I think the last 3 months of the season raised expectation beyond realism, mainly due to Benteke Gabby and Weimann looking like they could take most sides apart. Unfortunately apart from Gabby, the others have not turned up really. The biggest issue though is the shape going forward, as Gabby and Weimann are never in the wide positions you would hope for them to be in to exploit a side, and we are too similar in the centre of midfield. 2-3 players would transform us though, and at the moment position wise Lambert has improved us. There is a growing hype about the performances, and he is becoming more and more disliked which is worrying, I do hope the support stays with him. He has a track record of attacking sides, including us last season, and I reckon privately the way we are playing at times will be really annoying him and his staff.
We just need a creative player in there, he won't solve everything and we wouldn't suddenly turn into top 6 contenders.I remember 99/2000 season, we were plodding along and in crap form, not too dissimilar to this period. We signed Carbone on loan and together with Merson those two sparking us into life we were good to watch for the rest of that season, reaching that infamous cup final.We have so many players of the same ilk in central midfield, run around a bit, tackle a bit and pass sideways a bit but we don't bleedin need three of those all doing that, the watercarrier role.Find someone who actually relishes sliding throughballs through a packed defence for forwards.Hatem Ben Arfa ripped us to shreds at VP earlier this season, the best opposition player I've seen at VP this year, he can't even get in the team at the minute. The top teams are overflowing with them.We have none. It would make us better to watch and maybe even win us some more home games. It would be a start.
I think selling Benteke to raise cash for a couple of good midfielders, a defender and obviously a replacement for the big man, could help us no end. I think with his form as it is, I'd be tempted to cash in on Jan, because if he's off kilter for the rest of the season, we all know he's going in the summer anyway. If he's had a bad season we'll be lucky to get 10 mill for him. Right now we could still sell him for 20-25 mill in Jan.
Quote from: supertom on December 08, 2013, 11:45:57 PMI think selling Benteke to raise cash for a couple of good midfielders, a defender and obviously a replacement for the big man, could help us no end. I think with his form as it is, I'd be tempted to cash in on Jan, because if he's off kilter for the rest of the season, we all know he's going in the summer anyway. If he's had a bad season we'll be lucky to get 10 mill for him. Right now we could still sell him for 20-25 mill in Jan.Eh?If he has a bad season, his value will go down, but if we sell him in three weeks time, after having an extended barren period, he'll be worth as much as he ever was? Not sure how that works.The other problem is that you're suggesting we use the money from him to buy four players. That's one player off and four on to the wage bill, which is going to be problematic. Not to mention the idea of doing all that in January, which is probably the biggest obstacle.We don't need to spend huge amounts to improve us by a decent amount.We've failed to score in six of our last nine matches, which is the period in which Benteke has not been producing. It'd be madness to gamble on replacing him effectively in January when we're struggling to score goals.
But you're not going to get that number of players in in January. That's never going to happen.Benteke is still a very good player. He's having a tricky patch having come back from injury, talking of being able to get someone to give us 20m for him in january is absolutely nuts.
We'd also have to replace Benteke which will cost a lot. It's not like we have anybody to do what an in form Benteke can. We need him back to form asap and we also need a creative playmaker and a centre half. Then things will look much rosier.