Delph always strikes me as football who has the intelligence to see from the likes of Scott Sinclair that moving to a club like City doesn't necessarily provide a boost to a player's career.
Quote from: The Villa Werewolf on July 07, 2015, 11:25:17 AMDelph always strikes me as football who has the intelligence to see from the likes of Scott Sinclair that moving to a club like City doesn't necessarily provide a boost to a player's career.It didn't really ruin it though either, did it?He had a couple of decent years at Swansea (one in a lower division), moved to Man City, gave it a go and when it didn't work out he then moved on to a bigger club than the one that he left in order to join Man City in the first place. Like spending a couple of years at Chelsea didn't really ruin Steve Sidwell's career. Picked up more money and a couple of medals and was still able to move from there to a top six club which would have been the alternative at the time when leaving Reading.
Quote from: Andy1874 on July 07, 2015, 10:57:09 AMBut if they did, you still believe he'll stay ?Yes. I trust him. What he said when he signed the contract goes above and beyond what he needed to say. That we're in a year when players are competing for places at the Euros also changes things slightly as well.He'd be an idiot to leave and I don't think he's an idiot. Delph will be a Villa player on the 1st of September 2015 (or whatever is the day after the window shuts). Mark my words.
But if they did, you still believe he'll stay ?
Quote from: Smirker on July 07, 2015, 11:13:15 AMQuote from: Andy1874 on July 07, 2015, 10:57:09 AMBut if they did, you still believe he'll stay ?Yes. I trust him. What he said when he signed the contract goes above and beyond what he needed to say. That we're in a year when players are competing for places at the Euros also changes things slightly as well.He'd be an idiot to leave and I don't think he's an idiot. Delph will be a Villa player on the 1st of September 2015 (or whatever is the day after the window shuts). Mark my words.Of course it was above and beyond what was needed to say. But ultimately if he was absolutely certain of staying why insert the clause at all. Assuming that clause exists and what's been written about it is true then it wasn't a relegation release clause. So he wanted that clause to be in place even if we survived relegation and that implies he probably would be off if the clause is activated. As I say it's all guess work, but if that clause exists there is a reason it's there.
I know he said what he did when he signed his contract, and I'm sure he meant it at the time, but I wouldn't blame him if he left. He will treble his pay, get a juicy signing on fee and secure his family's future until the 22nd century.Or stay for our relegation struggle and play for England for 3 games this time next year. He might not even do that if another unheard of Spurs player emerges next Spring.Te-ra-a-bit Fabian.
You're right £33.5 million is peanuts we should have put a buyout clause the same cost as Cristiano Ronaldo or Bale maybe
Quote from: stuart445 on July 07, 2015, 03:40:41 PMYou're right £33.5 million is peanuts we should have put a buyout clause the same cost as Cristiano Ronaldo or Bale maybe Yes, of course, but then if you do that he might not want to sign the contract in the first place, so you need to come to something of a compromise. I don't think it's a particularly low fee anyway, given it was come to when the player had just had a first good season after a £7m transfer.