collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by VillaTim
[Today at 09:55:54 PM]


A strange pre-seson by dave.woodhall
[Today at 09:38:12 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 09:15:13 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 09:00:33 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:03:13 PM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:51:49 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Pete3206
[Today at 05:19:31 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Demitri_C
[Today at 02:08:18 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by VillaTim
[Today at 09:55:54 PM]


Re: FFP by ChicagoLion
[Today at 09:53:23 PM]


Re: FFP by VillaTim
[Today at 09:49:55 PM]


A strange pre-seson by dave.woodhall
[Today at 09:38:12 PM]


Re: Season Ticket 2025/26 by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 09:15:13 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 09:00:33 PM]


Re: Season Ticket 2025/26 by Mister E
[Today at 08:30:29 PM]


Re: Season Ticket 2025/26 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 08:26:21 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan  (Read 151134 times)

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74469
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #750 on: January 15, 2014, 11:45:58 AM »
Given that it is Wigan Holt has come from, if we are paying all his wages, I fully expect that gobshite Dave Whelan to appear on SSN within the next week, talking about it

Offline SheffieldVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 2812
  • Location: Poland
  • GM : 18.02.2022
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #751 on: January 15, 2014, 11:46:38 AM »
Even on a short term loan I just don't see what Holt will offer us.

1) Cover for Kozak
2) As somone who has played and scored in the premier league, he'll be a step up from the likes of Bowery
3) He'll be a 'leader' in a team that's desperately short of them
4) He's cheap
1- Do we really need cover for Kozak? Or should we have more faith in Helenius? How many times on here did we all debate whether we even needed to sign Kozak in the first place? He has done well to be fair, but it was still strange to sign a front men, being a position we've been loaded in. If Benteke does now find form, I'd not be surprised to see Weimann's game pick up too.
2- He's unfit, he's slow and lets face it, the ball isn't going to be arrowed with homing missile accuracy to him. He's gonna have to chase the thing and then he's not gonna look very good. We need our strikers running, and I'd actually play Bowery ahead of him.
3- He was skipper at Norwich, but he's coming into a new squad now, he's hardly been a "leader" at Wigan. I'm also not sure he's the best role model. He's hardly inspirational, and if, as expected, he's only going to play 10 minutes here and there, he can't do much. We need quality leaders playing on the pitch.
4- He's not that cheap.

1. Does it ever hurt to have extra cover?
2/3. He's unfit and not inspirational. How do you know this? Have you watched him in training?
4. He's on loan and we don't know how much he is being paid. On what basis can you state he is expensive?
He's earning 28 grand a week. Yes that's not expensive in todays market but it isn't cheap. It's also IMO 28k out of our wage budget that could have been better used. It's still a lot to pay for "a bit of extra cover." We should be concentrating on improving our first 11.
I think the reaction of everyone at Wigan tells you everything you need to know about his condition in all honesty. Last season for Norwich he struggled to reproduce what he had the year before and fitness was part of that issue.

Again, we don't know that we're paying the whole £28k.

'The reaction of everyone at Wigan' - a bit of an over-the-top statement no? What, they've had street parties upon his departure? Or do you just mean that he wasn't playing regularly?
We don't know for sure about paying the whole thing, but I'd safely assume it given that Dave Whelan is a man who more often than not will get his own way and he'll want us paying it all. We may have even paid a fee on top.

Wigan fans are generally finding it quite amusing. I'm not being funny but if people aren't expecting a lot of choruses of "you fat bastard!" from opposition fans when Holt plays, you'd be mistaken. I saw him a few times last season lumbering around and yes, he's not been playing regularly for a club in the Championship. He's older now, looks less fit. I just can't see him offering much on the pitch. If he happens to bag the winner against WBA, I'll happily eat my humble pie however.


1. You're making a lot of assumptions.
2. Who cares what supporters of other teams think or chant?

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #752 on: January 15, 2014, 11:47:11 AM »
Without spoiling the thread am I allowed to be underwhelmed but calmly accepting of what is just a four month loan deal which I don't think will effect what we do or don't do regarding any other transfer window moves?

The big question isn't about Holt, it's the other players we need in. Fingers crossed something happens there.

Sometimes the collective despair on here is quite impressive. The last day of the January window last year was a stormer, when we signed Dawkins and Sylla.

I wonder if the 'Matthew Upson - confirmed on loan' thread will reach fifty pages quicker than this one?

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #753 on: January 15, 2014, 11:47:49 AM »
[He's unfit

Sorry, I didn't realize you have ITK with the trainers at Wigan.  Maybe you'd like to reporoduce their reports for us?

3- He was skipper at Norwich

Indeed, when Lambert was manager, and it worked very well - of course he'll be working with different players but Lambert will have taken that into account, because he worked with both sets.  Thanks for confirming my argument.
I saw enough of Holt last season at Norwich. I won't reproduce a report I'll just go and ask a Wigan fan for their opinion and record the howls of laughter.

We'll see just how influential Holt can be from the bench every game. About as influential as Culverhouse I'd imagine.

If we sign a couple of midfielders and defensive cover in the next 2 weeks, I'll have no problem carrying Holt. But for what he's going to offer, and what our football will continue to be like, there's no way 28 grand a week will be value for money.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #754 on: January 15, 2014, 11:48:46 AM »
Without spoiling the thread am I allowed to be underwhelmed but calmly accepting of what is just a four month loan deal which I don't think will effect what we do or don't do regarding any other transfer window moves?

The big question isn't about Holt, it's the other players we need in. Fingers crossed something happens there.

Sometimes the collective despair on here is quite impressive. The last day of the January window last year was a stormer, when we signed Dawkins and Sylla.

