I wouldn't say the clean sheets thing is quite a red herring. It means you can never win by scoring one goal. That's a bit of a bummer!
Quote from: Matt Collins on September 21, 2013, 10:14:15 AMI wouldn't say the clean sheets thing is quite a red herring. It means you can never win by scoring one goal. That's a bit of a bummer!Precisely. It means we have to score a minimum of 2 goals to win a game. Something we've done just once so far this season. Why people try to play the clean sheets argument down is anyone's guess.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on September 21, 2013, 10:57:26 AMQuote from: Matt Collins on September 21, 2013, 10:14:15 AMI wouldn't say the clean sheets thing is quite a red herring. It means you can never win by scoring one goal. That's a bit of a bummer!Precisely. It means we have to score a minimum of 2 goals to win a game. Something we've done just once so far this season. Why people try to play the clean sheets argument down is anyone's guess. It isn't 'playing it down' it's being factual. Last season only two sides, Man City (34) and Arsenal (37), averaged less than one goal conceded per game.Nobody would argue that we didn't have huge problems to start with but similarly, if you stick to the facts, we improved after Christmas when it contributed to our better results.
After Ron went off and Lowton came on I thought we regressed back to bad old days of 12 months ago. Both Rodriguez and Osvaldo were allowed to pick easy headers. Any idea how many games Ron will miss?
Sorry but the argument doesn't make sense. I don't mind if we AVERAGE conceding a goal a game so much. But if you concede at least one in EVERY game then you're going to struggle to win.We'd have lost v Sunderland west ham and hull, drawn v Norwich, if we couldn't keep a clean sheet. That's 5 fewer points and close to the relegation zoneIt's pretty simple really
I will always see Herd as more of a defensive midfielder/right back than central defender.