collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 05:39:11 PM]


Amadou Onana by brontebilly
[Today at 05:26:53 PM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by Gareth
[Today at 05:24:48 PM]


FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:22:04 PM]


Unai Emery by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 05:13:54 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 04:53:43 PM]


Games Moved for TV by Des Little
[Today at 04:46:48 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 04:29:22 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2014.  (Read 58259 times)

Offline PGW

  • Member
  • Posts: 6979
  • Age: 71
  • Location: Selly Oak
  • Villan, Bear and now Cancer Warrior
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #165 on: May 31, 2014, 11:32:18 PM »
I don't think I've ever got a fight prediction right.
i'm with you there Dave...i fancied St George!
After 3 rounds of Mitchell fight i thought there's an 'ammering' on the way for Mitchell....so wrong.

Offline DrGonzo

  • Member
  • Posts: 6175
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Over the border, under the hill, on the farm.
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #166 on: May 31, 2014, 11:48:14 PM »
The first fight I've watched with Mrs Gonz, she's not much of a one for organised violence, and she loved it.  Excellent, cagey to begin, opened out, the slight air of desperation when Froch thought he might be undone in the 7th and a belter of a right cross that was beautifully set up by a left feint.  The first real attempt Froch had made to unwind a big right hand.  The seasoned pro putting a young pup squarely in his place.  Thought Groves showed a distinct lack of class in the build and the post match interviews and am thoroughly glad the belts remained in place.

  Props to Degale also who showed a different dimension to his boxing this evening.  The first sign that he may not be a plodding journeyman after all.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63384
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #167 on: May 31, 2014, 11:50:48 PM »
I don't think I've ever got a fight prediction right.
i'm with you there Dave...i fancied St George!
After 3 rounds of Mitchell fight i thought there's an 'ammering' on the way for Mitchell....so wrong.

I look forward to watching the entire card later. I agree with you about McCracken - his career was marred by the wankers who followed him (although I don't think Gavin's are as bad)  but he's a quality trainer.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #168 on: May 31, 2014, 11:55:39 PM »
Groves has all the skills but lacks a really big punch and it looks like he can't take one either! Mind you, that would have finished most boxers.

Groves might well win a world title in one of the acronyms but he won't be half the champion Froch has been.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37294
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #169 on: June 01, 2014, 12:23:23 AM »
Groves has all the skills but lacks a really big punch and it looks like he can't take one either! Mind you, that would have finished most boxers.

Groves might well win a world title in one of the acronyms but he won't be half the champion Froch has been.

Not fair to say he can't take a punch, Froch suckered him and then landed one that'd have downed a bear, that was as good a knock out punch as I've seen.  I do agree that Groves hasn't got the power to compete at the very top, he's got very quick hands though so he'll always give people a tough time.

He was outdone by a boxer who is rightly regarded one of the best for a generation, I don't think Froch saw Groves as a threat for the first fight, this time he took him more seriously, started much better and was in control for most of the fight for me.  Groves did land a few clean blows but it never looked like being anything but a Froch win for me.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #170 on: June 01, 2014, 01:04:25 AM »
De Gale's win was impressive as well, but I reckon he should steer clear of Froch just now, he's not ready for that.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55289
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #171 on: June 01, 2014, 01:08:57 AM »
Impressive stuff.

Online aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11778
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #172 on: June 01, 2014, 08:00:44 AM »
I'm glad the belts stayed with Froch and he ended it conclusively, if it had gone to points there were enough rounds close enough to have Groves claiming he'd won. Groves was not very popular where I was watching the fight.

Offline Lizz

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 16994
  • GM : 16.03.2022
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #173 on: June 01, 2014, 09:49:59 AM »
I don't think I've ever got a fight prediction right.

On the very rare occasions I bet on something where there can only be one winner, after I've decided who I think will win, I bet on their opponent. With stakes of less than £5, there's been no noticeable change to my finances.

Offline ADVILLAFAN

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13253
  • Location: Shirley
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #174 on: June 02, 2014, 03:35:11 PM »
I'm glad the belts stayed with Froch and he ended it conclusively, if it had gone to points there were enough rounds close enough to have Groves claiming he'd won. Groves was not very popular where I was watching the fight.

He's a Chelsea fan and comes across as a cocky c*nt.

Is that Yafdi a Villa fan? They said he's from Brum.

Offline Ron Manager

  • Member
  • Posts: 5710
  • Location: Staffordshire
  • GM : 03.04.2016
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #175 on: June 03, 2014, 11:42:47 AM »
I think Eddie Hearn was hoping for a Groves win so they would meet again for a third time... which they possibly might, if the money on the table dictates.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #176 on: June 03, 2014, 11:18:19 PM »
No, no point for Froch unless he loses his next couple of fights. But at his age he'd just retire. groves is out of the picture now.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37294
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #177 on: June 03, 2014, 11:44:52 PM »
No, no point for Froch unless he loses his next couple of fights. But at his age he'd just retire. groves is out of the picture now.

Groves vs Degale in about a year will be billed as a fight to replace Froch at the top, I think Groves will win it and have a decent career but I don't think he'll ever have the power to rule the division like Froch has.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #178 on: June 04, 2014, 12:17:09 AM »
No, no point for Froch unless he loses his next couple of fights. But at his age he'd just retire. groves is out of the picture now.

Groves vs Degale in about a year will be billed as a fight to replace Froch at the top, I think Groves will win it and have a decent career but I don't think he'll ever have the power to rule the division like Froch has.
Andre Ward might want to have a word.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37294
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Boxing thread 2014.
« Reply #179 on: June 04, 2014, 10:53:25 AM »
No, no point for Froch unless he loses his next couple of fights. But at his age he'd just retire. groves is out of the picture now.

Groves vs Degale in about a year will be billed as a fight to replace Froch at the top, I think Groves will win it and have a decent career but I don't think he'll ever have the power to rule the division like Froch has.
Andre Ward might want to have a word.


Sorry, I meant in the UK, I wasn't clear about that but I think they'll have a fight to be announced as our next big thing.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal