12:43:53 AM]


23 April 1975 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:42:32 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Tuscans
[Today at 12:09:14 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Philippe Senderos  (Read 159952 times)

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #900 on: January 15, 2015, 10:09:26 PM »
We seem to have become the Bermuda Triangle of football.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #901 on: January 15, 2015, 10:10:20 PM »
He's been a smart signing. Compare and contrast if you will to say a £4m Zat Knight.
I bet you that when Senderos eventually leaves us we won't make as much profit on him as we did with Knight.

Edit: In fact, after Milner, Young and Downing would Knight have been O'Neill's most profitable (as in selling him for more than we paid) signing?

If so, that's pretty horrendous.

He probably was.  Hard to believe that people weren't queuing up to pay more than £8m for NRC, Warnock and Curtis Davies, but that's the cruel mistress that we call football.

Offline Matt Collins

  • Member
  • Posts: 10884
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #902 on: January 15, 2015, 11:17:17 PM »
Didn't we well knight for exactly what we paid for him?

Offline Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47553
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #903 on: January 16, 2015, 09:49:11 AM »
Didn't we well knight for exactly what we paid for him?
It was reported as £3.5m to Fulham and £4.5m from Bolton.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74495
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #904 on: January 16, 2015, 09:50:59 AM »
He's been a smart signing. Compare and contrast if you will to say a £4m Zat Knight.
I bet you that when Senderos eventually leaves us we won't make as much profit on him as we did with Knight.

Edit: In fact, after Milner, Young and Downing would Knight have been O'Neill's most profitable (as in selling him for more than we paid) signing?

If so, that's pretty horrendous.

Thinking about it, I can barely remember us selling anyone else under MON, other than those four.

Which was a large part of the problem, obviously.

Offline Villafirst

  • Member
  • Posts: 7344
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #905 on: February 17, 2015, 06:50:04 PM »
Back in training today. VT have a picture of him at Bodymoor. Good news, we need every single experienced player in the run-in.

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11069
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #906 on: February 17, 2015, 06:59:21 PM »
He's been a smart signing. Compare and contrast if you will to say a £4m Zat Knight.
I bet you that when Senderos eventually leaves us we won't make as much profit on him as we did with Knight.

Edit: In fact, after Milner, Young and Downing would Knight have been O'Neill's most profitable (as in selling him for more than we paid) signing?

If so, that's pretty horrendous.

Thinking about it, I can barely remember us selling anyone else under MON, other than those four.

Which was a large part of the problem, obviously.

He sold off the homegrown crew - Cahill, Davis, Moore, Ridgewell, Whittingham, Barry, Gardner

We might have made some money on Maloney too, think we got him on a Bosman

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75752
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #907 on: February 17, 2015, 07:04:23 PM »
We paid for Maloney in January rather than wait until the summer when he'd have been free.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43236
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #908 on: February 17, 2015, 08:56:04 PM »
Back in training today. VT have a picture of him at Bodymoor. Good news, we need every single experienced player in the run-in.

Can't quite believe he's been injurerd this long but yes good to have him back as he was suprisingly solid at the start of the season  alongside Vlaar and given how well Okore and Clark have done we're very strong at CB which we will need to continue to be with Sherwood's offensive tactics in the run in.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32873
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #909 on: February 17, 2015, 09:13:19 PM »
We paid for Maloney in January rather than wait until the summer when he'd have been free.

What a shrewd piece of business that wasn't.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35602
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #910 on: February 17, 2015, 09:17:19 PM »
We paid for Maloney in January rather than wait until the summer when he'd have been free.

What a shrewd piece of business that wasn't.

We sold him back for double.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74495
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #911 on: February 18, 2015, 12:08:51 AM »
We paid for Maloney in January rather than wait until the summer when he'd have been free.

What a shrewd piece of business that wasn't.

We sold him back for double.

Where i used to sit in the Upper Trinity, behind us was a row of six or seven blokes who were continually negative - loudly - during matches, but very funny with it. Stuff like, we'd kick off, and on 30 seconds, one of them would shout "come on, Villa, they're all over you!". That sort of thing, enjoyable football, errr, bants.

I remember the very first time Maloney played for us, his first touch pretty much, the ball came to him and he managed to slip or somehow fall over, and one of the blokes behind shouted "what's the matter, the ball too fucking big for you?".

It struck me as funny at the time, but following that, every single time Maloney played for us, and every single time in those appearances he touched the ball, I heard this bloke's loud voice and strong yam yam accent screaming "BALL TOO BIG FOR YOU?"

I liked Maloney, but I was glad when he left.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #912 on: February 18, 2015, 12:14:38 AM »
I knew a bloke who used to shout "RIMMER"! whenever the ball was in our half. I was never sure whether he was a big fan of the back pass or if he wanted our Jimmy to stop being lazy and get stuck in as a kind of rush goalie.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63318
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #913 on: February 18, 2015, 12:22:33 AM »
I knew a bloke who used to shout "RIMMER"! whenever the ball was in our half. I was never sure whether he was a big fan of the back pass or if he wanted our Jimmy to stop being lazy and get stuck in as a kind of rush goalie.

There's an alternative, but I'm not going to say it.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Philippe Senderos
« Reply #914 on: February 18, 2015, 12:23:50 AM »
I knew a bloke who used to shout "RIMMER"! whenever the ball was in our half. I was never sure whether he was a big fan of the back pass or if he wanted our Jimmy to stop being lazy and get stuck in as a kind of rush goalie.

There's an alternative, but I'm not going to say it.

I know. I nearly posted it.

It involved a back pass(age) pun.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal