The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull

[WestleyArmsAV]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

[Clampy]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

But you were moaning the other day that the attendances down VP were embarrassing, so you'd be contributing to it. Tut, some fan.

[edgysatsuma89]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

You would still be watching the same awful football that he serves up regardless, just a few miles away. So i don't really see the point in therefore not going to VP, as the reason you wouldn't be going there is ... Pulis? You'd just support his awful football elsewhere? I don't get the point.

[supertom]

[Clampy]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

You would still be watching the same awful football that he serves up regardless, just a few miles away. So i don't really see the point in therefore not going to VP, as the reason you wouldn't be going there is ... Pulis? You'd just support his awful football elsewhere? I don't get the point.

I've come to the conclusion that he's not very bright.

[edgysatsuma89]

Love him. Love that GIF.

And I agree Clampy.

[Drummond]

This thread is beginning to become a little embarrassing.

[pauliewalnuts]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

You would still be watching the same awful football that he serves up regardless, just a few miles away. So i don't really see the point in therefore not going to VP, as the reason you wouldn't be going there is ... Pulis? You'd just support his awful football elsewhere? I don't get the point.

His argument is basically this.

Scenario 1 - Lots of people on here suggesting Lambert is not good enough - having actually observed him doing the job for over two years - are somehow not proper supporters, they are laptop warriors who don't go to matches, like real fans do. Like he does.

Scenario 2 - if we were, hypothetically, to appoint Pulis, then he would not set foot in Villa Park, in protest.

Obviously, the glaring hole in the above argument is that he is applying a different set of standards for himself - he, being a SuperFan, is perfectly within his rights to talk about boycotting home matches in protest to the appointment of a man who has never actually been our manager, whereas other people, not going to matches because of a manager who has actually been doing the job for over two years, well they are half-arsed, fickle laptop warriors.

[Des Little]

What a load of old bollocks.  Can we draw a line under this nonsense now? 

[Dave Cooper please]

I haven't paid to watch Villa for about two years now, I think that possibly makes me the worst fan on this forum.

[pbavfckuwait]

I haven't been since Spurs birthday party at White Shite Lane, I am the worse Villa fan that ever walked the earth and he has driven me to finding some rope and a chair I just cant live with myself.
Mind you I have lived in the Middle East for that last 8 years.

[Holte L2]

95% of the top flight clubs would not have 25% of their total gate missing for a Sunday home game v Spurs.

Still avoiding what you said about if Pulis came in? That you wouldn't go?

You're a shiiiit fan.

If you read the comment correctly I said I would not step foot in VP again, I would still travel to away games.  The gloating of the prawn sandwich brigade at VP at the dismissal of PL and the arrival of the saviour of AVFC, Tony Pulis would be too much for this shiiiit fan to take.

Roll on Burnley next Saturday.

You would still be watching the same awful football that he serves up regardless, just a few miles away. So i don't really see the point in therefore not going to VP, as the reason you wouldn't be going there is ... Pulis? You'd just support his awful football elsewhere? I don't get the point.

His argument is basically this.

Scenario 1 - Lots of people on here suggesting Lambert is not good enough - having actually observed him doing the job for over two years - are somehow not proper supporters, they are laptop warriors who don't go to matches, like real fans do. Like he does.

Scenario 2 - if we were, hypothetically, to appoint Pulis, then he would not set foot in Villa Park, in protest.

Obviously, the glaring hole in the above argument is that he is applying a different set of standards for himself - he, being a SuperFan, is perfectly within his rights to talk about boycotting home matches in protest to the appointment of a man who has never actually been our manager, whereas other people, not going to matches because of a manager who has actually been doing the job for over two years, well they are half-arsed, fickle laptop warriors.

I'm a season ticket holder and go to 98% of away matches. 

I think Lambert's tactically inept, and the style of football we've been serving is diabolical.

Neither do I want Tony Pulis.

Where do I stand is his scenarios?

[Lucky Eddie]

I haven't paid to watch Villa for about two years now, I think that possibly makes me the worst fan on this forum.

I doubt if you'd even be close.

[LeeB]

I haven't been since Spurs birthday party at White Shite Lane, I am the worse Villa fan that ever walked the earth and he has driven me to finding some rope and a chair I just cant live with myself.
Mind you I have lived in the Middle East for that last 8 years.

Part timer.

[Tom_Mc9?]

I don't know who we're playing next and I don't get angry if we lose. I'm hardly bothered nowadays - I'm just intrigued to see the different ways we manage to bugger everything up.

I'm a worse supporter than you.