I wonder if the 'Matthew Upson - confirmed on loan' thread will reach fifty pages quicker than this one?
That one might break the internet I think.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #755 on: January 15, 2014, 11:49:11 AM »

'The reaction of everyone at Wigan'

I conducted my own survey and mentioned it to my other half who is from Wigan.

Me: Villa have borrowed a player from Wigan.
Her : Who?
Me : Villa
Her : No, who have they borrowed?
Me : Grant Holt
Her : I've never heard of him

To be honest she doesn't have much interest in football but thought I'd do my bit. I might ask her mum what she thinks but that would mean having to phone her and to be honest I'd probably get a similar answer so I'll leave at that and conclude that Wigan aren't really that arsed about it.

Offline SashasGrandad

  • Member
  • Posts: 3260
  • Age: 66
  • Location: Retired in Walsall Wood
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #756 on: January 15, 2014, 11:49:22 AM »
Without spoiling the thread am I allowed to be underwhelmed but calmly accepting of what is just a four month loan deal which I don't think will effect what we do or don't do regarding any other transfer window moves?

Yes

I suppose we need cover if Bowery gets injured!

Offline not3bad

  • Member
  • Posts: 12218
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 15.06.2022
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #757 on: January 15, 2014, 11:51:38 AM »
[He's unfit

Sorry, I didn't realize you have ITK with the trainers at Wigan.  Maybe you'd like to reporoduce their reports for us?

3- He was skipper at Norwich

Indeed, when Lambert was manager, and it worked very well - of course he'll be working with different players but Lambert will have taken that into account, because he worked with both sets.  Thanks for confirming my argument.
I saw enough of Holt last season at Norwich. I won't reproduce a report I'll just go and ask a Wigan fan for their opinion and record the howls of laughter.

We'll see just how influential Holt can be from the bench every game. About as influential as Culverhouse I'd imagine.

If we sign a couple of midfielders and defensive cover in the next 2 weeks, I'll have no problem carrying Holt. But for what he's going to offer, and what our football will continue to be like, there's no way 28 grand a week will be value for money.

Your posts are just full of assumptions, including the most glaring one that we're paying the full £28K a week, and even that it is £28k a week.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #758 on: January 15, 2014, 11:54:30 AM »
[He's unfit

Sorry, I didn't realize you have ITK with the trainers at Wigan.  Maybe you'd like to reporoduce their reports for us?

3- He was skipper at Norwich

Indeed, when Lambert was manager, and it worked very well - of course he'll be working with different players but Lambert will have taken that into account, because he worked with both sets.  Thanks for confirming my argument.
I saw enough of Holt last season at Norwich. I won't reproduce a report I'll just go and ask a Wigan fan for their opinion and record the howls of laughter.

We'll see just how influential Holt can be from the bench every game. About as influential as Culverhouse I'd imagine.

If we sign a couple of midfielders and defensive cover in the next 2 weeks, I'll have no problem carrying Holt. But for what he's going to offer, and what our football will continue to be like, there's no way 28 grand a week will be value for money.

Your posts are just full of assumptions, including the most glaring one that we're paying the full £28K a week, and even that it is £28k a week.
Holt certainly won't go on chicken feed. I'm just going on the same assumption as the papers are reporting and also by the fact Whelan, prize bellend he might be, is no fool. He'll have us paying the whole shebang.
I thought internet forums were all about assumptions? ;)
Mine is that we're unnecessarily spending money when we should be trying to get more out of Helenius and finding ways of playing without hoofing the ball..

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #759 on: January 15, 2014, 11:54:58 AM »
Given that it is Wigan Holt has come from, if we are paying all his wages, I fully expect that gobshite Dave Whelan to appear on SSN within the next week, talking about it

He was on last night giving it the "We couldn't deny the lad an opportunity to go back and play in the Premier League but rest assured we will replace him". It was a bit over the top considering he was letting a squad player that has been there five minutes out on loan for a few months. Not that he is the type to milk his regular SKY five minutes of fame.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #760 on: January 15, 2014, 11:58:41 AM »
Given that it is Wigan Holt has come from, if we are paying all his wages, I fully expect that gobshite Dave Whelan to appear on SSN within the next week, talking about it

He was on last night giving it the "We couldn't deny the lad an opportunity to go back and play in the Premier League but rest assured we will replace him". It was a bit over the top considering he was letting a squad player that has been there five minutes out on loan for a few months. Not that he is the type to milk his regular SKY five minutes of fame.
He just had to appease the heartbroken Wigan fans. ;)

Offline damon loves JT

  • Member
  • Posts: 18458
  • Location: The Historic County of York
  • GM : 31.08.2016
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #761 on: January 15, 2014, 12:02:07 PM »
Lambert should sign a locking wheelnut mounted on a plinth in case El-Ahmadi gets injured

Offline SX150

  • Member
  • Posts: 1025
  • Location: White Man in Hammersmith Palais
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #762 on: January 15, 2014, 12:06:49 PM »
I have to agree the unloading of Ireland was fantastic news. The fact that we have got Grant Holt on short term loan rather than offering a 3 year contract is also a massive bonus.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7132
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #763 on: January 15, 2014, 12:08:53 PM »
Given that it is Wigan Holt has come from, if we are paying all his wages, I fully expect that gobshite Dave Whelan to appear on SSN within the next week, talking about it

Whelan? Didn't he break his leg in an FA Cup final once?

Offline phantom limb

  • Member
  • Posts: 1464
  • Location: Beep Street
  • GM : 05.02.2021
Re: Grant Holt - confirmed on loan
« Reply #764 on: January 15, 2014, 12:09:54 PM »
I can remember a Wigan fan telling me about how great Charles N'Zogbia was...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal