collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Standard of Refereeing by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:43:57 AM]


Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:41:29 AM]


Amadou Onana by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:15:57 AM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:43:04 AM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:41:14 AM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:22:37 AM]


FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:12:28 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:09:44 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Standard of Refereeing by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:43:57 AM]


Re: Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:41:29 AM]


Re: Amadou Onana by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:15:57 AM]


Re: Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:43:04 AM]


Re: Loanwatch 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:41:14 AM]


Re: Season Ticket 2025/26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:22:37 AM]


Re: Loanwatch 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:20:06 AM]


Re: FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:12:28 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1764357 times)

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15660
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3690 on: April 09, 2014, 11:42:22 PM »
he signed some bloke called Benteke in his first window. Lowton was very good at times. He resigned Guzan

Benteke is a bloody good player but Lowton is as average as they come.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58533
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3691 on: April 10, 2014, 01:02:39 AM »
he signed some bloke called Benteke in his first window. Lowton was very good at times. He resigned Guzan

Benteke is a bloody good player but Lowton is as average as they come.

Lowton was at times excellent last season and scored one great goal and another, arguably one of the best goals ever scored for the club. Remember, this is a commentary on Lambert's first window so Lowton should overall be considered a success. That he has regressed since should not be a commentary on that window, as most would agree he looked a very good signing last season.

Offline ciggiesnbeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 6794
  • Location: Mass hysteria for Aston Villa. Some team from the mountains in Russia
  • GM : 23.01.2019
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3692 on: April 10, 2014, 01:32:31 AM »
To top it all, he appears to have the personality of Father Stone.

Disagree with most of your post but this bit was well played.  ;D

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35547
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3693 on: April 10, 2014, 09:43:45 AM »
To top it all, he appears to have the personality of Father Stone.

Disagree with most of your post but this bit was well played.  ;D

"Are you in a relegation battle, Paul?"

"No, we're fine."

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18135
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3694 on: April 10, 2014, 09:58:33 AM »
I wanted Rodgers but was happy enough with Lambert, right up until his first transfer window. Some managers have a knack of finding a hidden gem here and there, but no one can find a whole team full. It reminded me of when I worked in Evesham, which was blessed with an abundance of pound shops. I marvelled at how much money I could save and went out every lunch time buying stuff and wondering why people paid over the odds. Well, the twisty wire for tying plants was fine, but pretty much everything else broke or didn't work. I hoped that I would be wrong but I just couldn't see that anyone could be such a brilliant visionary to build a team from nowt with lower league signings.

Sadly, he hasn't proved me wrong except that the bits I thought he might be good at like tactics (I remember there was a lot of discussion about how good he was at changing formations to suit the opposition etc) he isn't. To top it all, he appears to have the personality of Father Stone.
I don't think your analogy of the Evesham pound shops is appropriate or fair (although, to be honest,  I've never availed myself of the delights of Evesham's shopping emporia). Lambert's purchasing policy and record has been decent - at the time of most of the signings, many commentators were applauding his insight and eye for a good deal.


The problem has been one of tactics and coaching: the new players have, in the main, shown promise but have either been (i) overplayed or (ii) played out of position or (iii) not been given the coaching and feedback about how to correct faults and develop strengths. Or, a combination of all three.
For this, Lambert and his team should rightly be panned.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2014, 10:00:20 AM by Mister E »

Offline Chico Hamilton III

  • Member
  • Posts: 19657
  • Location: South London
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3695 on: April 10, 2014, 10:13:00 AM »
So is the consensus that Lambert is a good scout but a shit coach?

Offline Boz

  • Member
  • Posts: 1924
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3696 on: April 10, 2014, 10:27:51 AM »
So is the consensus that Lambert is a good scout but a shit coach?

Just about sums it up  ::)

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3697 on: April 10, 2014, 11:19:56 AM »
even that is a bit generous. the list of genuinely talented players he's actually bought is pretty short.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3698 on: April 10, 2014, 11:29:06 AM »
even that is a bit generous. the list of genuinely talented players he's actually bought is pretty short.

