collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014  (Read 175981 times)

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6979
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #540 on: June 09, 2014, 06:15:18 PM »
113-4
Hain LBW T. Smith 22
Porterfield 46
Ambrose in
5 overs left

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #541 on: June 09, 2014, 06:23:14 PM »
Portsffields 50 took 258 minutes!

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6979
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #542 on: June 09, 2014, 06:31:48 PM »
Close of play
130-4
Porterfield 51
Ambrose 12

Online taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7945
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #543 on: June 09, 2014, 06:45:18 PM »
Bloody hell. That must have been depressing watching at Edgbaston today!

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #544 on: June 09, 2014, 07:55:57 PM »
Bloody hell. That must have been depressing watching at Edgbaston today!

Not much in the way of thrills and spills. I spent much of the day scanning the views from the Skyline with binoculars.

Birmingham Mail

Quote
Warwickshire v Lancashire - Day 2 close of play report

Bears plod to 130-4 in reply to Lancashire's 268 on second day at Edgbaston

Jun 09, 2014 18:52 By Brian Halford

It is usually difficult to sum up a day’s cricket in one word.

Days flow and fluctuate. Individuals do eye-catching things. The initiative shifts.

The cricket passes through phases. You can’t possibly wrap it all on in one word. Usually.

But today you could. One word says everything about the second day of Warwickshire’s  match against Lancashire. That word? Slow.

Slow. Slow. Slow. At certain points during the afternoon, in fact, as the Bears replied to Lancashire’s 268, ‘slow’ would be over-egging it in terms of pace and excitement.

Warwickshire acquired 33 for two from the first 25 overs before accelerating (the term used in the loosest sense) to 130 for four from 71 overs at the close.

It was plodding stuff with William Porterfield in the role of King Plod. Never before, surely, has the habitually forceful Irishman batted for three hours while hitting only one boundary, as he did in the first three hours of his innings yesterday.

It is a slow pitch and the ball does not come on to the bat but perhaps the batsmen did pull in their horns a tad too far. Lancashire bowled well but not that well.

Ironic cheers greeted the 100 when it came up from the last ball of the 61st over. Yet the Bears’ policy of atrition will be justified if they  achieve a first-innings lead.  A deficit could be damaging as they have to bat last on a pitch offering turn.

After Lancashire resumed  on 188 for six, they added another 98. Warwickshire have been troubled by wagging tails lately - in the last three games Middlesex and Yorkshire added 101 and 150 for the last two wickets and Somerset’s last pair put on 69.

This time Tom Smith was the tail-stiffener, gritting his way to 50 in 217 minutes before playing on to Boyd Rankin.

Smith was well-supported by Glen Chapple (33, 62 balls) and when Kabir Ali lifted Jeetan Patel to long on, the last four wickets had added 111.

Warwickshire’s reply slipped straight into the slow lane and stayed there. After Varun Chopra paid for an early attempt to attack, edging Ali to second slip, attempts to attack were kept to an absolute minimum.

Porterfield and Ateeq Javid added 20 in 16 overs before the latter (seven from 49 balls) fell to a Chapple yorker.

Javid has batted well in T20 but his championship struggles go on - 88 runs in nine innings with six of the last seven failing to reach double-figures.

Porterfield and Laurie Evans added 31 in 17 overs before the latter (20, 65) sliced Kyle Hogg to slip. Evans, in a similar championship trough to Javid, departed in anguish at having failed to exploit 65 minutes’ diligent groundwork.

Still there was Porterfield. He added 51 in 25 overs with Sam Hain (25, 81) who fell lbw just before the close. That was quite handy as Smith’s stentorian appeal woke up a number of spectators just in time to go home.


Online Richard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2626
  • GM : 08.06.2024
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #545 on: June 09, 2014, 10:08:04 PM »
I was there for my first game this season - painful viewing !


Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #546 on: June 09, 2014, 11:22:24 PM »
Proper cricket then!

Might pop down tomorrow if the forecast stays reasonably okay.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72945
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #547 on: June 10, 2014, 12:29:07 AM »
Ian Bell wins England Cricketer of the Year, and what an excellent picture the BBC have chosen to illustrate the point.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/27771886

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72945
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #548 on: June 10, 2014, 09:37:13 AM »
They've changed the picture. Twats. It was him in a Villa shirt before.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #549 on: June 10, 2014, 01:39:48 PM »
Very good morning session. Clark and Ambrose played some excellent shots. 234 for 5 at lunch. Ambrose 61 Clark 49.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #550 on: June 10, 2014, 02:01:19 PM »
Clarke now on 52. Should have read 46 at lunch. Ambrose gone. Barker in. 247 for 6.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #551 on: June 10, 2014, 02:08:14 PM »
Clarke out for 56 bowled round his legs by Kerrigan. Patel in with Barker.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #552 on: June 10, 2014, 03:16:01 PM »
All out for 332. Barker unbeaten on 44.

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13820
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #553 on: June 10, 2014, 03:40:50 PM »
Lancs 45 for 0 off 5.1.
Hmm.

Offline Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13945
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: Bears/Pears Cricket Thread 2014
« Reply #554 on: June 10, 2014, 03:44:57 PM »
Quite a difference in the boundary count on the scorecard, with numbers 6 - 11 notching 26 4's between them compared with just 11 from numbers 1 - 5. Looks like they went for it today.

As are Lancashire!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal