collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Somniloquism
[Today at 03:08:41 PM]


Matty Cash by GarTomas
[Today at 03:08:41 PM]


Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by Demitri_C
[Today at 03:07:41 PM]


Leon Bailey by Demitri_C
[Today at 03:06:55 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle Match Thread by Stu82
[Today at 02:35:11 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:18:22 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1757895 times)

Offline Rudy65

  • Member
  • Posts: 4560
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5160 on: April 27, 2014, 04:48:38 PM »
Can we ask the Swansea City board to appoint our next manager, they seem to have a decent track record.

Id prefer we simply employ their last manager

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29211
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5161 on: April 27, 2014, 04:49:53 PM »
Can we ask the Swansea City board to appoint our next manager, they seem to have a decent track record.

Id prefer we simply employ their last manager

There's a reason he went. I don't get the Laudrup love-in - the cloud under which he leaves every club should be enough to cause a bit a caution.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26271
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5162 on: April 27, 2014, 05:06:59 PM »
As many have said, he deserves no sympathy, he is just no good at his job.

Yes the bigger problem is Lerner and Faulkner, but despite that Lambert has been given enough resources to achieve better than the humiliating results and performances that has been served up.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31051
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5163 on: April 27, 2014, 05:10:39 PM »
He has had 45 million ish. Plenty to get to mid table even with wage restrictions.

Offline KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14112
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5164 on: April 27, 2014, 05:54:20 PM »


Lerner said it unequivocally in the week, Lambert is working to his instructions. If we had kept key players fit we would probably be in a comfortable mid table position but the enforced policy of buying only players who do not demand high wages means we have little resilience in the squad. As has been clearly demonstrated in recent weeks, it is a strategy fraught with risk and unless it changes one that will inevitably eventually takes us down.

As one of the more positive  posters, it's sad to see you say that.

Sad, but probably accurate.

I do still think there is validity in signing players who see Villa as a step up in their careers, rather than the likes of Dunne, Ireland, Hutton and co.

But we need someone capable of spotting those kind of gems to execute that strategy.  Lambert can't.

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36442
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5165 on: April 27, 2014, 06:06:50 PM »
He has had 45 million ish. Plenty to get to mid table even with wage restrictions.

It is, if the major purchases are playing - unfortunately we haven't been able to put them on the pitch often enough this season. We've got a mid table first team but a bottom 6 squad.

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5166 on: April 27, 2014, 06:14:47 PM »
Sack him now. Why bother persisting with him? What is he bringing to the table right now? I don't think anybody could do any worse and they might just do slightly better. Slightly better might be enough.
I'd do it now and give whoever takes over a week to plan. So I guess it would be Sid.

Offline David_Nab

  • Member
  • Posts: 4285
  • Location: Luton
  • GM : 24.12.2015
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5167 on: April 27, 2014, 06:18:08 PM »
It's a point where with the current results AND the sacking of his right hand men that him going surely has to be an option to help the team for the last 3 games.I can't see what benefit it does keeping him around other than to have someone for the fans to vent at

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31051
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5168 on: April 27, 2014, 06:21:01 PM »
He has had 45 million ish. Plenty to get to mid table even with wage restrictions.

It is, if the major purchases are playing - unfortunately we haven't been able to put them on the pitch often enough this season. We've got a mid table first team but a bottom 6 squad.

i agree but its a squad he has built

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5169 on: April 27, 2014, 06:24:53 PM »
Sack him now. Why bother persisting with him? What is he bringing to the table right now? I don't think anybody could do any worse and they might just do slightly better. Slightly better might be enough.
I'd do it now and give whoever takes over a week to plan. So I guess it would be Sid.
I imagine they may not be sacking him based on not wanting to pay him off. Maybe there's a clause saying sub 40 points after 38 games and you are out ?? Just a thought

Offline Lee

  • Member
  • Posts: 11061
  • Location: Tividale - on the South Staffs Thick
    • http://astonvilla.blogfootball.com/BlackCountryVilla/
  • GM : Jul, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5170 on: April 27, 2014, 06:27:48 PM »
He has had 45 million ish. Plenty to get to mid table even with wage restrictions.

It is, if the major purchases are playing - unfortunately we haven't been able to put them on the pitch often enough this season. We've got a mid table first team but a bottom 6 squad.

i agree but its a squad he has built

And the opportunities that he has missed in the Transfer windows, especially the January ones.

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5171 on: April 27, 2014, 06:40:10 PM »
I've noticed the people who want him to stay is up at 57? Unbelieveable

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59481
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5172 on: April 27, 2014, 06:45:40 PM »
It's an old set of poll options. I did suggest a new set but no-one replied so I did not bother changing it. You can always re-vote.

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34337
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5173 on: April 28, 2014, 12:01:47 AM »
He has had 45 million ish. Plenty to get to mid table even with wage restrictions.

exactly on top of  the players he already had that he plays a lot . Gabby , weiman , Delph , Baker , Clark and Guzan ( free resign )

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34337
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #5174 on: April 28, 2014, 12:03:33 AM »
plus he should have gone with the other two plonkers

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal