Quote from: Rigadon on March 08, 2013, 07:43:56 PMQuote from: eastie on March 08, 2013, 01:59:45 PMThe problem in this squad is that there are too many under performers who do not consistently deliver - the likes of Ireland, holman, el ahmedi, bannan, nzogbia( better recently) , and gabby come into this bracket.We can afford the odd off day but too many very rarely have an on day and we cannot afford that.Sorry, Eastie, but Gabby is not in that company. He might not be the 20 goal a season striker we might've wanted a few years ago, but he's more of a threat than any of those others names. Agreed but he is also a threat to our Premier League safety. He promises much but delivers little.
Quote from: eastie on March 08, 2013, 01:59:45 PMThe problem in this squad is that there are too many under performers who do not consistently deliver - the likes of Ireland, holman, el ahmedi, bannan, nzogbia( better recently) , and gabby come into this bracket.We can afford the odd off day but too many very rarely have an on day and we cannot afford that.Sorry, Eastie, but Gabby is not in that company. He might not be the 20 goal a season striker we might've wanted a few years ago, but he's more of a threat than any of those others names.
The problem in this squad is that there are too many under performers who do not consistently deliver - the likes of Ireland, holman, el ahmedi, bannan, nzogbia( better recently) , and gabby come into this bracket.We can afford the odd off day but too many very rarely have an on day and we cannot afford that.
Quote from: peter w on March 08, 2013, 09:47:22 AMI'm sure there's something in Bannan. he played well when we won at Sunderland and for a few ganmes thereafter he and Westwood looked like a good combination. he's stopped playing well - as has Westwood really - and so you can't have completely anonymous players in midfield. Which is why we're struggling. Amongst many other reasons.What summed up Bannan this season was being MOTM against Arsenal and then 3 days later being arguably our worst player against Reading.
I'm sure there's something in Bannan. he played well when we won at Sunderland and for a few ganmes thereafter he and Westwood looked like a good combination. he's stopped playing well - as has Westwood really - and so you can't have completely anonymous players in midfield. Which is why we're struggling. Amongst many other reasons.
Quote from: Surrey Villain on March 08, 2013, 09:51:14 PMQuote from: Rigadon on March 08, 2013, 07:43:56 PMQuote from: eastie on March 08, 2013, 01:59:45 PMThe problem in this squad is that there are too many under performers who do not consistently deliver - the likes of Ireland, holman, el ahmedi, bannan, nzogbia( better recently) , and gabby come into this bracket.We can afford the odd off day but too many very rarely have an on day and we cannot afford that.Sorry, Eastie, but Gabby is not in that company. He might not be the 20 goal a season striker we might've wanted a few years ago, but he's more of a threat than any of those others names. Agreed but he is also a threat to our Premier League safety. He promises much but delivers little.Just watch him go for the rest of the season. He will score tomorrow and more in the coming weeks. Nothing wrong with Gabby.
I thought Bannan had a decent game today. Kept it neat and tidy when he had to and rarely gave the ball away. Good to see him back.
I thought Bannan's good spell in the game coincided with the team's good spell - namely, the middle third of the match (from the Reading goal to about the 65th minute). I'm not sure whether we played well because he did, or if he played well because everyone else did (bit of both, you'd suspect), but I do think we lost a bit of composure in possession when he went off. What impressed me most today, however, wasn't that he didn't make mistakes with the ball, but the fight he showed in making amends for them. That was very welcome.