I think it's hard to say on that either way as the team hasn't played well enough as a whole to allow them to shine.  I certainly think players like Westwood, Lowton and Bacuna have ability.

Where I think we've gotten it wrong is the attitude of the squad.  Young and hungry seems to be the mantra, but I'm not seeing any real hunger or desire from this set of players on the pitch.  It's almost as if they have fallen into a comfort zone of low expectations and long term progression, so that wheh they lose a game they expect it to be viewed as "Not to worry - it'll be OK next season."  To me that's a lack of real leadership on the pitch.  And possibly from the dugout.   

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3699 on: April 10, 2014, 12:27:28 PM »
Did we not lose the scout from his first window? The man who was in part responsible for most of his better signings, and of course, Benteke. Even McLeish once tried to claim Benteke was on the radar before Lambert joined, unless I'm imagining that.
Can't remember the fellas name, but I'd certainly say that our second summer hasn't proved as fruitful so far. Obviously injuries mean it's been very hard to judge Kozak and more so Okore, but thus far, only Bacuna ranks as a success.

I'm not sure the current scouting set up is as good as it has previously been under Lambert, so his ability to make potentially good signings is possibly more questionable than previously.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15660
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3700 on: April 10, 2014, 12:32:11 PM »
he signed some bloke called Benteke in his first window. Lowton was very good at times. He resigned Guzan

Benteke is a bloody good player but Lowton is as average as they come.

Lowton was at times excellent last season and scored one great goal and another, arguably one of the best goals ever scored for the club. Remember, this is a commentary on Lambert's first window so Lowton should overall be considered a success. That he has regressed since should not be a commentary on that window, as most would agree he looked a very good signing last season.

I never rated him from day one. He's as average as they come. His appalling positional play cost us important goals last season and I've never thought he was good enough for Aston Villa despite him scoring a decent goal near the end of the season

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58533
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3701 on: April 10, 2014, 12:36:05 PM »
Lowton's goal at Stoke was "decent"?

Ok...if you say so

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2847
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3702 on: April 10, 2014, 12:53:22 PM »
Lowton was at times excellent last season and scored one great goal and another, arguably one of the best goals ever scored for the club. Remember, this is a commentary on Lambert's first window so Lowton should overall be considered a success. That he has regressed since should not be a commentary on that window, as most would agree he looked a very good signing last season.

Since when was a full backs success measured on him scoring a couple of great goals ?

I like Lowton, but i still doubt he's a defender. I think he'd be a better player further upfield. But the jury is very much still out on whether he's been a good signing for me

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58533
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3703 on: April 10, 2014, 12:59:49 PM »
Lowton was at times excellent last season and scored one great goal and another, arguably one of the best goals ever scored for the club. Remember, this is a commentary on Lambert's first window so Lowton should overall be considered a success. That he has regressed since should not be a commentary on that window, as most would agree he looked a very good signing last season.

Since when was a full backs success measured on him scoring a couple of great goals ?

I like Lowton, but i still doubt he's a defender. I think he'd be a better player further upfield. But the jury is very much still out on whether he's been a good signing for me

I didn't say that he should be judged or measured purely on his goals. There was plenty of talk last season because of his overall form of a late push for the WC squad. Certainly his goals and some of his assists/crossing drew more attention than his defending, but he wasn't a complete liability at the back.

Offline rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9659
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3704 on: April 10, 2014, 01:03:39 PM »
Lowton was at times excellent last season and scored one great goal and another, arguably one of the best goals ever scored for the club. Remember, this is a commentary on Lambert's first window so Lowton should overall be considered a success. That he has regressed since should not be a commentary on that window, as most would agree he looked a very good signing last season.

Since when was a full backs success measured on him scoring a couple of great goals ?

I like Lowton, but i still doubt he's a defender. I think he'd be a better player further upfield. But the jury is very much still out on whether he's been a good signing for me

I didn't say that he should be judged or measured purely on his goals. There was plenty of talk last season because of his overall form of a late push for the WC squad. Certainly his goals and some of his assists/crossing drew more attention than his defending, but he wasn't a complete liability at the back.

Lowton was often played in MF for Sheff Utd.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal