Quote from: ROBBO on February 25, 2014, 08:20:50 PMHe has heard Lambert is on shakey ground thats my take on it, all it needs is a couple of fans to rip up their season tickets in front of the cameras and it will be on. Kendrick is right on one point the supporters need a representative body to agitate for change when needed, this supporters trust i keep hearing about doesn't seem to do much.They are made of plastic. Bit hard to rip up. Bend, snap or throw like a frisbee, perhaps.
He has heard Lambert is on shakey ground thats my take on it, all it needs is a couple of fans to rip up their season tickets in front of the cameras and it will be on. Kendrick is right on one point the supporters need a representative body to agitate for change when needed, this supporters trust i keep hearing about doesn't seem to do much.
For a start, I cannot believe this is being hailed as a good article. It is not an article. Matt wrote better when he occasionally wrote in the mag. He says nothing.This is also not to stick it to him. His article however has a few, self serving, thrusts.1. I have tried but just can't get anything you want to read out of them.2. With the hope of the above in mind, I cannot be vehemently opposed to anything.3. With 1 in mind, you make a story (stir) and I will write about it.4. Importantly, I have noticed you starting to question why I am not questioning them.As it goes I know Matt. He is very pally with Woodhall so it is not like he can't find us when he wants to.He is a good lad but picking splinters from his arse in that piece.It is not him being given a nod with a DC5 style conspiracy theory. He has gone fishing for a story out of frustration.No more and no less. See his amusement at TV and a torn badge as an example.Bugger the polls though. He would be better off at our table of twenty in The Bartons after the match.
Quote from: cheltenhamlion on February 25, 2014, 07:47:30 PMFor a start, I cannot believe this is being hailed as a good article. It is not an article. Matt wrote better when he occasionally wrote in the mag. He says nothing.This is also not to stick it to him. His article however has a few, self serving, thrusts.1. I have tried but just can't get anything you want to read out of them.2. With the hope of the above in mind, I cannot be vehemently opposed to anything.3. With 1 in mind, you make a story (stir) and I will write about it.4. Importantly, I have noticed you starting to question why I am not questioning them.As it goes I know Matt. He is very pally with Woodhall so it is not like he can't find us when he wants to.He is a good lad but picking splinters from his arse in that piece.It is not him being given a nod with a DC5 style conspiracy theory. He has gone fishing for a story out of frustration.No more and no less. See his amusement at TV and a torn badge as an example.Bugger the polls though. He would be better off at our table of twenty in The Bartons after the match.I'm glad you posted this mate, as up until I read it I was beginning to think I was the only one who read it that way, and I was starting to question my own judgement.
I don't believe it's any conspiracy from the club nor is it a particularly great piece of journalism from Kendrick. It justs states the obvious.But I do think Lambert has turned, he looks a tired frustrated man. He's hamstrung by the restrictions placed on him by the club (which I've no doubt he was aware of), his own limitations & the fact that several key players have gone backwards. You have to ask who is responsible when the club is in the position where an injury to Westwood means that the only available midfield option is Sylla, a player plucked from some 2nd Divsion French club? Assuming we stay up, the end of the season is the point where the club have to either back him or hang him out to dry. To back him & motivate supporters going into a new season the club will need to provide far greater funds than has been available for the last 3-4 years. I, for one, will take some convincing & the club must know that this is the case for many supporters. Some supporters will be bought by the club simply sacking Lambert & starting the whole process again but I suspect this time most will not.The conundrum for the club is do they trust Lambert?
As Kendrick and the Mail have more direct access to the club than we, shouldn't he be putting these concerns to the management himself?
I hate writing long posts.As some one who constantly railed against Doug, I would take Lerner any day. Seperate debate.Stride far more nous than Faulkner.My issue with Lerner is that, good intentions aside, a leader needs to be seen leading.He avoids the limelight (no problem) but his surragate Faulkner also abdicates leadership.It is left to the mumblings of Lambert to keep us informed.I wanted Lambert to succeed as do ( I guess) most on this site.Most of us were happy with his appointment.Where do we go from here ?First Priority is to stay up.We then need some declaration of intent, where do we want to go ?What is the plan and who can take us there ?If the club are flying a kyte through Kendrick, I hope they have a plan B.It has been mentioned here many times but a respected Villa/Football man in the Management team is clearly needed.Can Lambert make it, I do not know. On current evidence no.With some Mentorship, Maybe.Why are we not shouting for his head, to me it is clear, we wanted Odreary Out, We wanted Oneil, but changed our minds. we were unsure about Houllier, nobody in their right mind wanted The Scottish one, and not because he was from Small Heath.We are too embarressed to be seen hounding out a guy we mainly wanted 18 months ago.Way forward,1st a declaration of intent from the Board and a road map.Then some open constructive debate, through what ever forum.I notice, no comment from some of the Moderators on the site who may have to, "keep their powder dry"