Quote from: Villadroid on June 30, 2013, 09:41:02 AMIt is never nice when a player or other individual is picked on ..... In broader terms the role of scapegoat should be seen as an honourable one.Deep man. Real deep
It is never nice when a player or other individual is picked on ..... In broader terms the role of scapegoat should be seen as an honourable one.
The stick bannan gets is trivial compared to the flak given by those around me and including me at the likes of Simon stainrod and paul Elliott.
It is never nice when a player or other individual gets picked on but I think you have to accept that creating a scapegoat is a necessity for the proper function and cohesion of the tribe and the sustaining of its belief system.Just as the scapegoat would serve the purpose of convincing a primitive tribe that the sun would rise in the spring and that next year's harvest would be better, so it goes with the football tribe.Trying to somehow sustain the belief that things are not as bad as they seem requires a scapegoat, so the tribe can claim that everything would be great if it wasn't for X or Y, which avoids the actual reality and sustains hope in the face of disappointment.It is ugly and it seems ignoble but the use of a scapegoat has to be seen as a necessary evil to serve a greater good: sustaining the belief which is necessary for the tribe to cohere.In broader terms the role of scapegoat should be seen as an honourable one.
Quote from: eastie on June 30, 2013, 09:57:53 AMThe stick bannan gets is trivial compared to the flak given by those around me and including me at the likes of Simon stainrod and paul Elliott.Jeeps I've got an outbreak of cold flushes. They are names from the past. Shockers both of them in a Villa shirt.
If/when Benteke has an iffy game people will start saying "he'd rather be at Arsenal" and "his heart's not in it since the summer".
I think this thread is pretty harsh on Villa fans who were absolutely superb last season. Yes there might be the odd one or two at games who like to single out players, but the majority at the games I went to were superb ands I believe were a major factor in us getting some big results at home.
I'm going for Clark too, he always seems to get it in the neck unlike Baker
Quote from: sirlordbaltimore on July 01, 2013, 12:14:34 PMI'm going for Clark too, he always seems to get it in the neck unlike Baker Could that be a reflection of people thinking Baker did a much better job at the back than Clark did, though? I certainly think the majority opinion on here would be that Clark was poor at CB.In which case, he's not necessarily being made a scapegoat, he's being criticised for what people see as his failings.