That's revisionist. He's had bad games and good games like everyone else in the team, why don't you question whether they should play in their positions? You only think this because the first time you saw Bacuna he was playing somewhere else so you got a fixed idea. He makes no errors which to me look the result of being in the wrong position - he makes mistakes because he's an enthusiastic but limited footballer, like almost all of our players.
Quote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:48:32 PMQuote from: Montbert on March 29, 2014, 01:33:47 PMQuote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:32:26 PMBacuna didn't need to dive in there - he's not a full back!Again, ask Eden Hazard if Bacuna isn't a full back. He makes one bad challenge and all of a sudden he can't play the position? That's the definition of a non-sequitur.Err how about Fulham away?Look, I've been a Bacuna fan all season but he's playing out of position.Fulham away is a better example, but how about Norwich at home? And Chelsea at home? He played well and as a full back in a full back way, which isn't just not making rash challenges - if that was the case then you could say Christian Panucci 'isn't a full-back'. Making a mistake in a position doesn't disqualify you from that position.
Quote from: Montbert on March 29, 2014, 01:33:47 PMQuote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:32:26 PMBacuna didn't need to dive in there - he's not a full back!Again, ask Eden Hazard if Bacuna isn't a full back. He makes one bad challenge and all of a sudden he can't play the position? That's the definition of a non-sequitur.Err how about Fulham away?Look, I've been a Bacuna fan all season but he's playing out of position.
Quote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:32:26 PMBacuna didn't need to dive in there - he's not a full back!Again, ask Eden Hazard if Bacuna isn't a full back. He makes one bad challenge and all of a sudden he can't play the position? That's the definition of a non-sequitur.
Bacuna didn't need to dive in there - he's not a full back!
Quote from: Montbert on March 29, 2014, 01:52:35 PMQuote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:48:32 PMQuote from: Montbert on March 29, 2014, 01:33:47 PMQuote from: Mister E on March 29, 2014, 01:32:26 PMBacuna didn't need to dive in there - he's not a full back!Again, ask Eden Hazard if Bacuna isn't a full back. He makes one bad challenge and all of a sudden he can't play the position? That's the definition of a non-sequitur.Err how about Fulham away?Look, I've been a Bacuna fan all season but he's playing out of position.Fulham away is a better example, but how about Norwich at home? And Chelsea at home? He played well and as a full back in a full back way, which isn't just not making rash challenges - if that was the case then you could say Christian Panucci 'isn't a full-back'. Making a mistake in a position doesn't disqualify you from that position.He's not a full back, IMO, even if he has done generally well. He should not have dived in: the ball and the player were going away from goal; just jockey, don't dive in!
I got to say Westy has been brilliant so far.
Quote from: Goldie.7 on March 29, 2014, 01:57:40 PMI got to say Westy has been brilliant so far.Agreed.
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: Manchester Utd vs Aston Villa Match Thread (Read 47685 times)
