Quote from: ChicagoLion on March 23, 2014, 06:32:38 PMQuote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodI thought they were a well organised physical outfit who are prepared to revert to thuggery when needed.They won every physical battle.We made them look a lot better than they are.I thought they played some decent football at times, not something that's often said about StokeAnd the thuggery was from both sides what there was of it
Quote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodI thought they were a well organised physical outfit who are prepared to revert to thuggery when needed.They won every physical battle.We made them look a lot better than they are.
Stoke were good
Quote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:44:50 PMQuote from: ChicagoLion on March 23, 2014, 06:32:38 PMQuote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodI thought they were a well organised physical outfit who are prepared to revert to thuggery when needed.They won every physical battle.We made them look a lot better than they are.I thought they played some decent football at times, not something that's often said about StokeAnd the thuggery was from both sides what there was of itYou probably had to be at the game to see that they are still a bunch of snidey, cheating, cynical bastards. That isn't as better fan than yow typer post, more the cameras wouldn't have picked up on a lot of it.
Quote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:44:50 PMQuote from: ChicagoLion on March 23, 2014, 06:32:38 PMQuote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodI thought they were a well organised physical outfit who are prepared to revert to thuggery when needed.They won every physical battle.We made them look a lot better than they are.I thought they played some decent football at times, not something that's often said about StokeAnd the thuggery was from both sides what there was of itI think they intimidated a few of our players and won most 50 50s, yes they played decent possession football from 3-1 up. They were hardly put under any pressure though.
Every now and again the Villa will come up with a performance like that. Its something we have to live with Im afraid.
Quote from: ez on March 23, 2014, 06:36:42 PMQuote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodHughes is a better manager.you must have forgotten the miracle he worked at QPR prior to Stoke then. Not saying he's not doing a good job there with his resources but let's not get too carried away. I know this will be batter Lambert week, and I'm really blaming anyone but this is how it starts. By the end of the evening Bruce, Pulis and Poyet will all be better managers.
Quote from: john e on March 23, 2014, 06:27:35 PMStoke were goodHughes is a better manager.