I want to go down and that is the problem.I am not a customer, I am a supporter. Owners and the league in general know this and exploit us as fans because of this. If we were customers, then football would have packed up long ago.What other customers would take changes to opening times to make them highly inconvenient and a hyperinflation of the product price way beyond an increase in the quality, to name but two issues with the game.
The reasoning behind the cardiff change was to try to get the floating welsh support behind them agianst the English rather than for commercial reasons, don't think it went down very well though, from the comments by the cardiff fans I went to uni with at least.
Quote from: Ads on November 18, 2013, 05:25:21 PMI want to go down and that is the problem.I am not a customer, I am a supporter. Owners and the league in general know this and exploit us as fans because of this. If we were customers, then football would have packed up long ago.What other customers would take changes to opening times to make them highly inconvenient and a hyperinflation of the product price way beyond an increase in the quality, to name but two issues with the game.They stopped treating us like fans and more like customers years ago, that horse has already bolted.
Flogging sponsorship for large amounts of money is far more understandable - and acceptable - than the sort of piddling amounts of money low rent sponsorships like substitutes would bring in.
I don't get it.I thought the thing behind Tan changing Cardiff from blue to red was mostly because red is the colour associated with success in Asia, rather than something anti English.Or am I missing something?
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on November 18, 2013, 11:39:46 AMFlogging sponsorship for large amounts of money is far more understandable - and acceptable - than the sort of piddling amounts of money low rent sponsorships like substitutes would bring in.That piddling amount of money could be the difference between offering an academy player a contract or letting him go, that academy player could become the next Gary Shaw.
So blatant racism is alive and well in our Prem ?Just as long as you do not make monkey sounds, or call somebody a ...., ?But it is ok for some bloke to take over a club and target the anti English fraction, sorry, faction to make himself some sort of messiah ?I don't buy that, or understand that, at all. Go and play in the league of Wales in that case.
Quote from: Plumbutt Cooper on November 18, 2013, 10:09:35 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on November 18, 2013, 11:39:46 AMFlogging sponsorship for large amounts of money is far more understandable - and acceptable - than the sort of piddling amounts of money low rent sponsorships like substitutes would bring in.That piddling amount of money could be the difference between offering an academy player a contract or letting him go, that academy player could become the next Gary Shaw.But you could make the same argument about pretty much every other bit of revenue we have. Effectively it is a 'take the money' argument - you could say the same thing if they put the prices up significantly every year, or if they decided to do a deal with a record company to play a One Direction song every time we scored (although if it were done on a "per play" basis, that wouldn't earn much etc etc etc).You could have said the same thing about that iffy booking charge they started adding this season on ticket orders.
Can i ask seeing as we have had ten pages now is there any solid information that Red Bull wants to buy our club or is it just another rumour?
But will Red Bull give us wins?