I was going to say, which top line batsmen did well? I don't remember any.
Also our bowling was poor mainly because they had no scoreboard pressure to bowl to in the 2nd innings and had to get back out there after 60 overs time after time. We had the Aussie top order in trouble loads of times but ran out of stream. Swanny's injury and general state of not really wantin to be there didn't help either as we had to keep going back to our knackered seam attack.The batting was dreadful all tour long.
Quote from: peter w on November 05, 2014, 10:26:22 PMTo be fair our top line batsmen played in well enough in the last Ashes series. It was the lower order batsmen that were blown away.That's not true, the only batsman who averaged over 30 was Stokes and his figures were heavily influenced by his century (the only 1 we scored on the tour). You can look at the stats below, there really is no silver lining for the batting displays, as a team we let Johnson and Harris totally dominate us to the point where it was embarrassingly 1sided. The bowling as poor as well and clearly our lower order batting was abysmal but averages like we saw from the top order can't happen if you want to win things.http://stats.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2013-14/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=7899;team=1;type=series
To be fair our top line batsmen played in well enough in the last Ashes series. It was the lower order batsmen that were blown away.
Quote from: paul_e on November 06, 2014, 12:22:18 PMQuote from: peter w on November 05, 2014, 10:26:22 PMTo be fair our top line batsmen played in well enough in the last Ashes series. It was the lower order batsmen that were blown away.That's not true, the only batsman who averaged over 30 was Stokes and his figures were heavily influenced by his century (the only 1 we scored on the tour). You can look at the stats below, there really is no silver lining for the batting displays, as a team we let Johnson and Harris totally dominate us to the point where it was embarrassingly 1sided. The bowling as poor as well and clearly our lower order batting was abysmal but averages like we saw from the top order can't happen if you want to win things.http://stats.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2013-14/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=7899;team=1;type=seriesWhat I mean was that we weren't blown away by Johnson. that was the lower order. Not that anyone came out of the series with any real credit.
An amazing innings from Rohit Sharma just now 264 (173) 33 x 4's & 9 x 6's in a total of 404 v Sri Lanka.He was dropped on 4, a pretty expensive one as it turned out, it took him 72 balls to get to 50 which in effect means he scored 214 off 101 balls,incredible.He is the first player to score 2 x 200's in ODI's.He was out off the last ball of the innings which was a shame he desrved to finish not out.He didn't quite beat the highest List A score just missing out on beating Alastair Brown's 268 for Surrey which he most certainly would have equalled had he not been caught on the boundary.I don't hold much hope for Sri Lanka in their reply!!!
Quote from: PGW on November 13, 2014, 12:04:09 PMAn amazing innings from Rohit Sharma just now 264 (173) 33 x 4's & 9 x 6's in a total of 404 v Sri Lanka.He was dropped on 4, a pretty expensive one as it turned out, it took him 72 balls to get to 50 which in effect means he scored 214 off 101 balls,incredible.He is the first player to score 2 x 200's in ODI's.He was out off the last ball of the innings which was a shame he desrved to finish not out.He didn't quite beat the highest List A score just missing out on beating Alastair Brown's 268 for Surrey which he most certainly would have equalled had he not been caught on the boundary.I don't hold much hope for Sri Lanka in their reply!!!That's a phenomenal effort. How many dot balls did he face?
Quote from: Villan For Life on November 13, 2014, 12:52:01 PMQuote from: PGW on November 13, 2014, 12:04:09 PMAn amazing innings from Rohit Sharma just now 264 (173) 33 x 4's & 9 x 6's in a total of 404 v Sri Lanka.He was dropped on 4, a pretty expensive one as it turned out, it took him 72 balls to get to 50 which in effect means he scored 214 off 101 balls,incredible.He is the first player to score 2 x 200's in ODI's.He was out off the last ball of the innings which was a shame he desrved to finish not out.He didn't quite beat the highest List A score just missing out on beating Alastair Brown's 268 for Surrey which he most certainly would have equalled had he not been caught on the boundary.I don't hold much hope for Sri Lanka in their reply!!!That's a phenomenal effort. How many dot balls did he face?58
... Rohit's innings was so ludicrous that the first 100 runs, which were hit at a run-a-ball, seems achingly humdrum in comparison to the 164 that followed. The surge had actually begun before he reached his century, when he plundered 14 runs in four balls, in Nuwan Kulasekara's 30th over. Soon after that, the ball would be leaping off the middle of his bat with almost every stroke he offered.There were many incredible shots, from among his 33 fours and nine sixes, but the most gobsmacking was the six off Kulasekara at the end of the 48th over, when he walked across to off stump, took a half volley from about a foot and half away from him and flicked it high over the midwicket boundary. It was the kind of shot, and innings, that seemed in open defiance of physics. ...