We were paying his wages whether he played or not? Let alone no involvement for two years. Now he'll still be on the same deal? None of it adds up. It would be nice to get an explanation.
I think a 12 month contract would have been ok not 36. Priority should be Delph and Vlaar not the right back.
Quote from: London Villan on September 16, 2014, 08:33:37 PMWe were paying his wages whether he played or not? Let alone no involvement for two years. Now he'll still be on the same deal? None of it adds up. It would be nice to get an explanation.How do you know its the same deal?I would hazard a guess and say that Hutton has taken a pay cut in exchange for a longer contract.Nice one Alan and the way you are playing. Deserved.
I know what Lambert said, but as with all the bomb squad they were not producing for their wages, He is the only one who has made it back to any great degree, And credit to him, he has proved me totally wrong and I dare say many of the management team as well