collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Albrighton Going to Leicester  (Read 94793 times)

Offline LTA

  • Member
  • Posts: 1181
  • Age: 42
  • Location: Stourbridge
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #285 on: May 23, 2014, 06:55:00 PM »
There's been a common trend under Houllier, McLeish and Lambert.  1 or 2 rare bright spots mixed with large dollop of craps.

As far as I'm concerned, everyone involved with the 1st team since August 2010 has blood on its hands and owes us a collective apology for the shambolic way club has been run.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28102
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #286 on: May 23, 2014, 07:02:38 PM »
Whilst on the Houllier-era (which clearly divides opinions) the one that really baffled me was Michael Bradley. I had really high hopes when he came-in but I don;t think I can recall a VIall player being moved-on without being given a decent chance in the manner that he was.

Paul Mortimer


Michael Boulding.


« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 07:04:20 PM by kippaxvilla2 »

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28102
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #287 on: May 23, 2014, 07:11:35 PM »
« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 07:18:58 PM by kippaxvilla2 »

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37294
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #288 on: May 23, 2014, 07:12:26 PM »
They don't owe us anything, the entitlement that suggests is just silly.  We've had a bad time of things for a number of reasons but I don't think it's fair to suggest that many people who've been at the club in that time haven't been trying to do more.  If you want apologies look at the likes of Dunne/Collins/Warnock who were, by all reports, a poison in the dressing room for Houllier, or look at Stephen Ireland who regularly played like he'd rather be anywhere but playing football for Aston Villa.

I don't want apologies, I want them to do better.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58608
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #289 on: May 23, 2014, 07:42:56 PM »
They don't owe us anything, the entitlement that suggests is just silly.  We've had a bad time of things for a number of reasons but I don't think it's fair to suggest that many people who've been at the club in that time haven't been trying to do more.  If you want apologies look at the likes of Dunne/Collins/Warnock who were, by all reports, a poison in the dressing room for Houllier, or look at Stephen Ireland who regularly played like he'd rather be anywhere but playing football for Aston Villa.

I don't want apologies, I want them to do better.

precisely. This whole apology thing, the Moscow dinner nonsense, not for me. Football is one part of my life where I just accept I will routinely take a kick in the nuts and then line up with everyone else for the next one.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #290 on: May 23, 2014, 08:00:24 PM »
The Moscow dinner wasn't even an apology. MON would not stoop so low as to say sorry to us.
Just going back to TSM, he must have been averaging a much higher amount before the Wigan away game.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #291 on: May 23, 2014, 08:18:06 PM »
It's 1 point per game.

Even if you take west ham as the last game of his reign (which is nonsense in my opinion), he was in charge for 28 games, garnering 33 points, which is 1.18 points per game.
Just checked the records. Eck had an average of 1.12 ppg before he lost bent at Wigan .
So a difference of 0.06ppg between the two. So in effect no difference .

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #292 on: May 23, 2014, 08:57:02 PM »
Hang on. You are also making that judgement on Houllier's full tenure. You can't do with Bent for one and not the other.

Online Ger Regan

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 10382
  • Location: Dublin / Galway
  • GM : 25.11.2023
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #293 on: May 23, 2014, 09:17:02 PM »
It's 1 point per game.

Even if you take west ham as the last game of his reign (which is nonsense in my opinion), he was in charge for 28 games, garnering 33 points, which is 1.18 points per game.
Just checked the records. Eck had an average of 1.12 ppg before he lost bent at Wigan .
So a difference of 0.06ppg between the two. So in effect no difference .
Your inability to admit you're wrong is highly amusing.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31104
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #294 on: May 23, 2014, 09:23:30 PM »
It's 1 point per game.

Even if you take west ham as the last game of his reign (which is nonsense in my opinion), he was in charge for 28 games, garnering 33 points, which is 1.18 points per game.
Just checked the records. Eck had an average of 1.12 ppg before he lost bent at Wigan .
So a difference of 0.06ppg between the two. So in effect no difference .

How can you take out the results after Bent got the injury for Eck, but not then take out the pre Bent Houllier results. Quite ridiculously woeful form of arguing, as you know the gap would actually widen hugely. Houllier is a multi cup winning manager in England, Eck is a befuddling negative manager that won some tin pots against an MON team in Scotland. To even compare them is incredible.

Biggest mistake we made was not moving Houllier upstairs and giving it to McAllister after that run in we had. They both had an idea of the direction they wanted to go and we would have been a much better side than we are now IMO.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #295 on: May 23, 2014, 09:29:58 PM »
I wasn't saying GED had a worse career than Eck , just that they were both pretty inept as villa managers . I don't think moving GED upstairs was an option with his constant putting down of the club , his weird distant love affair for everything Liverpool and his general demeanour which was very much - you lot you are so lucky to have me.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58608
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #296 on: May 23, 2014, 09:34:06 PM »
I must have missed the bit where he constantly put down the club.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #297 on: May 23, 2014, 09:47:30 PM »
"Aston Villa is not a club on the same level as Liverpool, let's be objective and honest,"

"It's a club that according to me has belonged between seventh and 12th place in the Premier League."


Gerard Houllier admitted yesterday that Aston Villa are not good enough to beat Manchester City – a confession the club’s spin doctors immediately tried to have struck from the record.


Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28102
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #298 on: May 23, 2014, 09:59:20 PM »
"Aston Villa is not a club on the same level as Liverpool, let's be objective and honest,"

"It's a club that according to me has belonged between seventh and 12th place in the Premier League."


Gerard Houllier admitted yesterday that Aston Villa are not good enough to beat Manchester City – a confession the club’s spin doctors immediately tried to have struck from the record.



So he massively overrated our ambition then.

Online KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14123
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: Current state of affairs
« Reply #299 on: May 23, 2014, 10:29:46 PM »
Houllier clearly has some nous when it comes to spotting players (and convincing them to sign).  We were close to getting Wanyama too, in 2011.

But he was just as likely to ostracise the players he'd signed as well as the ones he inherited. Even the French ones. So there is no guarantee that Cabaye, Makoun and so on wouldn't have fallen foul of his mood swings.  He has pursued petty, personal vendettas throughout his career.   

Although more modern in outlook than McLeish and prob even Lambert, he was still old school in the sense that the managers rule was law and the manager must have absolute control to do what he wants. Even if it means signing a whole stack of players and not playing them/ eventually letting them go at a substantial loss. That's why I don't think a bit part role such as Technical Director/ DoF would have appealed to him. He may have done that for his country, but that is different. With us, he was essentially a gun for hire.  I'm sure I read somewhere that he was offered a DoF position at the club after his health scare, but he refused. 

The point about Lerner being scared of his plans that summer is an interesting one, and one I had not really considered before.  Health issues may well have been a big concern (and they should have been from the kick off, in all honesty)  but the players we were linked with at that time wouldn't have come cheap. For a club already making huge losses, it was perhaps beyond the pale.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2014, 10:36:33 PM by KevinGage »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal